Baggy ski pants

F

FreekZz

New member
I am searching for tall ski pants which i can automaticly wear baggy, but without a giantic waste size because i am pretty thin. My waste size is 74 cm. My hip size is 96 cm. My leg length is 113 from my hip to my ankle. If you have an idea of what brand i should pick pleas tell me. I would like these pants to be below 100,- because i dont have that much money. If there is already a threat around here that is about the same subject than pleas tell me.

thanks!

 
Do you wear the tall version or the normal lenght version? and if you wear the normal lenght version is that one still ong enough to reach over your ski boot and still be a bit baggy?
 
1. Purchase XL or XXL of desired ski pants, regardless of waist size2. Purchase a belt or suspenders

3. ????

4. Profit

 
i found saga to be kinda tight now a days compared to other companies. FD has the baggiest pants i would say
 
Agree. They will have a baggy waiste if not wearing as bibs. My old 686's from like 4 seasons ago were pretty baggy too.
 
yea i bought the tan sessions crew pants for like 70 also u can probably find tnf fargo cargo pants for cheap at a local shop they can be baggy if you sag them right
 
Hey man, I am skinny as well so our waist sizes cater to people like us. We are doing a spring clearance sale at the moment which will be ending at the end of July. Get a pair of pants for $90 with the discount code FIFTY. Shoot me a PM if you're interested or have questions.
 
Waist size doesn't matter (to an extent) as long as you have suspenders/bibs. Just get something in a larger size. And sometimes tall can add a weird fit if they're too tall.
 
I'm planning to go to the Alps at the end of the year (on the Swiss side). If anyone has any references for vintage ski pants that look y2k, I'd love to hear them!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top