450 disasters or 450 ons?

wolf07

Member
alrite me my friend were having an argument the other day over which is harder, a 450 disaster onto a dfd rail, or a 450 onto a down rail, for those would said the kink rail, i agree. what do you guys think?
 
you read ma mind except that it depends how big the dfd rail is cuz even if you can spin slower it might be hard to nicely land on it.
 
strait 450 on to a DFD would be much harder than disaster...i think disaster would take more balls to try thoe
 
would they not be the same?

youre doing the same trick onto a down section of a rail...

450 disaster to flat would be harder, and really awesome, I would bow down ala westside connection.
 
depends on how it is looking in your head... if the rails are relatively the same length (and since i cant 450 on) i 270 the same speed. Or would anyways. as in id go farther down the down rail... NAH MEAN?
 
the disaster would be easier if you really hucked and cleared the kink, but it depends on what harder for the skier, clearing it or 450s
 
when u clear a section off the rail/box, to hit the other part of it, u will usually land on a down part
 
i can 450 disaster but cant really do it onto a flat rail. and i have never tried to a down rail cuz i guarantee i would slip out backwords.

in a disaster, you don't need to lock onto the rail; it's basically just a 5 with a little tap in there.

a 450 onto a down rail you need to lock on, be balanced, and keep your weight forward=much harder
 
it'd be the same just need to go faster for one. but i'm coming to afton soon that'd a dope dfd. i'll come 450 disaster it with ya.
 
Back
Top