13998016:skimanbearpig said:I really like my pair. They feel super stiff and solid when carving, skiing steeps/moguls, and riding park. However, they soften up quite a bit and you can really get up on the noses and rails if you want. Altogether they are a great all rounder and I’ve enjoyed them in pretty much every condition.
13998048:nelsonkai said:I saw on another post you are also using salomon sth’s for bindings. Ifyou are, how are they working out for you, im looking to buy those as the exact same set up (with armada arv 96) If you use them in the park, do they seem heavy at all and/or is the binding height a problem at all bc i know they are a bit tall? Thanks
13998049:skimanbearpig said:The STHs are super solid. Haven’t had any issues with them. I have Attack2 13 and Griffons on my other skis and the STHs are my favorite out of the 3. Honestly, I don’t notice much difference in weight or stand height between them. What is noticeable is the durability, step in feel, and any play the boot may have in the bindings of which the STH is definitely my favorite for those qualities. Also I really like how the brakes lock into each other much more solidly than the others. I hiked a lot with my skis on my shoulder and they are super comfortable because there is no movement like there is on my Al Dentes with the Griffons.
13998096:nelsonkai said:Just out of curiosity, do you have the black/orange sth’s on your arv 96s? If so, does the orange on the binding match the orange on the ski?
Lol itd look dope of it did
13998048:nelsonkai said:I saw on another post you are also using salomon sth’s for bindings. Ifyou are, how are they working out for you, im looking to buy those as the exact same set up (with armada arv 96) If you use them in the park, do they seem heavy at all and/or is the binding height a problem at all bc i know they are a bit tall? Thanks