Anthyms

they are 10mm wider then the invaders underfoot and they are a little bit stiffer but they have the same flex points, I demoed them and I wasnt that impressed with them but there not really my kind of ski in the first place.
 
the invaders and anthems are like the fujas and PEs. invaders and fujas for park and PEs and anthems are fatter and more for all mountain...at least thats what i think...invaders-83mm waist.... ..anthems-93mm waist
 
does that really matter if they are symmetric? and they definitely are a soft ski, i will promise you that
 
the anthems are soft,but they are not as soft as fujis, they are for park, and booters, the flex points make it softer but the rest isn't that bad, it also depends on your weight, if you're light they would work well all mountain, if not they will be pretty much park and powder.
 
i wouldnt think that the true center mount would effect the skis all mountain performance if it was designed to be mounted there because it isnt messing up the sidecut or turning radius or anything. i just thought the only thing that would really effect the all mountain stuff is the softness of the ski.
 
Here's an idea; Don't post unless you know your shit. What you just said is completely wrong. As I've skied both, Anthems are the EXACT same ski as the invaders, simply with a 10mm wider waist (93mm instead of the invaders 83). Learn your shit kid.
 
i'm pretty sure it was all around they added 10 mm, not just the waist...that would almost make the ski have no sidecut from how you described it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top