"9/11" You Must See This Video!

^jflo453 did a good job analyzing.

i agree that the first vid was definitely not that well supported. all he did was tell us that the government was behind 9/11. although he had some provocative scientific data, he still comes through as someone who is shooting accusations at the government and media conglomerates. he points his finger without providing significant data that pinpoints the "perpetrators" as the true culprits.
 
Even if this guys theories would be real nobody had listen what he really is trying to say.

Bush is a sick fuckin president if this actually would be real!

Peace
 
that guy is such a tool. If you've read anything published by structual engineers you would've known that because the size of towers and the cost. and thats all i'll say cause im going skiing. This is classic retard bullshit. All hes saying is Look look at me look at me, im retard. (if you back this person read published material with no connenction to news or gov.) Penn and tellar rule.
 
this is definately intriguing...all I have to say is I hope he's wrong...The only reason i find this government conspiracy possible is because of thier historical capabilities of doing something like this. Try reading the Norwood Document from 1969...officials suggested creating a "terror attack" in order to gain popular support and create a rationality for governmentally beneficial operatives... Hence, 9/11 = Iraq invasion
 
if 9/11 was done in order to invade iraq, then we would have immediately invaded iraq. Not waited over 20 months before even mentioning taking action in iraq. If iraq was the motive, we would have tried to invade as soon after 9/11 as possibly because thats when the support was at its greatest
 
may i interject for a second... there were eye witness reports from people running out of the building that say they saw and heard discharges on the ground and low levels of the WTC's.
 
Ok, so the government wanted an excuse. But why these three things? Pentagon, WTC and a field in PA?They dont connect. I can see the Pentagon, that was repaired fairly quickly and nothing valubal was lost really. But the WTC? That's just an insane proposition to make, that's just increasing the lives of American's taken.
 
they wanted to kill people, that was the point... and the one that landed in the feild was supposed to hit somewhere else, the people on the plane fought the terrorists
 
Will someone explain me why high temperatures in the rubble means explosives were used? what the fuck, this guy is an idiot
 
i think hes implying that such heat could only be generated using explosives, which is completely idiotic because aside from teh fact that tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel were burning for hours in the building nad in the rubble, the jet fuel also EXLOPDED on impact. That video is poorly made, obviously low budget, and is extremely vague in making points such as the one u just said and uses minimal scientific reasoning. Anyone who takes this serious is an idiot and the hwole concept is an insult to everyone who lives in and fights for America and everyone who lost their life on that day
 
you never know... the nazis bombed the riechstag then blamed it on the commies and took control of the country, i dont know why it couldnt happen again. in a century people will probably know the truth ... or everyone will be dead from nuclear war, its hard to say.
 
actually it does make sense. the plane crash mad eit look like an accident and everyone thinks that the government wouldnt make a mistake liek that
 
made it look like an accident? one plane...maybe...but more into the same two buildings? Give me a break. This is propoganda from the Anti-bush camp. So stupid. If you really want me to, one of my other sites had a massive discussion about this, the guy who started it with the same type of videos as this....got his ass handed to him.
 
when i started watching the video and the dude is talking about the explosives.....i could totally believe that sum sand niggers did that but once he said the united states government did it???? he sounded retared...why would OUR government kill thousands then go to war and kill thousands more??? SURE THERE MITE HAVE BEEN EXPLOSIVES USED but there is no way that it was the U.S.
 
In the first video he talks about how the building in Madrid stayed up while the world trde center didn't but the forgot to mention that they are built differently
 
of course he did, the guy is a fucking retard. Do you really think that running a plane or two into a building will not make it fall down adn go boom? He's a stupid twat.
 
they guy obviously fabricated some or most of it. there were only a couple good things that need to be explained but he throws out accusations like they're nothing. he better get some facts to back up the accusations
 
The best part is when keeps going on about how his points are based on "scientific facts" and are irrefutable. If it wasn't about a serious subject this (especially with his rediculous voice) would be hilarious
 
Adil...aside from the fact that ur a terrible person for even considering believing in this, and your even worse for posting it...explain to us for what reason you could possibly believe this crap
 
Okey dude!

First I didnt say I trust in this! But I thought it would be fun and a interesting movie for everyone!
 
maybe there were incriminating files in that portion of the building. to be upgrading the architectural security of the building there must be something of importance in that section.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top