ARMADA HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

[vermontsteez]

ok so im 5'7 and dunno which should i get 166 or 161...... hellllllppp meee.

 

[teamsleep]

171

 

[vermontsteez]

really? there not going to be to big?

 

[lyndon]

im 5'7 and have 176 t-halls.

 

[teamsleep]

im 5 5 and i was so close to buying the 171 armada but i bought the scratches instead price wise.

youll def like the length for landing and grabbing plus its more stable. unless ur wicked light I would definately buy the 171. Im pretty sure most ppl here will agree.

 

[Paul-o-Rama]

you want at least 171, im 5'10" and my 4frnts are 180 and my scratches are 174,

161 would be waaay too small for you

 

[eheath]

At least 171 if not 176. I have 180s and 188s and im 5'8"

 

[invaderskier36]

your also fat thow so you need a longer length

 

[poofartpee]

id say 176 or 181 but depends how much park u ride, where ur going to mount, and ur size/height

 

[ikellen]

go 171, unless you're more than 160lbs, then go 176. Im 5'7 145lbs and I ski a 171 AR6.

 

[skithebigA]

171 i ski on 178 and i am 5 9

 

[Sholte]

171

 

[pales]

finally someone that knows skis are not related to height!

 

[-NY-STeeZE-]

go 171

 

[VirginiaCliff]

im 5'8 150 and im rocking 181's. you really dont want anyhting smaller than 171, regardless of weight, because small skis suck

 

[Goobie]

im 5,8 and i have 161s

 

[tjski]

word

 

[Pwn.Mode]

Nailed It!

 

[vermontsteez]

ok thnz 171's it is.

 

[vermontsteez]

yup im 5'7 155 probably ski 40-50% park and 30% grooms and 20% pow... so i should get 171?

 

[ijibgoremtn]

no you might ove power those at 155 lbs id get the 176 cuz it will ride better all mountain because of the extra length also

 

[Tmeels]

im 5'8" and got 171's. at first i regretted it but now that I'm used to them I would never go back to 166's. NEVER! go 171. i ride 100% park and the added length is awesome for jumps and you dont notice it while spinning

 

[Bigwoods]

get the 171's

 

[Bennettc14]

171s at least playa