Atomic/Salomon Warden

.MASSHOLE.

.MASSHOLE.

Active member
Anyone skiing these?

Interested in getting a pair but the 13 din and lack of reviews has me wary.

Onenerdykid, any clue if they'll make a 16 din version?

Anyone know how similar the mounting pattern is to the STH?
 
what's its...angle? like what niche is it supposed to fill/why would you consider them over STHs or something?

i don't know shit about the binding but (pure speculation ahead) i have a hard time imagining that a binding that only has a 13 din version is particularly strong and high-performing..?
 
13660605:Titsandwich11 said:
what's its...angle? like what niche is it supposed to fill/why would you consider them over STHs or something?

i don't know shit about the binding but (pure speculation ahead) i have a hard time imagining that a binding that only has a 13 din version is particularly strong and high-performing..?
Click to expand...

They can be used with either alpine or AT boots.
 
13660605:Titsandwich11 said:
what's its...angle? like what niche is it supposed to fill/why would you consider them over STHs or something?

i don't know shit about the binding but (pure speculation ahead) i have a hard time imagining that a binding that only has a 13 din version is particularly strong and high-performing..?
Click to expand...

13661013:Outoftowner said:
They can be used with either alpine or AT boots.
Click to expand...

AT boot compatibility. Looking to move from a Tecnica Cochise to a more AT-oriented boot with a better heel hold.

That way, I can mount them with QK's so I can use my Kingpins for BC and these for inbounds.
 
13661013:Outoftowner said:
They can be used with either alpine or AT boots.
Click to expand...

13661293:.MASSHOLE. said:
AT boot compatibility. Looking to move from a Tecnica Cochise to a more AT-oriented boot with a better heel hold.

That way, I can mount them with QK's so I can use my Kingpins for BC and these for inbounds.
Click to expand...

ohhh i see. thanks boys
 
13664633:.MASSHOLE. said:
I was under the impression only the Lord would take pure AT boots (a la Dynafit Vulcans, Khions, Salomon Labs, Scarpa Maestrales, etc.)
Click to expand...

Up until this year that was the case but in the 2017 catalog Marker is releasing the Jester Pro, Jester, Griffon, and Lord with "Sole.ID" technology which basically looks like the adjustable AFD plate on the Lord. It says it is fully compatible with both alpine (ISO 5355) and full tech (ISO 9523) soles and not just a WTR adjustment.
 
13664646:patagonialuke said:
Up until this year that was the case but in the 2017 catalog Marker is releasing the Jester Pro, Jester, Griffon, and Lord with "Sole.ID" technology which basically looks like the adjustable AFD plate on the Lord. It says it is fully compatible with both alpine (ISO 5355) and full tech (ISO 9523) soles and not just a WTR adjustment.
Click to expand...

Good to know. The real question is, is it worth getting the Jester Pro? I prefer metal bindings for the most part.

We will have to see.

Thanks for the info.
 
13664646:patagonialuke said:
Up until this year that was the case but in the 2017 catalog Marker is releasing the Jester Pro, Jester, Griffon, and Lord with "Sole.ID" technology which basically looks like the adjustable AFD plate on the Lord. It says it is fully compatible with both alpine (ISO 5355) and full tech (ISO 9523) soles and not just a WTR adjustment.
Click to expand...

the jester pro won't have the sole.ID just the griffon and jester
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top