Are Line skis overrated?

i worked at a shop for years. we eventually dropped line because they had that much of a problem with durability. i personally snapped two sets of maverick's (tip and tail bent up at 90 degree angle), split a pair of 1260s in two differnt directions (not delam, like totally split the fucker until it ripped), crushed the sidewall/edge/base of some skogans... the list goes on. don't even get me started on their bindings. basically i skied a TON of lines (because i really wanted to support them as a company and buy a pair and my shop had pairs for me to mess around on) and i never managed to find a line that i felt skied well. i also broke every pair i rode with any regularity. i've owned 20ish pairs of skis from all different companies in the last 4 or 5 years, and demo'd a lot more. i gave line as fair a chance as i could, i even favored them slightly, and they totally blew it.

granted, i'm hard on gear and ski a lot... but i've had a pair of troublemakers for 3 years now and they have no major damage. dynastar has a horrible reputation on this site for reliability and mine have survived 150+ days of abuse. this season they were park and urban only even.

i know its just one guys experiances, but through them i've found line to make complete and utter crap.
 
line is getting so creative with their skis, the prophets, the elizabeths, the sir francis bacons, and the invaders are all so different and cool.
 
well ive DESTOYED more than one pair of lines in less than a day of skiing, as for armada not being better......... SOOOOOOOOO much better in everyway durability for one
 
Back
Top