4frnt or dynastar

down-kink-down

down-kink-down

Member
I am going to get a new pair of skis.

I am considering dynastar trouble makers and the 4frnt STL.

which ski would be the better ski.

 
boht skis are really sick, the TM is super soft for butters and a ton of presses. the stls are soft in the tip and tail so u can still do butters and be able to ski them on hard pack, the stls a dope cant go wrong with them

pray for snow
 
4FRNT

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

'Nobody spends more time on his knees than George W. Bush.' - Shaggy

If you ski in Massachusetts join the Mass-ive Cult, message me and you're in!!!!

THE WORST PART ABOUT BEING ATLANTASKI IS BEING A IGNORANT RED-NECK

'... Osama Bin Laden then closed the video with this statemeant 'I'M RICK JAMES, BITCH!!!' which show us all he does is sit around and watch TV' - John Stewart
 
ask around, EVERYONE who was on tms last year is on stls. they are way sick. durrable, mountains of pop (and it last unlike the tm) and they are alot lighter.

i looked on google but all i could find was 3D Animation porn-sxmarty6

ECS headwear, hit me up!
 
dynastar

________________________________________

[And if someday I find my peace of mind]

[I will share my wealth with all of human kind]
 
ok everyone, let's get our act together.

tms are an amazing ski. more pop than anything else (that i've skied, anyway {which include stls}), and an awesome ski on groomers. they are a bit heavier than other skis, but that is not really an issue. as for durability? i have one crack. that is all, the rest is comestic. of course we have all heard the horror stories, but don't kid yourself, these are an awe ski.

4frnt stl are also a very nice ski. quite poppy (although i still believe that tms have got them when it comes to pop), and a smooth riding ski. these are lighter than tms, if that is an issue for you. i'm not so sure about durability, but i have already seen some nasty things from 4frnts (see mikees post).

all i'm asking is you do not say: ''trouble makers fall apert, 4frnt is badass because they are''

.CCR.

impact
 
We have all seen much worse pictures of the Trouble makers than of the 4frnts. If you remember a year ago at this time everyones tm's were falling apart, and they were pasting them all over this website. way more than the two people that have had problems with their 4's.

 
tons of people on this site have switched from dynastar to 4frnt

___________________________________________________


k2 05 06
 
I have both tm's and 4frnts and theyre both sick. But I'd say go with 4frnt and support a dope company

*Welcome to the dub ski radio show*

 
I was on dynastars last eya rand I am still on dynastars. I wonder how many people saying boo dynastar have actually ridden them or have just gone with the flow of the site. Don't be idiots and think for yourself.

Like a virgin on prom night

A few soft moans

You can go on the bottom bunk and finish it yourself

When you guys are on those rails, it's like muah

You A-hole
 
yeah, i was on tms last year, and am on 4frnts right now. how can you say the tms have more pop? maybe out of a pipe, but that snappiness only last a few weeks. and they were way to damp to ollie. i couldnt get those fuckers more than 6 inches off the ground. on line 1260s and my stls, i can easily get 1-2 ft off the ground. and unlike the tms, which were noodles halfway throught the season, my 4frnts still feel new. plus, the tm is really nose heavy, and they were a bitch on rails. they are sick skis for jumping and pipe, but unless thats all you plan on doing, the 4frnts are a WAY, WAY, better ski, in pretty much all aspects.

i looked on google but all i could find was 3D Animation porn-sxmarty6

ECS headwear, hit me up!
 
i agree that dynastars have good pop, but i have had concepts and have borrowed TMs from a friend and can tell you one thing, the edges do not hold up, I borrowed the TMs after a foot of edge fell out, i came back a week later with thre new cracks in his skis.

My other friend has lines and has not had any problems, they make quality skis.

 
it depends what you ski mostly, if your a park kinda guy then 4frnt is deffinatley the way to go however if u are one that shreds the pow dynastar is the route you'll want to take.

-Keegan McGinnis.

-newschoolers.com.

-ski for life.

-nwft.
 
How is dynastar the ski you would want for pow? The TM has about a 78 waist. All the 4frnts are fatter. The new big trouble is only a 92 waist, and they finally are coming out with it next season. If anything, Dynastar is the last company you want a pow ski from.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top