Chunderface
Active member
14380882:Coleg55 said:
Where do you ski?
2021/2022 On3p
- Thread starter 9try
- Start date
Where do you ski?
xonskier78
Member
14380801:Paul. said:
Im lazy can you summarize the podcast?
steep
Active member
Convinced myself I need a pair of Jeffrey 118s. Sold out on the site - seems like they only way to get a pair is custom - does anyone have an idea of lead times (or where the heck I might be able to find a pair for sale)? I know with supply chain issues, covid in general, etc. lead times are probably going to be long and also hard to predict.
Site currently says mid-February, however I leave for a 10 day trip on Feb 12 so about hesitant to pull the trigger on something I might get a couple of days out of until next year. Can anyone possibly provide a timeline if you recently ordered customs?
(Or if for whatever reason someone has an unmounted pair of J118s to sell, ha!)
thanks all
Site currently says mid-February, however I leave for a 10 day trip on Feb 12 so about hesitant to pull the trigger on something I might get a couple of days out of until next year. Can anyone possibly provide a timeline if you recently ordered customs?
(Or if for whatever reason someone has an unmounted pair of J118s to sell, ha!)
thanks all
GayWolf420
Active member
I feel like I made a mistake throwing kingpins on my Woodsman 108s because Ive barely touched them, but I also swapped a pair of STH2 16s onto a pair of Ravens that I might honestly swap my kingpins to and take those/put those on the 108s and finally let them puppies breath.
ReturnToMonkey
Active member
14381999:DeebieSkeebies said:
The way I see it, pin bindings should never go on on3ps. The typical skier riding on3ps is way too aggressive and dynamic for pins and they simply hold the ski back a lot
GayWolf420
Active member
14382040:ReturnToMonkey said:
I wouldn't mind the tour woodsman but yeah, I do kind-of agree. I also was able to get my Ravens fully base-repaired and waxed up, its a 185cm ski so my BD skins will still work, and I think that ski is meant to have a pin binding on it too, but it'll be mount number 3, but I don't plan on ripping that thing hard at all
14382040:ReturnToMonkey said:
Lol I had kingpins on my Woodsman 108’s last year and when I brake checked a tree, the bindings held while the ski did this. Pin bindings are fine, stop being a pussy and send it.
ReturnToMonkey
Active member
14382360:RudyGarmisch said:
Interesting. The other thing about pin bindings is when ice builds up it sucks. But so do other hybrid bindings. Ice just sucks in general
xonskier78
Member
Anyone knows when/if Jessies 96 gonna be stocked?
14388645:xonskier78 said:
Anything under 100 underfoot is basically built to order, so if you want one order one.
Chunderface
Active member
14389062:RudyGarmisch said:
what about jeff 102?
xonskier78
Member
14389062:RudyGarmisch said:
Nah I cant afford it. I mean 750$ for a pair of skis is much but pay plus 300$ just because its custom and just because it isnt stock i mean its ridiculous…
xonskier78
Member
14389457:Session said:
No if I buy j96 on stock its 749 and custom starts by 899 plus park detune 50 makes 949$. So its 200$ for the exact same ski. I mean wtff?!!
14389465:xonskier78 said:
Jeffrey 96 don’t come with a park tune out of stock. It’s $150 more, and for that you get to choose your bases, sidewalls and topsheet. Find any other company offering custom options for that little over stock MSRP.
Also - check evo maybe?
whatsamonad
Member
14390358:RudyGarmisch said:
Bro the customs are worth the small price just for the sick top sheets and bases you can get
xonskier78
Member
14390771:whatsamonad said:
yeah but you pay an extra 100 bucks for bases and another 100 for the special tops... If I order jessie 96 in stock its 749$ and if i order the exact same ski but on custom I pay 899$ so its plus 150$ just for custom...
xonskier78
Member
anybody knows when the new skis drop? its late february....
Chunderface
Active member
14401359:xonskier78 said:
What new skis
ReturnToMonkey
Active member
14401425:Chunder_Khat said:
Mangos. You have been able to get them custom for months now, I bit the bullet and got a pair. I love em!
xonskier78
Member
14401428:ReturnToMonkey said:
yeah but not on stock
ReturnToMonkey
Active member
14401432:xonskier78 said:yeah but not on stock
Ye they're probably still so backed up with custom orders but that's just speculation. I did see this, I know it doesnt help but it's pretty cool
https://shop.on3pskis.com/products/mango-trees
GayWolf420
Active member
14382360:RudyGarmisch said:
I'm bumping this thread again specifically to talk about how rad the woodsman 108s are with kingpins. I finally took mine out today at snowbird with all sorts of spring conditions like freeze/thaw, ice, slush, etc., and had an absolute time. Great skis, and you are absolutely right. I'm going to keep them as is and just work on my boots. Super fun skis. Thank you ON3P.
Colingarnes
Member
Bumping this thread since my soft Jeffrey 110’s came today to go along with my Kartel 98’s.
Stoked is an understatement. Mounting em up with Attack 14’s again and taking them up to Mammoth next week.
Stoked is an understatement. Mounting em up with Attack 14’s again and taking them up to Mammoth next week.
Colingarnes
Member
14428025:Session said:
Mine came pretty quick.. wanna say 2 1/2 weeks. Hand flexing these 110's versus my stock stiffness 98's has me pretty excited for some butters and pow skiing.
CatdickBojangles
Active member
14428038:Colingarnes said:
Gotta let us know how the soft flex is.
Colingarnes
Member
14428051:CatdickBojangles said:
Definitely. Was pretty set on line sir Francis bacons then was like why not just soften up another pair of wider Kartels?
CatdickBojangles
Active member
14428069:Colingarnes said:
I’ve got Jeffrey 98s and 108s I’ve wanted a pair of bacons for awhile just for that turn radius ripped straight from the Sakana. But I’ve been considering replacing the 108s with a custom soft 102 or 110.
xonskier78
Member
Yesterday, I checked and it said 4.20.22. Well we are already used to wait on ONEP
DrZoidberg
Active member
14428073:CatdickBojangles said:
I have and enjoy my bacons and this is sort of what's kept me off some of the on3ps. The turn radius is just so good on the bacons. I really want to try some of the Seasons. I'm a east coast boy, so I'm super into having like a 16m turn radius. But considering where they're from and what the skis are made for, I get why Jeffs aren't super tight sidecut. When I go out west it's like wow, you actually have the room to use a turn radius that isn't like 16m.
xonskier78
Member
Wow another delay thanks ONEP....
CatdickBojangles
Active member
14431311:xonskier78 said:
You aren’t even going to buy them
No.Quarter
Active member
Once again I am trying to decide if I should pull the trigger on another pair of OHNEPS.
Currently ski the 2019 Wrenegade 114 in a 184cm, and Jeffrey 114 in a 181cm. Wrens are alpine only, Jeffs are mounted with inserts for both alpine and tele, and whatever width of Woodsman I buy would be also get inserts for alpine and tele. Despite being a very directional skier I deeply adore my Jeffries, they are the main squeeze, and still thoroughly enjoy the Wren when I'm feeling like I want to charge.
I can't decide between the Woodsman 96, 102, and 108. Seems like mostly everyone is trending towards skis in the 106-110mm range as daily drivers at Bridger these days (whereas the trend 5 years ago seemed to be everyone on 112mm+ underfoot every day), I still intend to ski my Jeffs and Wrens when we get snow, but it's been a struggle when 95% of my ski days are in the hardpack to absolute shitfuck range, so I want something narrower. How do I decide between the 96 and 102, or do I just get the 108 and get rid of my Jeffs and Wrens and join the one ski quiver club.
Currently ski the 2019 Wrenegade 114 in a 184cm, and Jeffrey 114 in a 181cm. Wrens are alpine only, Jeffs are mounted with inserts for both alpine and tele, and whatever width of Woodsman I buy would be also get inserts for alpine and tele. Despite being a very directional skier I deeply adore my Jeffries, they are the main squeeze, and still thoroughly enjoy the Wren when I'm feeling like I want to charge.
I can't decide between the Woodsman 96, 102, and 108. Seems like mostly everyone is trending towards skis in the 106-110mm range as daily drivers at Bridger these days (whereas the trend 5 years ago seemed to be everyone on 112mm+ underfoot every day), I still intend to ski my Jeffs and Wrens when we get snow, but it's been a struggle when 95% of my ski days are in the hardpack to absolute shitfuck range, so I want something narrower. How do I decide between the 96 and 102, or do I just get the 108 and get rid of my Jeffs and Wrens and join the one ski quiver club.
ReturnToMonkey
Active member
14431382:No.Quarter said:
Get the 96 or 102, depending on how much your knees hurt. Go 102 if no pain ever, 96 if you occasionally feel pain. Or get Jeff 100s and Woodsman 108, sell the Jeff 114s to me on a lend-lease deal
No.Quarter
Active member
14431479:ReturnToMonkey said:Get the 96 or 102, depending on how much your knees hurt. Go 102 if no pain ever, 96 if you occasionally feel pain. Or get Jeff 100s and Woodsman 108, sell the Jeff 114s to me on a lend-lease deal
Lol I think you would be much better suited getting yourself a new pair rather than me selling you a pair of 10 year old skis with a shitload of screw holes in them and trashed topsheets. I plan on skiing those until they are unskiable anyway, which should hopefully be another 10 seasons. But hey, if you wanna give 'em a rip for a day at Bridger sometime and have a BSL somewhere close to 315mm hit me up.
14431382:No.Quarter said:
I'd get on the 96 for pure shitfuck conditions. I've been on the wide trend historically and have narrowed it down - daresay I actually enjoy skiing on shitty days a lot more now.
Dont sell the Wrens and Jeffs if you still like em. I tried to retire a set of Wren 108's and took em down from the wall and remounted them - still too much fun.
GayWolf420
Active member
Piggybacking that post as well. I ride Kartel108s, Was riding my woodsman 116s daily but tore out a binding, have been on my Woodsman 108s w/ kingpins recently and also trying to pull the trigger on some new skis but can't decide what. Woody 110s or a Jeffery 116? The 108s have been unreal so far with the spring storms in Utah. Had some of the best turns ever on them. The 110 looks nice
**This post was edited on Apr 28th 2022 at 8:39:57pm
**This post was edited on Apr 28th 2022 at 8:39:57pm
xonskier78
Member
14431338:CatdickBojangles said:
Why not?
No.Quarter
Active member
14431934:RudyGarmisch said:
How are the 96's gonna handle in fresh snow, do all widths share the same rocker profile or do the 96's have more effective edge? We have been having a lot of weird weather cycles that end up with pow on ice, and that end's up with doing a lot of pocket hunting trying to find areas of enough wind deposited snow that gets you above the ice, but still requires a lot of edge hold on ice when you are searching for those zones, so the Jeffs and Wrens can be a bit unruly on the ice but the extra float is welcome when I find those pockets. I do love skiing bumps and the narrower choice seems to make sense there too, but I'd also have to go custom to get the 96 (not that I haven't been considering customs anyway) and would be more expensive.
TBH the main reason I want another pair of ON3P's is durability, but I'm also considering the 4FRNT MSP 99 and Moment Commander 98, and Wildcat 101 to be my low tide ski. Blister seemed to love how versatile and agreeable the MSP 99 was and I've always been interested in Moment's offerings, but my biggest consideration when buying a ski is durability so It's hard to stray from ON3P since they have really proven themselves with the abuse I've dished out to my Jeffs and Wrens, but I am also craving some variety and the Woodsman is just a variation of skis that I already know (but love to ski)
muffMan.
Active member
14431382:No.Quarter said:
Just my experience but the jeffereys 102 are a perfect daily driver at bridger.
I used those most days and then some reckoner 112s for anything deeper but tbh that extra width only helped just a bit. Any stashes along the ridge and high T I could still ski through and charged right through the choppy stuff.
I remember taking the 102s to targhee after that crazy 40”-50” storm cycle they had, and Still had crazy float around the right side of the mountain.