4FRNT STL 167 vs Bluehouse MR 171

[Drew-Z]

i'm a fairly advanced all mountain skier but just getting into park so i figured now would be a good time to upgrade my skis to a nice pair of twin tips. i want something thats good all mountain and kinda have my selection down to 4FRNT STLs or MRs. i was wondering, which skis do you think would be most appropriate for me? are the bluehouses worth the extra $$? what are the pros and cons of both?

 

[Drew-Z]

anyone?

 

[4frnt_4_life]

4frnt stl's are really good for all mountain and i like the graphics better but that just me. i have never talked to anyone riding bluehouse skis so i cant speak on how good they are but the 4frnt's are a safer choice more people i know have used them and liked them.

 

[sykonaut]

BH MR, I've heard it's a sick ski.

I think the topsheet is fucking mad looking too. Sooo original.

 

[MaxWebb]

BLUEHOUSES are soooo sick. I rode districts last year and now i have a prototype pair of MR's from a photo contest and my cousin rides the MR's and we both thing they are sick. Deffinetly a good buy

 

[Balto]

get the BHs and buy no_steeze's, hes selling new 171s for 240

 

[Drew-Z]

aahhh, yea id love to have gotten no_steeze's but when i PMed him he said theyve been sold already. really missed out there due to a lack of thead-awareness. im on the lookout from now on...

 

[ladecker]

Bluehouse

 

[Drew-Z]

do you guys think the MRs will hold up well on rails and boxes/table tops?

 

[Drew-Z]

sorry to bump this again, but i think now im considering addict pros, ar6s, or MRs

thoughts on which would suit me best?

 

[C.R.E.A.M]

yea those bh's are soo soo soo soo sick topsheet is dialed in too, great ski.