a question for democrats ...

he isnt really very liberal at all.

- Thats the biggest crock of shit I ever heard, look at his senate voting...

kerry wants to raise taxes. but only on people making over 200 grand a year. do you know how much that is? my dad makes right around there and we definetly dont need that much and shouldnt be making that much.

- You dont need that money? And he shouldnt be making that much? Do you even realize what you are saying? There is never enough money... Why would you want to give your money away when your dad can save money so there will be enough for you and your kids after your dad is gone, you will have enough money to do what you always wanted to do with your life and your family is going to be financially stabled for generations, I'm not saying you cant do it without money, but holy shit man why would you give it away to uncle sam...

do you think that people like me should have a trust fund or to you think that people who are poor should have health insurance?

You cant provide every poor person with health insurance with taxes from rich people, its just fucking impossible, so guess where the rest of the money is going to have to come from... 'MIDDLE CLASS'... There are plenty of programs already set up to help people with health insurance, its called medicare and last time I checked they were handing those out to illigal immigrants from Mexico and driver licences oh and a right to vote for the next president (I wonder who they are going to vote for) you get where this is going...

-People say marijuana ruins your life, I just say I take the scenic route-

 
'' he isnt really very liberal at all.

- Thats the biggest crock of shit I ever heard, look at his senate voting... ''

You know, before you tell someone else to do something, maybe you should try it for yourself. Go ahead, look at his voting record. As far as democrats go, it's pretty moderate. Regardless of what the President's campaign says, he is far right of Ted Kennedy.

'' There is never enough money... ''

Yeah, great attitude. He's clearly an idiot for being even slightly selfless. The correct way to behave would be to try to accumulate as much wealth as possible at the expense of anyone and everyone. Thanks for that moral lesson, Buddha. Please read this (I know you won't... since when do people actually seek to better themselves), I posted it a while ago, but apparently you were too busy doing pointless things to bother with it.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
bush has done an incredible job running our country. kerry just wants to raise taxes, save the trees, and let terrorists kill our countrY by not going to war!? he's a moron. bush has proven in the past 4 years in office that he is tough, strong and definitely the right person for the job. the other day in afghanistan they had a PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. a WOMAN was running!!!!! their country would still suck right now if it wasnt for bush.

if you want to make a terrible mistake and let a moron hippie run our country, vote for kerry. but bush is the way to go. hes the right guy for the job.

Wow, what else is there to say. i guess somebody that doesnt inform themselves, or watch the debates would beleive this. Kerry wants to put taxes back where they wewre, because Bush cut takes( a politically friendly move ), we are in a historically massive amount of debt. In the past four years in office, Bush has proven that politics are more important to him than human lives. Shit, now if he gets re-elected and has nothing to lose, i am fearful of what may happen. And to call him a moron, the person who made it to a prestigious college on his own, unlike bush who's daddy hooked him up, the person who got great grades all the way through school, unlike bush who drank and barely got by, is just arrogant.

I guess you have proven to be selfish, and not care about the future of anybody else, except us. you dont care about the environment, which will have a major impact on your grandchildren, if not their children, other country's health and wellbeing. As for the war on terror, dont even mention irag, maybe mention how we shifted focus after bush gave his word that he would track down osama bin laden. So, if you like being lied to, about how there is wmd's, fighting terrorism, and your education, sure vote bush. the more power to ya.

**************************************************************************

If i lived in a perfect world, i would spend my days skiing in the sun, the party never ends in perfect world. Nacho cheese and anarchy, boy that sure sounds good to me, im ready to move into a perfect world.

NS ARMY, whatever is right below the General

 
'The correct way to behave would be to try to accumulate as much wealth as possible at the expense of anyone and everyone.'

I dont even know what to say about that idiotic comment of yours, holy shit man, your genious ideas are blowing me away...

-People say marijuana ruins your life, I just say I take the scenic route-

 
^I was being sarcastic, you idiot. Your policy of 'There's never enough money so keep it for yourself' entails exactly that: doing whatever's necessary to get more lucre, no matter who's rendered destitute as a result. Jesus, some people are dense.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
the funny thing is that you keep telling us foreigners to mind our own business. If we dont live in the US then we dont have an opinion...

Well Im sorry but you country tends to rule the fucking world...you have your hands in so many cookie jars, your influence tends to annoy the fuck out of others. If your influence controls our trends, our gas, our news, our LIVES, then I think we should be fair to have our own opinion on who gets re-elected.

When in doubt...FSI

...fuckin send it

work to live...not live to work.

work to ski...but only if you ski to work. The simple equation to skibumming 101
 
another thing...the saudis have so much money invested in your country, if they were to take out it all in one withdrawl, that is 7% of your economy, and that would be a massive blow to your economy, thus affecting ours, and many other countries in the world.

When in doubt...FSI

...fuckin send it

work to live...not live to work.

work to ski...but only if you ski to work. The simple equation to skibumming 101
 
guys i got to tell you one thing: if many countries hate you, it's coz we are jealous of you!!! who ever heard of a french or polish dream??? nobody!!

and really, out of the fatc that kerry wouldn't even be able to say 'no' to a 5 years old child, you do not know what left hand is!!

in france, rich people can have 85% taxes on their income. average people work almost 2 days per week for the state, for taxes. 75% is our taxes on oil.

we are a liberal country and now people are sick of it and want less taxes. Kerry is retarded, but america has time to see other people become as strong as them

*******************

PUNK'S NOT DEAD!

RAILS SUCK!

POWDER SKIING RULES!

DEATH TO SNOWBOARD-ERS!!

VOTE BUSH!!
 
if bush is such a great president as you say then wouldnt the economy be at same height as it was under clinton and if he is such a good president wouldnt he do something about it ? when clinton was president oil was cheap very cheap bushs focus on his 'war on terror' has let the national issues deteriorate what about the flu vaccine shortage wouldnt a good president get help from an ally such as canada to put a halt to it ? he certainly hasnt... what about the us backing out of the kyoto agreement under bush what does that send to other countries? did you ever think of that? it seems not... a good president wouldnt have sat in a classroom in florida reading some kindergarten book while our country was being attacked... Clinton cheated on his wife while in office.... Bush goes to war and kills 1000+ of our own not including the 20000+ iraqi civillians that have died... Who is worse?

no snow..

no girls..

no future..

Snowfall dictates the days activities if its snowing do it another day...
 
wow, noone knows about clinton and what he did to this country.

read a little:

-legacy

-unlimited access

-let freedom ring

-hig crimes and misdemeanors

-delerliction of duty

unlimtied access and dereliction of duty are both written by insiders of the clinton white house , and are incredibly eye-opening

also, it takes time for the econmoy to turn, so most of what went wrong happened under clinton, and wasnt felt till bush

-Joe

______________________________________

'Really, I gotta say that I'm glad you exist, 'cause if there wasn't there'd be noone to make fun of and diss.'

Solider in the NS ARMY

Rollers of NS unite!!!

603 for life

I'm conservative, just so you all know.

Member Number: 5172

Golden Wheel Chair Award 2004-09-21

 
sure bush went to war but in teh end iraq is gonna end up better..we had to take sadaam out and this was a good reason to...the real goal was to get him out not wmds

IPOD
 
LineSkogenHun...: do yopu really beleive the world economy depends on the US president?

much more from the fed! and clinton supported artificially the growth so that it was worst when he left (quote from my economy teacher)

*******************

PUNK'S NOT DEAD!

RAILS SUCK!

POWDER SKIING RULES!

DEATH TO SNOWBOARD-ERS!!

VOTE BUSH!!
 
Really a lot of the 'Bush Problems' are backlash from poor Clinton decisions, mainly the economy and 9/11 (not totally but he did have several occasions to take bin Laden out)

Politicaly Active Since 1992

'Soberity is not an option.'

Drivin that Train
 
anti-american sentiment is at an all time high. everybody hates us. we need a better symbol of america.

..:: d a n c e y o u f u c k e r s ! ::..
 
Biggest reqason i will not vote Bush... Iraq. This was not the right time to do it nor did he have a good enough plan to stablilize Iraq, extremely poor planning by bush. To shift our focus from the war on terrorism to iraq, poor play! Iraqs borders did not let terrorists in undr saddam (was he a good guy no but was his country harboring terrorists, NO) now iraq is being overrun by terrorists. Hmm war on terror eh? lets go demolish a country so they can then get in there and have there way... way to go Bush!

 
^ Perfect Example of Kerry-Brain-Washing, damn man you nailed it perfectly... congratulations...

-People say marijuana ruins your life, I just say I take the scenic route-

 
Clinton is the cause for the debt and 9/11? You've got to be fucking kidding me. you don't think that, perhaps, the gross total amount of debt is in any way shape or form due to the war in Iraq? Pull your head out of your ass. This war has cost more money than i can fathom. Bush could give a fuck, because he's padding his pockets quite well, along with all his other buddies. Yes, Clinton might have been able to find Bin Laden, but on the flipside, Bush totally ignored documents that contained information on a possible terrorist attack within the U.S. (can we say, 9/11?) Bush fucked up, bigtime.

'Hey-yo i'm gonna be on ti-dop, that's all my eyes can see, victory is mine, yeah suprisingly, i've been laying, waiting for your next mistake, i put in work, and watch my status escalate.'
 
word^ bro... if bush was so great and valiant as you say why didnt he go and stop the terrorists in august of 2001?. If you are voting for bush are you gonna vote for somebody who cant keep tight security on 380 tons of explosives that could set of a nuclear bomb? Dont believee me check this outhttp://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/25/iraq.explosives/index.html

for those of you too lazy read it here

(CNN) -- Some 380 tons of explosives powerful enough to detonate nuclear warheads are missing from a former Iraqi military facility that was supposed to be under American control, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog says.

Melissa Fleming, spokeswoman for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CNN the interim Iraqi government reported several days ago that the explosives were missing from the Al Qaqaa complex, south of Baghdad.

The explosives -- considered powerful enough to demolish buildings or detonate nuclear warheads -- were under IAEA control until the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003. IAEA workers left the country before the fighting began.

'Our immediate concern is that if the explosives did fall into the wrong hands they could be used to commit terrorist acts and some of the bombings that we've seen,' Fleming said.

She described Al Qaqaa as 'massive' and said it is one of the most well-known storage sites. Besides the 380 tons, there were large caches of artillery there.

Fleming said the IAEA does not know whether some of the explosives may have been used in past attacks.

The multinational force in Iraq and the Bush administration's Iraq Survey Group have been ordered to 'look into' the disappearance of the explosives, a senior Pentagon official said.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said President Bush wants to determine what went wrong.

McClellan, on Air Force One, stressed that the missing explosives were not nuclear materials, and said the storage site was the responsibility of the interim Iraqi government, not the United States, as of June 28, when the United States turned over the nation's administration to the Iraqis.

McClellan said the Iraqi government reported the missing weaponry to the IAEA on October 10, and the IAEA informed the U.S. mission in Vienna on October 15. National security adviser Condoleezza Rice was told a few days later, then informed the president.

According to the Pentagon official, coalition forces, who went to the area around Al Qaqaa in the months after the war ended, searched 32 bunkers and 87 other buildings. They found no weapons of mass destruction, but indications of looting.

The discovery was not made public sooner because standard intelligence practice is not to let enemies know such information, said a senior administration official.

There are hundreds of tons of other weapons and munitions missing around the country, and it is impossible for the United States to track down all of them, the official said.

Even so, he conceded, the story is not a good one for the White House, just over a week from Election Day.

Threat from terrorists

A European diplomat told The New York Times that Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the IAEA, is 'extremely concerned' about the potentially 'devastating consequences' of the vanished stockpile.

'The immediate danger' of the lost stockpiles is its potential use by insurgents to make small, but powerful, bombs, an expert told the Times. The expert said the explosives could be transported easily across the Middle East.

According to the Times, the stockpiles missing from Al Qaqaa are the strongest and fastest in common use by militaries around the globe.

The Iraqi letter to IAEA identified the vanished explosives as containing 194.7 metric tons of HMX, or 'high melting point explosive,' 141.2 metric tons of RDX, or 'rapid detonation explosive,' among other designations, and 5.8 metric tons of PETN, or 'pentaerythritol tetranitrate.'

Fleming said the IAEA, whose mission is to keep track of everything with potential nuclear weapons applications, had been monitoring about 100 sites in Iraq, but there were only a few of special concern, including Al Qaqaa.

'The concern is that other sites that have items that are potentially dangerous have gone missing,' Fleming added.

The senior administration official downplayed the importance of the missing explosives, describing them as dangerous material but 'stuff you can buy anywhere.' The official added that the administration did not see this necessarily as a 'proliferation risk.'

'In the grand scheme -- and on a grand scale -- there are hundreds of tons of weapons, munitions, artillery, explosives that are unaccounted for in Iraq,' the official said. 'And like the Pentagon has said, there is really no way the U.S. military could safeguard all of these weapons depots or find all of these missing materials.'

The official said the Iraq Survey Group, the administration's weapons investigators, concluded that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, and documented the scope of the problem.

and like clinton said today at a rally for kerry only a good president will change his/her mind when new information is learned.. read up on bush and his policies going to war only benifits his family and his friends and his intrests.. hes not helping any of us at all

no snow..

no girls..

no future..

Snowfall dictates the days activities if its snowing do it another day...
 
Can someone please tell me the last time that we went to war and said, 'wow, that was perfect, there was no way we could have done that better.' Or any country that did that, for the matter.

I was born, a six gun in my hand...they call me Bad Company

We're the dream warriors! Don't wanna dream no more!--Dokken
 
Can someone please tell me the last time that we went to war and said, 'wow, that was perfect, there was no way we could have done that better.' Or any country that did that, for the matter.

I was born, a six gun in my hand...they call me Bad Company

We're the dream warriors! Don't wanna dream no more!--Dokken
 
Can someone please tell me the last time that we went to war and said, 'wow, that was perfect, there was no way we could have done that better.' Or any country that did that, for the matter.

I was born, a six gun in my hand...they call me Bad Company

We're the dream warriors! Don't wanna dream no more!--Dokken
 
^Afghanistan was pretty well executed. As was Gulf War I. Not perfect, but the results were about as good as could have been expected.

------------

In a haze

A stormy haze

I’ll be around

I’ll be loving you

Always

Always

Here I am

And I’ll take my time

Here I am

And I’ll wait in line

Always

Always...
 
Just got this from one of my old high school teachers. I dont agree with everything and would like to see some facts, but here it is, tear it apart, both sides:

I believe that President Bush has done a poor job as

president for the past four years.

These are some reasons why he should not be

re-elected.

Lack of fiscal responsibility

Bush came into office inheriting an enormous federal

surplus and has turned it into the biggest deficit our

country has ever seen. He claims that he will “spend

whatever it takes to win the war on terror” and at the

same time is approving tax breaks. Funding a war is

always a costly endeavor and we should be making

sacrifices to pay for it, like previous presidents

have asked of American citizens. George W. is the

first president to ever give a tax cut while we were

at war. We are putting these expenses on our nationÂ’s

credit card without any plan to pay off the bill. He

is taking advantage of our children by expecting them

to pay for his actions.

Bush favors the wealthy

BushÂ’s policies and tax cuts favor the wealthiest of

Americans. Like most Americans, I received a check

for $300, which did nothing to improve my financial

situation or stimulate the economy. The richest one

percent of Americans, on the other hand, are receiving

millions in tax breaks. His original plan did not

even offer a tax break to the poorest Americans and

would have gone into effect if there was not a

national outcry at how ridiculously unfair it was.

Unwise energy policy

Bush and CheneyÂ’s energy policy was secretly

developed behind closed doors with only members of the

petroleum industry present. It should be of no

surprise that the final product heavily favors the use

of oil, gas and coal. At a time when we should be

decreasing our dependence on oil from the Middle East,

their energy policy only makes us more dependent.

Misled the US into invading Iraq

Bush claimed that Saddam Hussein posed an imminent

threat to the United States, possessed weapons of mass

destruction and had links to Al Qaeda He used the

fear generated by September 11th to convince the US

that Iraq must be invaded. We have since found out

that there were no weapons of mass destruction and

even Donald Rumsfeld has stated that there was no link

between Saddam and Al Qaeda. Even with out current

knowledge, Bush claims that the invasion was justified

based on that argument.

“Clean Sky” initiative

BushÂ’s administration has come up with policies that

also have misleading titles. Even the US EPA has

determined that the recent Clean Air Act revisions are

a big benefit to polluters. The Clean Sky initiative

will not make our skies cleaner.

“Healthy Forests” initiative

The Healthy Forests initiative promotes more logging

on our National Forests under the guise of “thinning”

the forests to make them healthier. Bush wants to

repeal the Roadless Rule to allow logging in the small

amount of untouched forests remaining in the US.

Global Warming

Bush is ignoring the problem of Global Warming and

refuses to sign the Kyoto Protocol. While the rest of

the world is figuring out what they can do to reduce

greenhouse gas emissions, Bush is placing the problem

in the hands of our children.

Lower Air and Water Quality

Several EPA officials have resigned in protest of

BushÂ’s policies, which make it more difficult for the

EPA to enforce environmental regulations with

industrial polluters.

Bush receives an F

Bush is the only president to ever receive a grade of

an “F” from the League of Conservation Voters

Expensive prescription drugs

The free market economy encourages Wal-Mart to buy in

bulk to save money.

Bush has made it illegal for Medicare to use its

purchasing power to negotiate buying cheaper drugs for

Americans. He has also blocked the option of

purchasing cheaper drugs from Canada. Large

pharmaceutical companies benefit from these policies

while Americans suffer.

No Child Left Behind

No Child Left Behind leaves behind millions of

children because it sets high standards for schools to

meet without providing the necessary funding for

programs required to improve student performance.

Leads by Fear

BushÂ’s administration has worked hard since September

11th at keeping the country in a constant state of

fear. Their hope is that we will place blind faith in

them to keep us safe from the evildoers of the world.

They’ve created a culture where it is “Un-American” to

question their policies.

It is time to openly question the Bush

Administration's policies.

I believe that John Kerry will be a better leader for

America. While not perfect, he will be much better

the George W. Bush.

Please make sure to vote next Tuesday, November 2nd.

Encourage everyone around you to vote as well.

=================================

Rowen

'Aren't you Buzz Lightyear?'

*whispers* 'I love your movies!'

'URAAAAFWAAAGAAA!!!'

 
thats well written i believe as it does bring up valid points.

no snow..

no girls..

no future..

Snowfall dictates the days activities if its snowing do it another day...
 
sorry didn't read all that, but I have to make a comment on this entry which is one of the most fucking retarded comments people can make: 'Bush favors the wealthy

Bushís policies and tax cuts favor the wealthiest of

Americans. Like most Americans, I received a check

for $300, which did nothing to improve my financial

situation or stimulate the economy. The richest one

percent of Americans, on the other hand, are receiving

millions in tax breaks. His original plan did not

even offer a tax break to the poorest Americans and

would have gone into effect if there was not a

national outcry at how ridiculously unfair it was.

'

First of all, of course the top 1 percent is going to recieve millions of dollars returned, they pay billions dollars in taxes. If someone pays 10% on a 20,000 dollar salary and someone pays 50% on a 120, 000, 000 dollar salary. and each gets 10% of their taxes back ... guess who gets more back? DUH!!! Everyone wants tax refunds, the democrats even want to give tax refunds to people who don't even pay taxes ... what the fuck is up with that?! (actually they may already get money) Everyone wants an equal amount of money back ... so how about everyone pays the same amount of taxes? how bout everyone only pays 10% ... would that be fair? I think it would be more fair if middle class people like my siblings, parents and myself in two years don't have to pay somewhere around +30% in taxes.

Anyone that uses that argument obviously has absolutely NO concept of math and is a complete indiot, and thus a detriment to mankind and human civilization as we know it.

I was born, a six gun in my hand...they call me Bad Company

We're the dream warriors! Don't wanna dream no more!--Dokken
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top