Thank you for answering my question, but if another country which was a major consumer happened to be our closetst (and only) neighbour, dont you think that we would export all of our stuff to them as well? I wont argue that we enjoy your protection, but there are many many issues that we get the short end of the stick on. But you said you were dont with the debat, and so shall I.
So, If you had stoped at an eye for an eye, only 2 buildings destroyed and only thousands of terrorists left dead. i would have not be having this argument. The fact of the matter is that terrorists have not destroyed family homes, yes, they did kill innocent people but those innocent people were not innocent in their eyes. They were the ones who are guilty of perptuatining the materialistic capitilist society which has kept their people oppressed with economic sanctions killing tens of thousands because they couldnt get things like iodine to clean their drinking water. Dont get me wrong, what the terrorists did is totaly bullshit and they deserve to have the warath of the US government fall upon them. But the innocent people of these nations who are are in no way linked to terrorism do not deserve the pain and suffering which we are forcing upon them.
An eye for an eye is understandable, but it is the hardest thing to do. Its nearly impossible to just stop once you have the eye. The burning hatred makes you want to continue, but it also causes hatred in return.
Like a virgin on promnight!
-Thom.Savery.
please pardon the cacography.
CCR.. PPP..
"go down to the bottom bunk and finish yourself"