Newschoolers55
Member
So ive been looking bindings for my revisions and i have limited to these two, but i dont know anything about bindings so what are pros and cons about these bindings and witch ones should i buy?
13494052:Poikenz said:Attacks, hands down. The FFG will have the crappy oversize toe that no one likes.
13494072:Volvo242 said:What makes them bad?
13494240:freeski1620 said:FFG has a different form factor than its bigger brothers the FFG 13 and FFG 16. Most notably a 3 hole toe that is considerably easier to pull out than its 4 screw counterparts. Oh and don't forget that mostly plastic heel piece everyone seems to be experts at destroying in a matter of days.
Attack on the other hand is the same binding boys like Joss and McRae ride and have very little to no problems with. Just with a 13 din spring as opposed to a 16 like the boys ride.
Oh and its a lot harder to blow up a Tyrolia brake. Land switch and blow out once on the FFG's and you'll be looking into purchasing a new brake for sure.
13494052:Poikenz said:Attacks, hands down. The FFG will have the crappy oversize toe that no one likes.
13494604:Lamafama said:The FFG 14/16 - STH 13/16 WTR have one of the best toes in the industry.
The 10/12 don't as they use the Z toe which is a plasticy bit of wank.
13495785:Zurg said:Attacks! But as a heads up, the attacks brakes screw into your top sheet, so if you blow one, you'll have to drill into the ski again.