Armada jj vs salamon czar

bahahahahaha yes anther one of these threads

but seriously we need some specifications(ie:hieght waight skiing abitilty
 
There is no "better" ski. Give us some stats and tell us how you ski, and maybe we can tell you which one is more SUITABLE for you.
 
man if you want all of us to give you some effort with a ski recomendation, you're going to have to put some effort in how you ski.

tell us what percent of the time you ski pow, park etc.

why do you want a ski this wide?

are you an agressive skier?

tell us all about you, and then we'll help you out.

bith are really sick skis, but they are also very very different.
 
i think the jj's are gonna be a playful ski that will be a ton of fun in the pow, especially if you wanna ride switch in it. they're really soft in the tip and tail, but still fairly stiff under the boot where its got the ar50 sidewalls. the czars are stiffer in the tip and tail, so you could probably charge harder on those. they'll be fun in the pow too. they're not rockered in the tails so they would be a little harder to ski switch in the pow.

this year i'm gonna get the jj's. i think they're gonna be such a fun ski. I got scratch bc's too, so getting the czars would kinda seem like an overlap.
 
hey thanks alot. i havt skied either but i thought that the czar was rockered in the back. i like stiffer skies in general but the jj seems like the better choice. i was kinda curious about the new salomons just because they actually decided to make them wood core this year
 
ya dude, it sucks it doesnt have rocker in the tip. how come sammy and them use it for bc botters anyway, or do the. i at least saw sammy with them in retallic, in the vis of course
 
The Czar only has rocker in the tip, no rocker in the tails.

It's the middle child between the Rocker (720mm of rocker) and the Lord (210mm)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top