californiagrown
Active member
both are equally likely and actually go hand-in-hand, what was the seminal point where one became taboo, and the other wholly acceptable?
Believin g in God Vs. believing in ghosts
- Thread starter californiagrown
- Start date
Skavengers303
Member
which one is taboo and which is acceptable?
JakeAssBeatClap
Active member
Ghosts are 100% not real and therefore totally unlikely. I don't believe in a god but I'd have to say it's a hell of a lot more likely that a higher being/creator exists than fucking ghosts you nimrod.
Amadeus.
Active member
Now you may think that its more likely, but there is the same amount of evidence for both of them. AKA 0. So even though to a petty human mind we may think that the universe needs designing because we cant understand it doesn't mean that god is anymore likely than the existence of ghosts.
Im not sure OP. People have been brainwashed into thinking that the big cults of today (christianity, judaism, and Islam) are somehow not ridiculous just because a number of people believe in them. The Greek Gods have as much evidence for their existence as the abrahamic god but if you told people you believed in them they would think you were nuts.
Im not sure OP. People have been brainwashed into thinking that the big cults of today (christianity, judaism, and Islam) are somehow not ridiculous just because a number of people believe in them. The Greek Gods have as much evidence for their existence as the abrahamic god but if you told people you believed in them they would think you were nuts.
yourthemannowdog
Active member
Wanna debate the ontological argument?
JStrathern
Active member
Delete before shitstorm por favor
prosnurfer
Active member
becomming a ghost is reaching the next level of consciousness. becomming a god is when you are the highest rank of ghost
act.resist
Active member
feihlination
Active member
shut up kitty before i gorilla glue your hind legs together as well
act.resist
Active member
:O
Sneaky_Aziz
Member
There's some weird shit that has gone down which without ghosts couldn't be explained. Ghosts are real, God, maybe...
Da_Buddha
Member
<object width="560" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1IAhDGYlpqY?hl=en_US&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1IAhDGYlpqY?hl=en_US&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
californiagrown
Active member
both are invisable.
both assume the soul lives on after death.
both are unprovable.
Jesus was a ghost when he rose from the dead on the 3rd day and chatted with Mary Magdalene.
ghosts=religon?
both assume the soul lives on after death.
both are unprovable.
Jesus was a ghost when he rose from the dead on the 3rd day and chatted with Mary Magdalene.
ghosts=religon?