jimmychung
Active member
I apologize for another Clinton thread, but her attacks are just getting so desperate I can't even fucking believe it.
So, what are some of the problems I have with her?
1. She refuses to meet with "hostile foreign leaders" without "preconditions."
In a debate several months ago, the candidates were asked if they would agree to meet with foreign leaders during their first year in office. Obama said yes, Clinton said no. Her reasoning is to both try to persuade these foreign leaders to start "behaving" as a precondition, and also because according to her, these leaders use these meetings for "propaganda purposes." SHUT THE FUCK UP. Does she even have half a brain in her head? Preconditions? I believe that some of these "hostile" foreign leaders are not going to even consider to start listening to us until we take the time to actually meet with them and talk. What good will setting preconditions do? Why should they even follow them? I agree with Obama 100%, you need to meet with them before they even begin to listen to you. Preconditions won't do anything. The only way to get the ball rolling to solve the messes in the world is to meet and talk, and preconditions will only get in the way.
2. Her attacks blow
Can they even be considered attacks now? She sounds like a fucking 6th grader sometimes who's running out of comebacks. Here's a video of her mocking Obama's belief in the power of unity:
Way to go, bitch. Does any of that apply to anything that Obama has actually ever said? Absolutely not. I like to think that J.D, had he had the opportunity, would bash Clinton's arguing ability like he bashes kids on NS. Honestly, what a lame attempt to undermine Obama. Sure he believes in the power of a united nation, and why not? Certainly that can only help us. But did he ever say that that is all that's need to be done? Fucking NO. Of course not, shitbag. Way to ignore the rest of the truth because you know that it renders your argument useless.
Clinton continues her shitparade with this quote:
Clinton said Obama "wavers from seeming to believe that mediation and meetings without preconditions can solve some of the world's most intractable problems to advocating rash unilateral military action without cooperation from our allies in the most sensitive region of the world."
Again, what the fuck are you talking about? When did Obama EVER say that? The simple truth in
this area is that Obama is willing to talk more than Clinton. Obama has stated that he is certainly willing
to involve military action when it's necessary, he never said that diplomacy can solve everything.
However, it certainly helps, and it certainly should precede any physical conflict.
3. She needs to get her priorities straight
I've had this problem with her for awhile, but a recent thread brought this issue back up with me. Clinton
gets a major chubby whenever she thinks about bitching out video game content. She has been a long
advocator for the banning and censoring inappropriate video games. She thinks its a major issue that
needs to be taken care of. But is this something our federal government should be losing sleep over?
Isn't this more a concern for the parents of children? You don't find anything worse in video games than
you do in movies, why not ban the movies too, bitch? Anyone who actually imitates what they see on
video games must already have some instability, as said in the thread on this subject. The rating system
is enough to regulate these games as long as they're enforced. The point is that this should not be a
subject discussed in Washington, it should be discusses at home parents to children. It does nothing but
waste government spending that already is extremely wasteful.
End rant, I apologize again but I needed to get this off my chest. Peace.
So, what are some of the problems I have with her?
1. She refuses to meet with "hostile foreign leaders" without "preconditions."
In a debate several months ago, the candidates were asked if they would agree to meet with foreign leaders during their first year in office. Obama said yes, Clinton said no. Her reasoning is to both try to persuade these foreign leaders to start "behaving" as a precondition, and also because according to her, these leaders use these meetings for "propaganda purposes." SHUT THE FUCK UP. Does she even have half a brain in her head? Preconditions? I believe that some of these "hostile" foreign leaders are not going to even consider to start listening to us until we take the time to actually meet with them and talk. What good will setting preconditions do? Why should they even follow them? I agree with Obama 100%, you need to meet with them before they even begin to listen to you. Preconditions won't do anything. The only way to get the ball rolling to solve the messes in the world is to meet and talk, and preconditions will only get in the way.
2. Her attacks blow
Can they even be considered attacks now? She sounds like a fucking 6th grader sometimes who's running out of comebacks. Here's a video of her mocking Obama's belief in the power of unity:
Way to go, bitch. Does any of that apply to anything that Obama has actually ever said? Absolutely not. I like to think that J.D, had he had the opportunity, would bash Clinton's arguing ability like he bashes kids on NS. Honestly, what a lame attempt to undermine Obama. Sure he believes in the power of a united nation, and why not? Certainly that can only help us. But did he ever say that that is all that's need to be done? Fucking NO. Of course not, shitbag. Way to ignore the rest of the truth because you know that it renders your argument useless.
Clinton continues her shitparade with this quote:
Clinton said Obama "wavers from seeming to believe that mediation and meetings without preconditions can solve some of the world's most intractable problems to advocating rash unilateral military action without cooperation from our allies in the most sensitive region of the world."
Again, what the fuck are you talking about? When did Obama EVER say that? The simple truth in
this area is that Obama is willing to talk more than Clinton. Obama has stated that he is certainly willing
to involve military action when it's necessary, he never said that diplomacy can solve everything.
However, it certainly helps, and it certainly should precede any physical conflict.
3. She needs to get her priorities straight
I've had this problem with her for awhile, but a recent thread brought this issue back up with me. Clinton
gets a major chubby whenever she thinks about bitching out video game content. She has been a long
advocator for the banning and censoring inappropriate video games. She thinks its a major issue that
needs to be taken care of. But is this something our federal government should be losing sleep over?
Isn't this more a concern for the parents of children? You don't find anything worse in video games than
you do in movies, why not ban the movies too, bitch? Anyone who actually imitates what they see on
video games must already have some instability, as said in the thread on this subject. The rating system
is enough to regulate these games as long as they're enforced. The point is that this should not be a
subject discussed in Washington, it should be discusses at home parents to children. It does nothing but
waste government spending that already is extremely wasteful.
End rant, I apologize again but I needed to get this off my chest. Peace.
