Anthems vs Thrusters vs El Rey's

[ScriptMedia]

Can't decided between the three, going to get something soon and could use some help with my selection. Im 6'3 and ski mainly park but do love to hit up the backcountry booter, and hit up some powder.

 

[chazz.]

if you want some info on how the anthems are i just posted a review on it yesterday, might find that helpful in your decision making...

 

[InfernoHits]

I hear the anthems are amazing for all-mountain and park but are also 93 underfoot which would be awesome for somem BC booters too. At getboards.com they have a promo-video for them if you click the anthem ski

 

[skinnylove]

El Rey's are a lot fatter in person than I expected them to be. They have potential in the pow I'd say.

 

[skiP.E.I.]

I wouldn't get the thrusters.

 

[a.jamieson]

why not the thrusters? I would say dont go for the el rey's they're mostly for all mountain and not pow at all..

 

[deezy.]

anthems cause of the underfoot

 

[Fish_Sandwich.]

Anthems, but they only come in 178, that might be too small.

 

[deezy.]

they come in 161 too... just to tell

 

[Rippy087]

anthems are rediculously noodly though, might not be too good all mountain/bc, depends on what you prefer

 

[chazz.]

have you ever even skied anthems?? cuz if you havent then you are an idiot to be talking. read my review i said already, the anthems are not noodles...

 

[KRAMPUSNTROLLZ]

What is with all the 6'3'' people lately, i would say you should get the Anthems they are a really good ski they are built for park but are 93mm under foot so you can ride them out of the park in crud and pow deffinately the best ski out of the three you listed for backcountry kickers.

 

[chazz.]

hey man, im 6'3" as well.

i ride 178 anthems, center mount.

=amazing!

 

[ScriptMedia]

thanks madpow for the great review, i think that i might just have to go with anthems after all. thanks for your help.