DirtYStylE
Active member
omegalul
8chan was taken down
- Thread starter DirtYStylE
- Start date
how is that possible arent they behind 8 proxies
SuspiciousFish
Active member
The only internet they want is what is spoon fed to you through Google.
CabbyArrant
Member
14049852:TRVP_ANGEL said:
Doesn't matter if your hosting service pulls the plug or for that matter, your security providers hosting service.
GayWolf420
Active member
14049901:CabbyArrant said:
14049909:TRVP_ANGEL said:
good luck with that, I can hack the illuminati
T.L.
Active member
Do not go to the new 8ch that's being posted around. Bootleg honeypot.
https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1158897000470814721
https://twitter.com/CodeMonkeyZ/status/1158897000470814721
BigPurpleSkiSuit
Active member
Realistically, the only thing I liked better about 8chan was all WebMs there had sound. 4chan is superior except it's all gone to shit. So you're poking around in a mound of shit for that gold nugget
BigPurpleSkiSuit
Active member
Realistically, the only thing I liked better about 8chan was all WebMs there had sound. 4chan is superior except it's all gone to shit. So you're poking around in a mound of shit for that gold nugget
View attachment 937046
View attachment 937046
FruitBootPro
Active member
14049934:skierman said:
you sound kinda mad bro, you're shouting a bit too loud for me to understand you
FruitBootPro
Active member
Never been on 8chan but if it's an even more polarized version of 4chan then I would probably hate it.
Nevertheless I don't think it should necessarily be taken down because someone posted their manifesto on it an hour before the shooting.
Did he say that the site's posts motivated him to do it?
Remember when a guy streamed a shooting on FB live? Should Facebook be taken down then?
Or when that guy murdered his girlfriend and posted her nearly beheaded body on his Insta story?
Nevertheless I don't think it should necessarily be taken down because someone posted their manifesto on it an hour before the shooting.
Did he say that the site's posts motivated him to do it?
Remember when a guy streamed a shooting on FB live? Should Facebook be taken down then?
Or when that guy murdered his girlfriend and posted her nearly beheaded body on his Insta story?
skierman
Active member
14050118:buyfulltilts said:
"Durp I dun't pay enuf 'tention and didn't knoz multiplez racist mass shooters posted manifesteezies on 8chan and dudn't realize 8chan was used as gathering for mainly white supremists to share ideaz and to plan terrorist attacks"
You are the most ignorant mother fucker on this website.
FruitBootPro
Active member
14050152:skierman said:
k
GayWolf420
Active member
dude if they were to infiltrate places like 4chan (not that government agencies already havent), they'd come to find out that these individuals graduated into using other platforms to discuss this kind of stuff due to the moderation on there now because of things like this. its not like the early days of 4chan, the moderation and users would figure you out very quickly and youd get reported to agencies, they even have some filters set in place for posting that would report your post to the mods and is an autoban. this kind of stuff is why people started using 8chan more due to the more relaxed or lack of moderation. Reddit has even had their fair share of bad communities like this which lead to some insanely strict moderation as of late. even a few shooters were avid reddit users spouting their nonsensical shit.
its definitely a bit of a gateway for anyone wanting to commit a terrorist attack but they can just find workarounds. soo many fucked up things hide in plain sight on the internet. even on social media but there is just too much money tied up with advertising and companies to go after them.
its definitely a bit of a gateway for anyone wanting to commit a terrorist attack but they can just find workarounds. soo many fucked up things hide in plain sight on the internet. even on social media but there is just too much money tied up with advertising and companies to go after them.
SofaKingSick
Active member
14049856:theLiquor said:
that's not what censorship is. private organizations that fund websites are under no obligation to host your "edgy, rarely racist" shit or any of the other more serious wacko stuff this thread is about
the people in this thread are hilarious trying to make these sewer rats sound like victims. they are all perfectly free to have their own websites and they can talk about whatever they want, but no one has to host them
Youngm_IPCME
Active member
14050338:SofaKingSick said:
People love the invisible hand till it slaps them across the face.
Bateman
Active member
14049934:skierman said:
havent been on in forever but good to see you're still on room temp levels of IQ
How is it a good idea to force these 'neo nazis / white supremacists / mass shoters' and whatever, underground? Wouldn't it be more beneficial to keep 8chan up and monitor it, instead of shutting it off and forcing them underground?
Do you think this in any way makes anything safer?
but I wouldn't expect some inbread white trash like yourself to be able to think a string of thoughts that exceeds the twitter 300 character limit
skierman
Active member
14051179:Evola said:
YEAH MAN, LET'S MAKE IT EASIER FOR THEM TO GATHER AND SHARE THEIR MANIFESTOS BEFORE COMMITTING MASS MURDERS BECAUSE LIKE FORCING THEM UNDERGROUND AND SHAMING THEM DOESN'T DO NUTHING! DATS WHY THE KKK STILL HAS MILLIONS OF MEMBERS BEFORE THEY WERE SHAMED AND FORCED UNDERGROUND. AS WE ALL KNOW, ALLOWING THEM EASY ACCESS TO PUBLIC SHARING OF IDEAS EASILY ALLOWED HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE FBI TO KEEP AN EYE ON THEM WHICH IS WHY MULTIPLE MASS SHOOTINGS RELATED TO THE PUBLIC FORUMZ WERE NOT PREVENTED IN THE PAST FEW YEARS. LIKE TOTALLY WORKING, WE SHULD KEEP DOING IT!!! IF ONLY TRUMP DIDN'T ORDER HOMELAND SECURITIES TO SHIFT THEIR FOCUS AWAY FROM WHITE SUPREMACIST GROUPS! LIKE MAYBEEEEZ
ChadThundercock
Active member
I didn't read your post, therefore you made no points
Chunderface
Active member
"I DIDN'T READ YOUR POST, THEREFOR YOU MADE NO POINTS" - Evola
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
ALL BUNCH AND NO PLAY MAKES SKIERMAN A DULL BOY
davetron78
Member
has anyone researched the 'great awakening map'? it encapsulates, events, conspiratorial evidence that everything we think we know is false
[url=https://www.greatawakeningmap.co/]https://www.greatawakeningmap.co[/URL]
[url=https://www.greatawakeningmap.co/]https://www.greatawakeningmap.co[/URL]
WoFIowz
Active member
14049981:Tnski said:
Correct. It was no censorship but rather mutual decision.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/04/technology/8chan-shooting-manifesto.html
WoFIowz
Active member
And seriously though are some of you actually butt hurt that this site got taken down??? Sure there's others but this one was most popular with a bunch of psychos.
Why do you care if it stays up or not? What purpose did you have on it in the first place or recently? Personally I've never even heard of the site until this year. What was the common content anyway?
If you still wanna chat in your nazi fan clubs, learn to use tor or gtfo.
Why do you care if it stays up or not? What purpose did you have on it in the first place or recently? Personally I've never even heard of the site until this year. What was the common content anyway?
If you still wanna chat in your nazi fan clubs, learn to use tor or gtfo.
Youngm_IPCME
Active member
14052601:.frenchy said:
No, private businesses are not beholden to the constitution. Any hosting service has terms that allow them to terminate service at any tome for any reason. Amazing how the pro-business crowd is also the “but why isn’t my shitty behavior tolerated by PR departments?” crowd.
14052601:.frenchy said:
I may be mistaken and I'm to lazy to actually research it but I believe the hosting service took it dow. Adding to the big argument around whether or not large private companies like google, facebook, or twitter should be able to control what people see
T.L.
Active member
14052622:Young_IPMC said:
Incorrect. Don't act like a know-it-all unless you actually know what you're talking about. You need to read up on the distinction between a PLATFORM and a PUBLISHER.
In 1994, in the Turner Broadcasting v. FEC case the Supreme Court said it “does not disable the government from taking steps to ensure that private interests not restrict . . . the free flow of information and ideas.”.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5334675097720961353
Also..
Under section 230 of the CDA, PLATFORMS were given immunity against any dangerous fuckery that their users post on their sites. The consequences of things like libel law fall onto the USER on a platform. This is a protection that true PUBLISHERS (content curators) take advantage of because the laws on the books are never applied as written due to big-tech lobbying.
https://www.minclaw.com/legal-resource-center/what-is-section-230-of-the-communication-decency-act-cda/
For example: NS is a publisher. Without a doubt. But, if NS ever went to court over things that were posted on here, I'd bet you $100 they would claim themselves as a platform so that that they're released of all liabilities of what was posted. Shit.. a forum this old most certainly has which is why they insist on active moderators and admins... so they can curate the content.
If you don't understand the absolutely massive implications of what is going on right now with the internet, you better wake the fuck up or you might as well start burning books. If you are on the side of ANY platform censorship whatsoever, you are on the wrong side. The world is not a nice place..people are evil.. we get it, but, if we continue to censor what can be discussed on TRUE platforms, you're really not going to like the world we're going to be living in soon. Bank on it.
Amazing how the pro-fascism crowd here don't just come out and say it: "I'm a fascist and I'd like to control how people think and speak because someones feelings are probably hurt somewhere.".
You bootleg-woke idiots better shape up. It's very unbecoming to be such a dumb smart person.
WoFIowz
Active member
Anyone who says it's censorship is wrong. See the link I posted earlier in the thread. It was a mutual decision by the founder and current operating owners of the site to take it down. End of story.
Additionally as someone already said, it's a private company who owns a site, and they can keep it up or take it down for whatever fucking reason they want to. Whether it's politically or morally based or both, it doesn't matter.
If Microsoft suddenly said fuck it, gamers blow, they could shut down xbox live and ain't shit anyone could do about it. But they wouldn't because they would lose so much money. Same goes for YouTube and Facebook where so much filth, propaganda, and extremism exists and transmits through. 8chan shut down probably isn't costing much to the owner, and shit the positive PR might even help them. It's probably a bigger risk to keep it active.
End this discussion on the censorship aspect of it because it's not true. I'm right. You're wrong. End of story.
Additionally as someone already said, it's a private company who owns a site, and they can keep it up or take it down for whatever fucking reason they want to. Whether it's politically or morally based or both, it doesn't matter.
If Microsoft suddenly said fuck it, gamers blow, they could shut down xbox live and ain't shit anyone could do about it. But they wouldn't because they would lose so much money. Same goes for YouTube and Facebook where so much filth, propaganda, and extremism exists and transmits through. 8chan shut down probably isn't costing much to the owner, and shit the positive PR might even help them. It's probably a bigger risk to keep it active.
End this discussion on the censorship aspect of it because it's not true. I'm right. You're wrong. End of story.
WoFIowz
Active member
14052650:.frenchy said:
BUT they weren't you moron so what's the point of arguing hypotheticals with skierman all night, that will eventually morph into a debate about politics and further into gun control and finally into how he hates trump and you suck trumps dick?
…………………./´¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’…../
……….”…\………. _.·´
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\…
T.L.
Active member
14052650:.frenchy said:
They weren't. Board owner has kept the site down until he sits down with members of Congress. Which he's not even obligated to do but since there's unilateral support from compromised members of our government to squash free speech he's volunteered to keep it down so they can't blame more shootings on free speech.
..even though elpaso guy uploaded his fake manifesto to Instagram first. Weird how Instagram isn't being brought into this isn't it ??? chin scratching intensifies
Internet cool kid up here with his edgy middle finger display is mostly correct but he's still childish as you can see.
Not sure how the convo switch to 'private businesses can do what they want' but that doesn't apply to media platforms was my point above.
WoFIowz
Active member
14052713:T.L. said:
Internet cool kid here. Yeah social media like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube are filled with all sorts of filth including propaganda and extremism. The thing is though, the government will never be able to moderate or shut them down as it would make people angry, and affect the economy as well since these are multi billion dollar companies with their fingers in everything. It blows my mind the kind of shit that's on youtube these days (even kid YouTube is fucked) and the dangerously fake information on Facebook (excluding politics). All that's really gonna happen is some empty promises to try harder and some fines handed down.
Youngm_IPCME
Active member
14052637:T.L. said:
I think you misread. Turner only talks about government statues requiring specific messages to be broadcast. A hosting service is not the government. If I hosted a site, and my terms said “no obscene content” then I could reasonably take down any site that violated those terms.
Additionally, section 230 of the CDA exempts the government from pursuing action against the platform. Again, a website host is not the government, so this does bot apply.
Please try again.
Youngm_IPCME
Active member
14052627:Lonely said:
I’d have to agree, but I’m just trying to point out that what you mentioned is more or less half of the goal of the republican party. People who support that have no right to complain when it doesn’t go their way.