Bacons vs. Seths on groomers

[-Nick-]

How do these two compare on groomers? ive researched and found every thing else but this and right now im leaning towards the bacons

 

[t_rob]

i don't understand why you would want to know this in the first place. you are taking two top of the line pow skis and comparing their quality on groomers? why are you trying to create a one ski quiver or something. I would assume the seths won't be better on groomers condering their waist comapred to the bacons.

 

[iggyskier]

Seth will be better, but bacons seem more than capable.

 

[rockerrider]

ya man, what the hell? a lot of people want a pow ski that does decent on the crud... whats the point in being a d bag...

 

[t_rob]

wo dude, i wasn't writing in to hate on him so why am i getting all of this hate back?

 

[skinnylove]

Because it was a dumb comment. Tonnes of people have Seth's as a one ski quiver.

 

[buchanan.]

yuuss, seths are dope. they charge everywhere.

 

[K2skipunk]

hellbents are my only ski, well, other than last years ak enemys, fat soft skis are more than capable on groomers though dood

 

[-Nick-]

thanks guys. its not a one ski quiver btw i have two other pairs of volkls i mainly ride the karmas so im looking for something softer, so the bacons are looking good right now and i only asked because i know how they ski in the pow i just wasnt sure about groomers

 

[Literature]

I skied the Bacons today and am getting a pair. So buttery and fun, and they do fine on groomers and charging through trees and off cliffs. Those skis make me feel like I can butter off of anything.

 

[GL830]

Seth's are awesome on groomers, even decent on ice. As for the Bacons, I've only skied the Elizabeths but they were pretty awesome on groomers too, and have a super-tight turn radius (i.e. I could do very tight, straight up edge to edge slalom turns on them without any difficulty). I think it's going to be much of a muchness, really.