''black people use the past 2 decades of horrible treatment as an excuse that they should be allowed into harvard even if they dicked off during highschool.''
That is fucking priceless. Atlantaski, you've done it again. Hahahahaha...
Anyways, from a purely theoretical standpoint, Affirmative action is wrong for a number of reasons. Firstly, while it might help individual people in certain cases to overcome racial discrimination, the opposite (wherein the minority is hired over the more competent majority member) is becoming more and more prevalent, to the point where the two cancel each other out, and there's no benefit. There might even be a deficit in utility, it's hard to calculate these things. Secondly, it reinforces the racial barriers that everyone's trying to overcome, and cements the inherently racist notion that 'these people are different from these people', which really should be counterintuitive. Thirdly, from the deontological standpoint, the act itself, of giving a person a leg up for arbitrary reasons, is wrong and inconsistent. We can see this by universalizing the maxim: if we were to hire peopl based on any arbitrary reason, there would be no point in having a screening process at all. So that covers both major schools of moral thought. Both say it's wrong.
That being said, it may still be practical to attempt to ingrain the idea of equal opportunity in the workplace, as most workplaces are still far from equal (note how few woen still hold higher-up positions). It just seems illogical to try to promote equal opportunity by denying equal opportunity, if you see what I mean.
------------
In a haze
A stormy haze
I’ll be around
I’ll be loving you
Always
Always
Here I am
And I’ll take my time
Here I am
And I’ll wait in line
Always
Always...