2010 CoreUPT Candide Pow Review

atomic1824

Member
2010 Candide Pow 186cm Review:
My first impression was that the box they came in was really light. Almost too light. The skis out of the box maintained my impression. Top sheet are fucking awesome looking.
Back to my order, I ordered right through the web, and got them in 5days. I never received the tracking number I'd been told I'd receive later after my order confirmation. After a few days I started to get worried, but then came home from the Mountain and they were waiting on my porch. The package looked like these skis came from a warehouse in Canada. The skis cost was true to what the Website said. So I was stoked, they came quickly with no surprise shipping or import duties.
They're made in China which I am not thrilled about having skied a heritage of well manufactured European skis, but I understand there are lots of great skis made in China, just none I've skied. :) They feel like they are a blended core of fiberglass and wood, but with no metal. The mounting point was not readily apparent but there was a small gold arrow 4cm back from true center that seemed to be the recommended location and was were I got them mounted. The most forward mounting position of all the skis I've owned. My last impression was that they flexed well for a light ski (not a Dyna XXL stiff) but they had a reasonably stiff tip and a nice even flex through under foot to a slightly softer tail. I got them mounted with a 2007 Scratch 140 binding that adds some weight but is a really trusted binder.
How they ski: I've skied them for days straight in a row and I love them. Super playful and with a great flex. They'll butter pow piles really well with a soft flex right under the toe pieces. The first day I skied only a dusting (0-3") of new snow. I started with some groomers where they railed a steady wide turn both forward and switch and buttered great. Off the little trail side jumps they had good pop and spun quick. I am a VT skier and took em through the tracked out bob-sled run trees where they edged and turned very well.
Day 2: I got to ski some great 10-12" windblown upslope effect powder at the Bush where I truly loved them. The tip floats sick(esp for non rocker, although compared to my other boards I've wondered if it could be unofficially called early rise) and the soft tail flexes well despite the more center mount. I am a very strong skier with a GS background and I pushed em hard in the pow filled trees and they really handled it. I was taken back, based on my understanding that they don't have a metal top sheet, the low price, and chinese construction, but somehow it went against my beliefs and skied pow hard and fast like a champ.
I probably won't use them for rails in interest of keeping em around for awhile, but I am really psyched to get on some park jumps out east and some natural features in SLC later this year, because I can tell they will really shine under those conditions. I've gotten to take some little VT style rock drops and they seem strong enough. I'll probably bring my XXLs for out west trips and the tracked and packed days, but for playful all mountain days, tree skiing, BC jumps, VT trees, park jumps and spring corn this will be my ski.
I would say go buy CoreUPT skis with confidence because they seem to be making some great products. I'll update my reivew with information about durability as I ski them more.
Ha took an opportunity to brag about my quiver.
1266707910myspreadNS.JPG

 
I rode the Rossi Steeze (S6 now) a bunch when they first came out which is notably wider then these Pows but they've been floating comparably. I think the softer tail helps get up on a plane so quickly. I am not sure if they are considered an "early rise" shape but these Candide pows look like the tip rise starts earlier then I am used to. I don't want to spread false information, I am just calling it how I see it.
PS. I got another day of riding windblown in pow filled trees here in VT and I am STILL really loving these skis. Can't wait for my Utah trip in a couple of weeks to get to open up a little bit more in deep snow (cross my fingers). One note is the top sheet seems a little week it has been taking some gouges in it pretty quickly.
 
Feb 11th. Yeah, I've sent a few emails to the contact information and never heard a word, I also messaged the NS CoreUPT member and never heard anything. But my skis came right on time and they're sweet. Hopefully they hold up!
 
^^ Thanks! That made my day. I love bragging about my quiver. I love it.

^ In the Park: I am not going to use them for rails, but they are really light even with my scratch 140 binder, but I've been hitting jumps with them and they've been great. Spin quick, and I don't wheelie out on landings. (But, I don't land in the back seat anyway) They've got a good flex for landing switch too. I think they'd be a pretty good park ski, if you're not into doing the smoothest of butters, they'd be perfect.
 
Bump! Yep. I am bumping my own thread. Candide one the FWT and this thread should be right back at the top.
So I've skied my POWs for a few more weeks and they absolutely rip. I got some great snow in Utah and I loved them. They floated great and really fun and easy to ski.
Floating just fine!
1269275667814180249_SarJZ-O.jpg


And air it out pretty well too!
1269275439814193803_8vLCN-O.jpg

 
Ha ha ha. Not intentionally, the top sheet doesn't show the hand. I have all my fingers too. But that is pretty funny. Thanks
 
hi, before i get into my quesiton ill just say, im from australia and most of our snow is icy in the morning and slush/crud in the afternoon.

so im just wondering how these ski on steeper icy/slushy terrain..probably comparable to your early/late season skiing.

cheers!
 
Just got these skis, they look sweeeeeeet! Have the 2010/2011 model 175 and now have a pair of dukes to put on them, was just wodering if anyone had suggestions where to mount them? I know the suggested mounting point is on the gold triangle but just wanted to know where people wre mounting them?
 
I mounted them with jesters just one inch above the golden triangle (I wanted them a bit closer to the center) and really like how they ski this way. Hope this helps.
1298573250IMGP0651.jpg

 
They are now mounted dead center. The angle of the pic makes it look worse than they really were. (coreupt sent them to me mounted this way, so I simply had them redrilled dead center)
 
Just PMed you about it.
But they are really fun all around the mountain and they also float really well in the pow pow. I love them, it's the best BC ski I ever had (and the price is awesome too)!
 
So your saying they handle well in the pow being mounted so close to center? Ive always had my skis mounted further back for the pow. I tested the ski last season and they were mounted on the triangle, they felt good all round but felt a bit tip heavy but the snow was heavy and wet and not that nice.
 
Yeah, they do feel nice mounted this way. They are not that close to dead center... Personally, I don't feel the need to mount my pow skis far back because I still got some legs to work with and I don't have any trouble controlling them. Some people prefer to have them mounted farther back or else they have trouble riding them (not saying this is your case).
 
Yeah I know what your saying, i do have legs! Skiing since the age of 4 combined with about 15 years of rugby have given me some decent tree trunks. Ive just always beennervous about going further and further forward with my skis, dont want to find that the tips always want to take a dive under the snow whenever they get a chance! I know the arrow is where Tovex has suggested but as we all know he is just a little bit better than,well..... everyone!
 
Back
Top