I'm not even going to try to correct some of the idiotic conjecture on avalanche stats. Try google, or better yet, go read Ian McCammon: www.snowpit.com
'I'm an engineering STUDENT who is way smarter than anyone ever especially all those EXPERIENCED engineers (who actually have their degrees too) and snow safety scientists that have been in the industry longer than I've been alive. My device is failsafe, I've thought of everything, and I don't want your opinions because I'm smarter than all of you, now answer my fucking marketing survey you assholes.' What an arrogant prick.
His device must either be:
1. An SCBA system tank + regs and an auto deploying mask
2. A new design of the avalung principle (air intake and exhaust in separate positions to prevent ice mask).
3. Mr. know-it-all hasn't met Mr. Murphy:
Some sort or snorkel system which could be destroyed by the slide or not long enough or at the wrong angle or some sort of avalanche airbag mask that will inflate around your face to create an large airspace, however the inflating bag can: 1. pop or rip by the avalanche 2. Provide a lever for the avalanche to torque off your friggin head if the airspace is big enough and the bag is made by something the avalanche won't destroy (though then one wonders how he inflates it without messing up the victims face or causing barotrauma, that should be cool).
-----
It had better be helmet compatible because nobody is going to ditch the trauma protection of a helmet for this toy. What’s more likely, crashing or being caught in a slide?
For heavens, sakes, don't encourage idiocy by calling it 'avalanche protection.'
It won’t save the victim from trauma. It won’t save the victim if they are alone. It won’t save the victim whose chest is crushed. It won’t save the victim who didn’t see the slide or couldn’t press the button in time.
It is what I would do if it were me. It's not me and neither are you.
Mountain Rescue - High Altitude Dive Rescue