Arcticle Regarding Sarah Burke - Billy Witz

P.opsicle

Member
PARK CITY, Utah



As skiers and snowboarders pause at the entrance of a 500-foot shaft of

snow and ice, known more colloquially as the Park City Mountain Resort

Halfpipe, it is typically to readjust their minds as much as their

bindings.

And, yet, as they take a deep breath to gather courage and

concentration, few take notice of the metal sign mounted on a post just

to their right, even though it beseeches passersby with bold letters.



020812-Winter-AA_20120208113753525_0_0.JPG






A warning sign at the top of the halfpipe run on which Sarah Burke was killed in January.

Billy Witz

STOP READ THIS.

Most signs on the ski resort’s slopes are simple: blue squares, green

circles and black diamonds, indicating with arrows which direction to

take for routes of varying degrees of difficulty. The signs are so plain

and so visible they barely require anyone to slow down, let alone stop,

on their way down the mountain.

But this one reads like a liability waiver, laying out a long set of

expectations and recommendations before warning that plunging into the

halfpipe “exposes you to the risk of serious injury or death. Inverted

aerials are not recommended.”

YOU ASSUME THE RISK.

At any other halfpipe, especially ones that do not have 22-foot-high

walls, at least 4 feet higher than most in the United States, it would

be easier to roll your eyes at this type of lawyerly, cover-your-butt

language. Not here. Not anymore.

Last month, Sarah Burke, a talented, trailblazing freestyle skier, died

after falling during a practice run and slamming her head against the

frozen wall of this halfpipe. Her death comes two years after an elite

snowboarder, Kevin Pearce, suffered a serious brain trauma after a

headfirst fall on the same course. Pearce spent four months in

hospitals, has undergone eye surgeries to recover his sight and

equilibrium and recently got back on a snowboard for the first time,

though his competitive career is over.

These accidents might have rocked the tight-knit community of

freeskiers and snowboarders, whose epicenter lies here. But they do not

seem to have sparked any introspection, let alone any calls to examine

whether this sport, whose essence is about freedom of expression and

blasting through boundaries, has become too dangerous.

Whereas the death of a luge racer on the eve of the Vancouver Olympics

led to changes in the track, speed restrictions for the 2014 Games and

much hand-wringing by those in the sport, nothing of the sort has

happened here.









Sarah Burke: 1982-2012

We look back at the life and career of a winter sports star.

Despite the accidents, it’s hard to find anyone calling for change.

“These accidents that have happened are unfortunate and terrible,” said

Devin Logan, a freeskier who won a slopestyle silver medal last month

at the Winter X Games at age 18. “But they’re accidents. It’s as safe as

it can be. It’s an extreme sport.”

These are not the callous words of the clueless or the detached. They

come from someone who grew up idolizing Burke, as much for the way she

pushed her way into what had been a men’s domain — she is widely

credited with getting superpipe skiing added to the Olympic program for

2014 — as for how her graceful acrobatics showed little girls what was

possible on skis.

The crossover appeal of snowboarder Shaun White notwithstanding, the

world of freeskiing and snowboarding is a cloistered one. In this

circle, Burke was an iconic figure. Photogenic, charming and a pioneer, a

much broader audience learned of Burke in the aftermath of her

accident.

Just days after her death, a candlelight night ski down a mountain in

Aspen, Colo., was part of ESPN’s programming on the X Games. It served

as a solemn, poignant counterpoint to the rest of the adrenaline-fueled,

energy drink-guzzling, can-you-top-this ethos of the event. Many of the

competitors honored Burke by wearing stickers inscribed: I Ski For

Sarah.

It was an idea borrowed from the Vancouver Olympics, when snowboarders

took a pledge, “I Ride For Kevin,” as Pearce lay in a hospital, his

recovery still touch and go. That rallying cry was given a new, upbeat

twist in December, when Pearce got back on his board for the first time

and cruised down a slope in Breckenridge, Colo., accompanied by dozens

of others who wore T-shirts inscribed: Ride With Kevin.

These events were a rare show of solidarity in a sport that is defined

by — and celebrates — the individual. Even at the highest level, where

there are sponsors, coaches, competitors, organizers and fans, it is

about man vs. mountain — and himself.

“In skiing, it’s all individual,” said Tyler Battersby, a development

coach for the Park City Ski Team whose sister, Ashley, is a competitive

skier and whose mother would often host Burke when she trained in Salt

Lake City. “The only interference you have is the weather. It’s a very

concentrated sport. It’s not like soccer, baseball, basketball — you

don’t have to worry about who’s running where when you can’t see all

around you. In skiing and snowboarding, it’s only you. That sets the

mind-set for athletes — it’s just me and this jump, me and this mogul.

That kind of alleviates stress: Anything you do, it’s all on you. There

are no limits. Everyone picks their own limits — what are your goals and

do you want to exceed them?”



020812-OLY-Skiing-Sarah-Burke-Inside_20120208114156436_0_0.JPG






Sarah Burke, just 29 years old when she died, was a pioneering figure in women's superpipe skiing.

Doug Pensinger

That notion, in concept or in the concrete, can be awfully empowering.

Sure, it can be co-opted and trivialized by an ad campaign, but it is

hard to feel anything but unadulterated awe standing at the bottom of

the halfpipe and watching a snowboarder named Scotty Pike launch himself

above the rim, contorting his body into unimaginable twists and flips

about 25 feet in the air and landing gracefully — that is, on his feet —

before riding up the other side and doing it all again.

When he nonchalantly pulled up at the bottom, Pike said there is a

thrill that comes with being able to fly ever-so-briefly and that he

works on these maneuvers on trampolines and in foam pits “so it doesn’t

seem scary.”

Sometimes, though, it is. He has broken his collarbone, twisted knees

and wrenched ankles. But sometimes you just have to, you know, go for

it.

“When my friends do tricks, I have to go with them,” Pike said. “You don’t want to be a pansy.”

The pressure to invent new tricks — or at least mimic them — comes not

just from peers, from judges or from within. There is also the pressure,

implied or explicit, that accompanies sponsorship. If a company invests

in a skier or snowboarder, the athlete is expected to pay it back by

pushing the sport — and the envelope — further.

“Is it the athletes that want (tricks) to get this big or is it the

sponsors?” asked Lance Viola from behind the counter at Bazooka’s Free

Ride Shop, a ski and snowboard store at Park City. “The days of 'take

this sticker and put it on your board' — it’s not like that anymore.

It’s, 'We’ll fly you to Canada and you better do good.' ”

For the elite, like snowboarding champ White, that means being

fortunate enough that before the Vancouver Olympics, his sponsor, Red

Bull, built a private halfpipe in the Colorado backwoods that was

equipped with a 400-square foot pit filled with foam cubes. This allowed

him to perfect the then-cutting edge “double cork,” a pair of diagonal

flips, with a safety net.

It is the same maneuver Pearce was trying to refine when he was

injured. A year earlier, he broke his ankle trying the double cork.









COME HERE

London is getting prepared with these venues for the Olympic Games.

“I felt like I really didn’t have a choice,” Pearce told Outside

Magazine last year. “I knew that if I wanted to win, I needed to land

it.”

If Pearce’s fears or desires were not going to stop him, then who could? Or, more appropriately, who should?

As sports are being played harder and faster, there has been an

increased spotlight on safety. The NFL, after dragging its heels, has

instituted changes in its rules, administration and equipment to help

reduce head injuries, though it is fair to ask whether enough has been

done. Hockey is now beginning to address similar issues after the deaths

last summer of several former enforcers and the possibility its biggest

star, Sidney Crosby, might be forced into premature retirement because

of head injuries. In the wake of Dale Earnhardt’s death more than a

decade ago, NASCAR chassis have been redesigned to better protect

stock-car drivers.

Farther out of the mainstream, the Canadian bobsled team withdrew in

protest last month from a World Cup competition in Germany because the

international federation failed to make changes to the course that would

have made it safer after the Canadians crashed twice.

All of these changes have had catalysts: Players unions, governing

bodies, media and an outraged public have all been agents of change.

In freeskiing and snowboarding, with its emphasis on individualism and

its benefactors emphasizing its extreme nature, who has an interest in

being a voice of caution?

“It’s an interesting ethical question,” said Dr. Colby Hansen, of the

University of Utah’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department.

“When people are on their own, you lose some of that oversight. To what

level is it appropriate to intervene and not allow people to do things

that they want to do by their own choice?”

Hansen says his department’s concussion program sees five to 10 new

patients a week, and up to 20 percent were injured in snowsports. Hansen

said preliminary data collected over the past five years by a

colleague, Dr. Stuart Willick, shows that skiers and snowboarders are

twice as likely to incur a brain injury in the terrain park, where the

halfpipe and other jumps and rails are located, as they are on other

parts of the slope.

Willick declined to confirm those figures but said he is examining

injury patterns of skiers vs. snowboarders, younger vs. older, and

experienced vs. inexperienced. The goal, he said, is to make skiing and

snowboarding safer. To that end, he believes resorts have designed safer

courses and manufacturers have improved safety features.



020812-OLY-Snowboarding-Kevin-Pearce-Inside_20120208113948434_0_0.JPG






Kevin Pearce, seen here in Sept. 2009, was critically injured on the

same halfpipe in Dec. 2010. He recovered but never competed again.

Guy Rhodes

But Willick lamented not having NFL-type funding, adding, “it’s not on anyone’s radar right now.”

A blanket of fresh powder that had been dumped the night before gave

way to stunningly beautiful conditions on a recent day in Park City:

nothing but blue skies and sunshine on a crisp, windless 25-degree day.

A steady line of skiers and snowboarders hopped off the chairlift and

wasted little time before dropping into the park to skid atop railings,

go flying off ramps or leap into the halfpipe. Some carry video cameras

to film friends, others have them affixed to their helmets, one of which

bears the message: "Live Free or Die," a paean either to New Hampshire

or the rush that comes with the sport.

Nevertheless, it was a reminder of how much interpretation is at the heart of the sport, no matter your level.

“It’s like what an artist does with a paint brush, they do with their

body,” said Nick Cummings, who was stationed at the bottom of the

halfpipe, critiquing the skiers he coaches at Westminster College of

Salt Lake City. “Everybody has their own style.”

While there might be distinctive flair in the way people ride and in

the way they dress, when it comes to whether there were any lessons to

be learned by Burke’s death and Pearce’s life-altering crash, they were

of a single thought: Don’t change a thing.

In interviews with more than a dozen people, the reasons were manifold:

• Pearce and Burke wore helmets, which was a sign they were not being

reckless. (There was little consideration given to the idea that helmets

might be manufactured to provide more protection.)

• Burke landed on her feet, then lost her balance and hit her head,

severing an artery. Thus, her accident was described as somewhat of a

fluke.

• More people are killed in avalanches, often a result of unnecessary risk taking, but that is rarely reported upon.

• The halfpipe at Park City Mountain Resort is carefully calibrated and

diligently monitored, making it much safer than others around the

country.

But the bottom line seemed to be this:

“I don’t want to have contests dumbed down,” said Sean Kaldhusdal, who

works at Powder Huffer, a popular freeski accessory store, when he isn’t

on the slopes. “You can’t put a trapeze net on the side of the

halfpipe. It’s an extreme sport for a reason. There are extreme

consequences.”

Later, it was not hard to think about this conversation while watching

some skiers and snowboarders fly off ramps and over the edge of the

halfpipe, artfully contorting their bodies and spinning upside down two

stories above a surface that felt as dense as cement.

Somewhere, logic suggests, there has to be another Kevin Pearce or

Sarah Burke out there. It’s one thing to defy gravity, another to defy

the odds.

Link To Article:http://msn.foxsports.com/olympics/s...aves-hard-questions-for-extreme-sports-020812

Absolutely Disgusting, Makes me sick to my stomach to read. Billy witz has no place in skiing.

*SB'd did not find anything, if it's a repost let it die. My apologies.

*Saw this on ahmets FB,

 
completly unrelated, but why do you have the evolve logo in your forum picture, do they have camps in edmonton too?
 
Oh look. Another article written by another journalist that knows absolutely nothing about action sports and skiing critiquing and criticizing it.
 
not trying to piss people off here, but what specific points do people disagree with? sounds like he just is trying to speak objectivly about safety. there are always more ways we can push safety and seems reasonable to do so as the sport progresses and becomes more dangerous.
 
Now that I've calmed down and re-read the article, I don't disagree with what he's saying. Most of it is true, and makes sense in a way. I just dislike how he writes as if he knows, has experienced the thrills, the highs, the lows, that feeling when you stomp a new trick, that can only be achieved through skiing when he hasn't. Thats what annoys me.
 
this article wasn't bad at all he seemed pretty objective, and took both arguments into account
 
i agree completely. all he asked was rhetorical questions about safety, what was so completely wrong with anything he wrote? plus, i didn't see one instance that he claimed, or even insinuated, to "understand our sport".

easy fellas. take a deep breath, re-read it.
 
Actually there was already a thread on this very article and you made ignorant comments in that one too. But i'm not surprised that this article seems new to you. I can tell you read it with outstanding comprehension.

https://www.newschoolers.com/ns/forums/readthread/thread_id/676272/

 
im just gonna overlook that this has been posted at least 3 times, but for real it wasnt that bad at all. i think he definitely asked some good questions.

looking at our sport from the outside, we look fucking nuts! sometimes we need someone to remind us exactly what we're getting into.
 
Back
Top