are you democratic or repulican

you cant map political systems as a sphere, its linear, some are blends of one another which would be more towards the middle, but you cannot compare it to a sphere

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
wow. you people are rediculous.

did you honestly think that I was assigning political beliefs to continents? you gotta be kidding me, it was just much easier to explain their position on the sphere by using the world as a metaphor. say it with me metaphor, m-e-t-a-p-h-o-r.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
say it with me, you cant fucking map political systems in terms of a sphere

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
how is it linear at all? libertarians disagree with both liberals and conservatives at times, as do communists, but libertarians and facists most often disagree. i think its a very accurate model, in fact.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
if they are a blend and agree with 2 different sides they would be in the middle, not below or above implying they are a seperate entity

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
your last post made no sense because they are separate entities...i get the feeling you are way out of your element

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
the whole point of the sphere idea was that the linear model is too inaccurate to be truly representative of a wide variety of political beliefs. Just because you are liberal does not mean you would side with communists over conservatives, the varying distances between points on the sphere indicate that...you try and come up with a better way of presenting it.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
im a fucking economics and politics major dumbass, it does make sense, they are their own theories but incorporate ideologies from other political systems, making the overall structure linear as one system progresses into the other

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
wow, where the fuck are you studying? the fact that you are majoring in something doesn't mean that you understand it. you wanna see my weekly reading list? my school (one of the best high schools in the nation, much better than some colleges) gave me spring semester to intern with a US senator. you don't want to swap credentials with me, bitch.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
ive never heard of an 'economics and politics' major before... ive heard of an economics major, and i have heard of a political science major...

-you think you can take us on... you and your cronies-
 
A.) no high school is better than any university

B.) i have way more credentials than you, and us senators dont accept high school interns

c.) you have yet to prove me wrong

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
surprise bitch!

1. my high school (a new england boarding school) is the only on in the nation that sends its students to the senate during the school year...so you're simply wrong.

2. my high school has facilities and an endowment far exceeding many colleges ($550 million endowment)

3. countless teachers at my school passed up teaching positions at colleges to come to my high school, including several from harvard, princeton, yale.

oh yea, and where do you go? you never answered that question? and by the way, dont try to lie, cause i've got friends at almost every prestigious college in the country who could check this shit out for me.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
can you give me a quick rundown on keynsian economic theory? how about a quick synopsis of the effect that john lockes two treatises on government had on the founding fathers of the us? these questions should be elementry to a double major such as yourself.

-you think you can take us on... you and your cronies-
 
let me just add this in there, from the school website:

Washington Intern Program

The Washington Intern Program of the Phillips Academies, inaugurated in 1966 and now sponsored jointly by Exeter and Andover, is open to qualified seniors. Successful completion of the program grants two load credits, neither of which may be applied to any of the course requirements for the diploma. An English course (43W) in political literature and American culture may be offered depending on the availability of an instructor. Students should consult the head of the Washington Intern Committee. Interns must satisfy the residency requirement of attendance on campus at Exeter (at least three terms during the upper and senior years). The program runs parallel to the spring term, and ends on the Thursday before graduation.

Each student is assigned to the office of a United States Senator or Representative, or an agency of the federal government, and works in that office during the day (9-6, M-F). Though the initial work tends to be clerical, interns often assist their offices in other ways, including answering constituent mail, researching legislative fact sheets, reporting on business conducted at hearings or writing drafts of speeches. They are also given time by their offices to observe the various branches of government in operation. In addition, seminars arranged by the director of the program bring interns together with prominent Washington representatives of various professions with divergent political philosophies. Speakers, about 15-20 in number, include Senators, Representatives, members of the administration, judges, journalists, lobbyists, officers of regulatory agencies, Washington culturati or officials of the DC government.

In Washington interns live as a group at the Capitol Hill Suites. The director of the program, appointed tri-annually from the faculties of the sponsoring schools, is in residence.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
keynesian economics, the idea of supply and demand, aggregate supply and demand to be exact. it includes theories on relationships between deficits and long term interest rates, and also his idea on employment and inflation was explanded on by a man name phillips, making the phillips curve. this says that unemployment can only go so low before causing inflation. (NAIRU) used a lot by greenspan. its the basis for presetn day economic thoery although a man named seidman is challenging that with his idea of an automoatic tax rebate.

fairfield university fuckface

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
that was the WORST definition i've ever heard...

here's the simple, correct version:

Keynesian Economics -- an economic theory developed by John Maynard Keynes that differed from the lassiez-faire theory that dominated economic policy circles prior to the late-1920's, when Keynes introduced his theory. Keynesian economics were first practiced (though not purely), by US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The central concept behind Keynesian economics is that the government must incur a deficit during times of depression to revive the economy. once the economy is back on level footing, taxes would be used to reduce the deficit.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
you get that from an encyclopedia? dude, if you knew anything about economics youd know that my definition encompassed what your definition said. lassaiez fair means that markets are going to clear on their own but there are going to be business cycles to which the Fed and the government haev to take counterfiscal policy to combat.

who do you know at farifield faggot

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
youre not even makign a fucking argument, you dont even realize that fascism wouldnt have to be before liberalism so therefore it couldnt be under it in a sphere

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
con·fer To bestow (an honor, for example): conferred a medal on the hero; conferred an honorary degree on her.

A doctorate is a PhD

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
and no that shit's not from an encylopaedia, go search on google and you wont find shit, those are my own words

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
1. we do have doctorates dumbass

2. so you just decided to capitalize for the first time in the definition?

3. the distance is great and all, but you have to show how one theory progresses into another

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
Does it not strike either of you as just a BIT arbitrary to base intelligence on the name of your fucking SCHOOL? I could've gone to Harvard if I was rich, but I didn't. So rich people are smarter than I am? Bullshit. Anewmorning, I assume he meant a joint major. But quickflash, as I was saying, the problem witha linear system is that different ideologies that may be on completely opposite ends of the political spectrum, in many instances, share traits, but because of the linear setup, they aren't really able to blur. I don't think there SHOULD be a diagram, because the sphere one is by no means perfect either, but I can't really think of a better way to represent political schools as relative to each other. Fairfield doesn't appear on the top 500, by the way. Where is it?

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
its in the top 350, check any of those books that list colleges, and i understadn where youre coming from with blending, but i think a linear model if any would suit it best

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
I just checked the shanghai study, which is what I use. Things like the Harvard report just serve to glorify their own institutions by fixing the criteria. Extracontinental surveys are the only ones that judge reasonably and without bias, in my experience.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
yeah, i usually go with princteon but they can tend to be extremely bias, but fairfield is in there

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
and your college is a reasonable indicator of your intellegence. mostly because HYP don't accept rich kids automatically anymore. its better than asking what you got on your SATs, thats for sure

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
youre talking a lot, still haevnt proven me wrong, and what the hell is HYP

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
harvard yale princeton...

and what do you mean I havent proven you wrong?

you were the one trying to prove me wrong...i'd say you failed.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
Maybe where you were ACCEPTED, but as I say, you might have been accepted to an ivy-league, but decide to go to a local school or something. The name is meaningless. SATs are a bit of a weak indicator, too, but better than 'I go here, so I'm smarter than you'. Cited example: George W. Bush.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
youre a fucking idiot, i came up with sufficient proof it wouldnt be spherical, and all you could do is spit out some definition you found on keynesian economics that was something you would find in a HIGH SCHOOL textbook and didnt explain anything

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
yea, but George W Bush didnt go to Yale just cause he was rich, his father and grandfather had gone there...etc. plus that was in the good old days, around the same time exeter sent 60-70 kids to Harvard a year

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
who gives a fuck where he went, what the hell are you talking about

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
Democrats Suck
article2763.jpg'


i've been steezed out since cub scouts
 
oh the anger. im still waiting on my review of lockes treatises on government and its effect on the founding fathers. by the way, your synopsis of keynsian economics isnt anything that you cant learn at your local community college...although it is more than i expected. im still waiting to be impressed.

(by the way, the only reason i bring this up is you, quickflash, are being so out of control... not that i really care if you know these things or not.)

-you think you can take us on... you and your cronies-
 
bush wants to cut funding for police departments, homeland security is good but what about the police force

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
my original post:

'political spectrum is a sphere.

if the spectrum was the world, north american would be conservative; china, green; japan, liberal; antarctica, communist; south america, fascist; arctic, libertarian.'

The reason that political theories cannot be arranged in a linear progression is that some groups will agree with the right on some issues and the left on others...therefore it is inaccurate to assume that libertarians will always be more conservative than your average conservative as the linear model would suggest. for example, the Patriot Act is opposed by libertarians, yet was introduced by conservatives. liberals also oppose the patriot act (individual freedoms being the allying interest between libertarians and liberals in this case).

while the linear progression fits easily in a text book, it does not, nor could it, reflect the variations and differing motives behind political theories.

i'm republican

i hate bill o'reilly
 
im not being out of control, im just debating on a subject, just as he debated with me

dont worry about what i can or cant do, worry about what you cant do to me
 
Since this has descended into mindless bickering, I think I'll point out how ridiculous all this is, by holding a grammar lesson.

Quote: 'Proven me wrong.'

Now, technically, proven is a word, and a past participle of 'to prove'. However, implmentation is not the same of the more common form, 'Proved'. Proven should be used primarily as an adjective before a noun; for example, 'A proven ability'.

I hope you all learned something. Now stop with the idiocy.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top