Although Tanner Hall's comments may be seen as controversial or misguided, the firestorm of negative response, especially from the Denver Post’s own John Meyer, has been malicious and inappropriately personal, has consistently failed to address the main issue that Tanner raises, and has further compounded the deep insecurity that many (not all) alpine racers have towards new school freestyle skiing. It is on the balance of these three reasons that, in my opinion, Tanner has an arguable point.
First, with respect to the malicious and inappropriately personal comments made by John Meyer, Daron Rahlves and Chris Anthony, among others, they do nothing to help the alpine viewpoint, and instead only hurt it. Much of the anger and ferocity of the racers’ attack on Tanner was due to his comment that racers, in general, “ain’t gonna be nothing� in 10 years. Regardless of whether Tanner is bang-on right or is way off in left field, vicious personal attacks do not address the substance of his assertion and call into question the credibility of the attackers. As put by Rahlves, “he’s not educated, he’s young and he’s in his own little freeskier world.� While in some cases education and age are elements of an opinion, they are certainly not prerequisites in an instance where the opinion giver is one of the top in his field. Further, to suggest that being part of the “freeskier world� somehow makes one less qualified to give an opinion on the sport of skiing defies logic and common sense. John Meyer, the Denver Post columnist, has essentially labeled Tanner a moronic and idiotic high school dropout who hangs out with kids that do nothing but congratulate themselves on how “hip and brave� they are. Maybe Meyer should ask someone like Bill Gates or Larry Ellison for an opinion on cutting short one’s education to pursue a dream. Likewise, maybe he should talk to these other “kids�, many of whom came from one Olympic sport (competitive moguls) to a potentially new one (halfpipe skiing), as to whether they do nothing but talk about how hip they are. Chris Anthony, the “big-mountain freeskier� who is somehow qualified in Meyer’s mind to comment on new school freestyle, probably takes the cake with his opinion that “Rahlves has more talent in his little finger than Hall has in his entire body.� Why does Meyer think we all need to hear what an ex-racer with some Warren Miller appearances under his belt has to say about how gnarly downhill courses are when such an opinion is the last thing from being applicable to new school freestyle? Ignorance in some cases is bliss, but in this case it’s simply an opinionated rant.
Second, I have yet to hear any discussion of the actual issue that Mike Douglas put to Tanner, and which Tanner gave his opinion: the gross imbalance of athletes’ contracts within the sport of skiing. Tanner’s opinion on racing’s elite bagging multi-million dollar contracts while new school’s up and coming superstars are lucky to get some equipment and a few trips paid for is that it’s “bullshit�. Free market analyses aside, he may have a good point. It wasn’t long ago that one particular athlete in another winter sport spent his whole career making a modest salary while at the same time he spent four decades having his body punished in one of the world’s fastest and most demanding sports. At the end of this athlete’s career, and much to his shock, he was informed that his teammates, who in some cases were inferior athletes, were making up to 10 times what he was making. The athlete’s name was Gordie Howe – one of the greatest hockey players in history – and one of the results of this turn of events was the creation the NHL Players Association. Although unions aren’t necessarily the answer to every dispute, and are more than likely not needed in the case of skiing, they nevertheless keep big business honest and the athletes’ financial interests preserved and not abused. All that Tanner and the other freestyle skiers ask is to get a fair shake. If they’re putting their health on the line every day and risking serious injury in competition and at photo-shoots, while at the same time helping to bring in huge revenues for ski manufacturers in the twin tip market, then in return their contracts ought to be commensurate with these factors. One would think that Mike Douglas and the New Canadian Air Force should be rolling in money as a result of their spearheading of the Salomon 1080 revolution, but they’re not, and such situations must not be repeated.
Lastly, the firestorm from Meyer, Rahlves, Anthony and others only compounds the already insecure feeling amongst many alpine racers. As much as racers try to deny it, the facts speak for themselves: racing is declining in popularity. It would not surprise me if the very statistics that Meyer cites regarding the increase in USSA membership are due to increased interest in snowboarding and freestyle programs. Just ask Phil Sims, the outspoken and blunt owner of Sims Snowboards who is ironically himself responsible for a deluge of skiers making the switch to snowboarding years ago. Today, he bitches and complains about skiing’s resurgence in popularity, but you can rest assured he’s not referring to any loss of snowboarders to ski racing. Indeed, I don’t think that I have ever seen a freestyle skier get fed up with skiing pipe and make the switch to racing. In contrast, I see skiers in droves abandoning their alpine race programs for twin tip skis and full days of sessioning their local terrain park. Indeed, it is traditional freestyle skiing that provides athletes with both the fundamentals in carving AND jumping, and is responsible for the vast majority of today’s new school freestyle superstars. The fact is that there are many athletes who are not interested in spending zillions of dollars towards shaving two one hundredths of a second off of their GS time when they could be enjoying an entirely different essence in skiing: an essence that is more appropriately aligned with such sports as surfing, skateboarding and snowboarding. The pursuit of such an essence does not make these athletes any less “skiers�. Regardless of the length of their ski and the slope – or rail – they ride, these athletes have two boards strapped below their feet and perform feats not even dreamt of a few years ago. Sadly, comments like Rahlves’ that new school freestyle is not skiing because “jumping on rails is more like Rollerblades� and is “the same thing over and over again� show the truly desperate nature of some racers’ insecurity towards the freestyle side of skiing and the deeply ignorant and flawed reasoning of such arguments. Meyer himself fails to grasp this defective reasoning when he admits that he can’t watch “freeskiing� for long “without his eyes glazing over.� I wonder if he ever put himself in the freeskier’s shoes with respect to watching a downhill event on television.
In sum, the past six years or so of new school skiing growth is not a trend that is on the way out as Meyer and so many other racers would rejoice in, but is an evolution that is permanent and only just begun. It goes without saying that many racers are tremendous athletes who excel at their particular specialties, but when key representatives from its community snap back at one new school skier’s remarks in a malicious and personal manner and without addressing that skier’s main point, then such a response only detracts from the racers’ message and proves the point that many of them are insecure about the new kids on the block. Rahlves couldn’t be more wrong when he says that it’s unfortunate that skiing in the U.S. is so focused on freestyle and the X-Games. Unquestionably, freestyle and the X-Games – not racing – have breathed new life into the sport of skiing. I’m sorry, Mr. Meyer, while you are certainly entitled to tell yourself and your kids that racing is cool again, this should not be done by relying on an irrational diatribe against the clear evidence of the appeal, excitement, phenomenal talent and surging popularity associated with new school freestyle skiing.