Armada T-Hall (Scarface)

aSkiingWarPig

aSkiingWarPig

Member
From these forums I read about many broken Völkl Walls, so I started looking for some another park ski, which can also be skied outside the park. So I became interested in Armada T-Hall.

I want a ski that rides great in the park, is very light, easy to ride switch and good for rails and buttering. It should also be fairly good in trees and powder, but mostly for the park.

I also got interested in buttering so it should not be too stiff for that.

And durable enough for rails.

So from what i´ve read of Armada T-Hall, it would be perfect for me.

But which one would be better for me, this years T-Hall or last years T-Hall Scarface?

What differences between those two?

 
i found this years to be a little bit stiffer but more stable. imo i would go ar6, not thall. i have them and love them to death
 
i have the thall scarface and i love them...sick in the park perfect for butters and still really fun to cruise around the mountain...will not be disspointed with them
 
OK. Oh and I forgot to tell I´m about 170lbs and 5'10''ish and still growing a little. Are the T-Halls going to be too soft for me if I land a little back seat? But I still want it to be soft enough to butter easily..

And what about the Salomon Thruster? Would they be good for a skier like me? Are they easy to butter?
 
with your weight I would go with this or next years thalls. they are the same just a diff. graphic. they will not be to soft.
 
we are bout the same dimensions and i have a pair of 171 thalls they rode great. they have a good flex, but not noodle and stable enough for larger landings
 
i ride ar6 right now and absolutley love them. im 6'2 185. do you think the thall would be too soft for me
 
i have yet to have a pair snap hahaha, but i did have one pair pull out... could have been core or mount issue. regardless i got another pair.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top