I don't disagree with either of your logic. Tanner doesn't ski park much now and you're right his work in ski development would probably be better put towards a powder ski, since that's what he skis. I've never disagreed with that point. I just don't believe that building the best possible skis is the number one priority.
Armada like most (all?) ski companies is in it to make the most money possible, as they've displayed clearly with their recent legal case. So I'd imagine, like I've said, having Tanner's name on a park ski is most profitable situation for both Armada and for Tanner.
ya know, it seems like every time i see a pep edit, he's on hellbents. i kinda wonder why k2 continues to make a pep pro model ski, when the pro himself rarely uses it? idk, maybe he does, but i dont see it.
its not 40k, lesh said 20k in the video, there is no way they could afford to sell 40k suits for the current price, and doubling the price of something is a great way to lose customers
I'd buy them. They are about the same price as I/O's and those are fucking great goggles. The interchangable system like this is what most optic companies should start doing.
I know it's not 40K i'mnot dubm, it's just the first time i listened to it it really did sound like it and I was wondering if I was the only to whom it happened..
From left to right: Super 7 (Now in a 188 as well as a 195), S7, S3, Sickle (S6), Scimitar (S5 with full U rocker), Kev/Xav Pro (S4), Scratch (S4), Storm and Sprayer (both women's models).
Does anyone know how much stiffer the super 7 with the titinal sheets will be than the s7? Im 6'7 and 220lbs looking to pick up one of next seasons skis, volkl katana 198 is an option but super 7 looks super fun, just wondering if itll be stiff and stable enough?? I like to ski fast and straight, and like something solid and stable!
thanks!