2000 People Feared Dead in an Attack by Boko Haram

BravoWhiskey5280

Active member
-COPY-


[URL]http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/01/09/boko-haram-nigeria-massacre/21524009/


YOLA, Nigeria (AP) — Hundreds of bodies — too many to count — remain strewn in the bush in Nigeria from an Islamic extremist attack that Amnesty International suggested Friday is the "deadliest massacre" in the history of Boko Hara[/url]m.

Mike Omeri, the government spokesman on the insurgency, said fighting continued Friday for Baga, a town on the border with Chad where insurgents seized a key military base on Jan. 3 and attacked again on Wednesday.

"Security forces have responded rapidly, and have deployed significant military assets and conducted airstrikes against militant targets," Omeri said in a statement.

District head Baba Abba Hassan said most victims are children, women and elderly people who could not run fast enough when insurgents drove into Baga, firing rocket-propelled grenades and assault rifles on town residents.

"The human carnage perpetrated by Boko Haram terrorists in Baga was enormous," Muhammad Abba Gava, a spokesman for poorly armed civilians in a defense group that fights Boko Haram, told The Associated Press.

He said the civilian fighters gave up on trying to count all the bodies. "No one could attend to the corpses and even the seriously injured ones who may have died by now," Gava said.

An Amnesty International statement said there are reports the town was razed and as many as 2,000 people killed.

If true, "this marks a disturbing and bloody escalation of Boko Haram's ongoing onslaught," said Daniel Eyre, Nigeria researcher for Amnesty International.

The previous bloodiest day in the uprising involved soldiers gunning down unarmed detainees freed in a March 14, 2014, attack on Giwa military barracks in Maiduguri city. Amnesty said then that satellite imagery indicated more than 600 people were killed that day.

The 5-year insurgency killed more than 10,000 people last year alone, according to the Washington-based Council on Foreign Relations. More than a million people are displaced inside Nigeria and hundreds of thousands have fled across its borders into Chad, Cameroon and Nigeria.

Emergency workers said this week they are having a hard time coping with scores of children separated from their parents in the chaos of Boko Haram's increasingly frequent and deadly attacks.

Just seven children have been reunited with parents in Yola, capital of Adamawa state, where about 140 others have no idea if their families are alive or dead, said Sa'ad Bello, the coordinator of five refugee camps in Yola.

He said he was optimistic that more reunions will come as residents return to towns that the military has retaken from extremists in recent weeks.

Suleiman Dauda, 12, said he ran into the bushes with neighbors when extremists attacked his village, Askira Uba, near Yola last year.

"I saw them kill my father, they slaughtered him like a ram. And up until now I don't know where my mother is," he told The Associated Press at Daware refugee camp in Yola.

Umar reported from Bauchi, Nigeria. Associated Press writer Michelle Faul contributed to this story from Johannesburg.

 
The attack is the second most deadly terrorists attack in modern history behind 9/11. That fact alone warrants a global outcry, yet a large majority of the current media attention and public outrage is centered around the Charlie Hedbo attack. Now don't me wrong, the killings in Paris are a travesty and they deserve a lot of attention. However it's oddly fascinating how the massacring of some 2000 people, mainly women and children, is not the number one story that we're all talking about. It truly is a sad display of the world we live in. How can an attack leaving 12 people dead in a western country gathers more attention and outrage than an attack that pretty much falls under the definition genocide? It'd be one thing if everyone didn't know about these acts of genocide. But we do know that it is happening yet time after time we react in the same way we always have, and thats by ironically not reacting.

We constantly come across a small headline tucked that is usually tucked away at the bottom of our respective news site about how some sort of violence/genocide just happened in some third world African country. The majority of the news goers read the headline, say something in their heads a long the lines of "wow that's terrible", and then they move along to the more important stories (aka the stories that aren't in Africa). If this massacre happened in a country outside of Africa than it would with out a doubt be the number one trending topic on all the social media sites. The whole world would be panicking and on the edge. But nope, this happened in Africa so it's no biggie, it doesn't effect us. Our lack of ambition to resolve conflict in Africa is something I'll ever be able to wrap my mind around. It's fucking 2015 for fucks sake, why the fuck are people out there still acting like this?
 
Holy fuck I butchered that last post lol. My bad, disregard that one. I edited it so you understand what the fuck I was actually saying.

The attack is the second most deadly terrorists attack in modern history behind 9/11. That fact alone warrants a global outcry, yet a large majority of the current media attention and public outrage is centered around the Charlie Hedbo attack. Don't get me wrong, the killings in Paris are a travesty and they deserve a lot of attention. However it's oddly fascinating how the massacring of 2000 people, mainly women and children, isn't the number one thing we're all talking about. It truly is a sad display of the world we live in. How can an attack leaving 12 people dead in a western country gather more attention and outrage than an act of genocide? Time after time we react the same way when we see genocide being committed in Africa and thats by not reacting.

We constantly come across a small headline tucked away at the bottom of a news website about how some sort of violence/genocide that happened in some third world African country. The majority of the news goers read the headline, say something in their heads a long the lines of "wow that's terrible", and then they move along to the more important stories (aka the stories that aren't in Africa). If this massacre happened in a country outside of Africa than it would with out a doubt be the number one trending topic on all the social media sites. The whole world would be panicking and on the edge. But nope, this happened in Africa so it's no biggie, it doesn't effect us. Our lack of ambition to resolve conflict in Africa is something I'll ever be able to wrap my mind around. It's fucking 2015 for fucks sake, why the fuck are people out there still acting like this?
 
13292382:WoldsWorld said:
Our lack of ambition to resolve conflict in Africa is something I'll ever be able to wrap my mind around.

Becaue our oil interest in Africa is minimal compared to the Middle East.
 
13292241:WoldsWorld said:
The attack is the second most deadly terrorists attack in modern history behind 9/11. That fact alone warrants a global outcry, yet a large majority of the current media attention and public outrage is centered around the Charlie Hedbo attack. Now don't me wrong, the killings in Paris are a travesty and they deserve a lot of attention. However it's oddly fascinating how the massacring of some 2000 people, mainly women and children, is not the number one story that we're all talking about. It truly is a sad display of the world we live in. How can an attack leaving 12 people dead in a western country gathers more attention and outrage than an attack that pretty much falls under the definition genocide? It'd be one thing if everyone didn't know about these acts of genocide. But we do know that it is happening yet time after time we react in the same way we always have, and thats by ironically not reacting.

We constantly come across a small headline tucked that is usually tucked away at the bottom of our respective news site about how some sort of violence/genocide just happened in some third world African country. The majority of the news goers read the headline, say something in their heads a long the lines of "wow that's terrible", and then they move along to the more important stories (aka the stories that aren't in Africa). If this massacre happened in a country outside of Africa than it would with out a doubt be the number one trending topic on all the social media sites. The whole world would be panicking and on the edge. But nope, this happened in Africa so it's no biggie, it doesn't effect us. Our lack of ambition to resolve conflict in Africa is something I'll ever be able to wrap my mind around. It's fucking 2015 for fucks sake, why the fuck are people out there still acting like this?

Except the only places that shit like this can happen in are the ones filled with ooga boogas. Most of Africa is hopeless for the time being, no external force is going to fix the problems these countries are having
 
13292241:WoldsWorld said:
The attack is the second most deadly terrorists attack in modern history behind 9/11. That fact alone warrants a global outcry, yet a large majority of the current media attention and public outrage is centered around the Charlie Hedbo attack. Now don't me wrong, the killings in Paris are a travesty and they deserve a lot of attention. However it's oddly fascinating how the massacring of some 2000 people, mainly women and children, is not the number one story that we're all talking about. It truly is a sad display of the world we live in. How can an attack leaving 12 people dead in a western country gathers more attention and outrage than an attack that pretty much falls under the definition genocide? It'd be one thing if everyone didn't know about these acts of genocide. But we do know that it is happening yet time after time we react in the same way we always have, and thats by ironically not reacting.

We constantly come across a small headline tucked that is usually tucked away at the bottom of our respective news site about how some sort of violence/genocide just happened in some third world African country. The majority of the news goers read the headline, say something in their heads a long the lines of "wow that's terrible", and then they move along to the more important stories (aka the stories that aren't in Africa). If this massacre happened in a country outside of Africa than it would with out a doubt be the number one trending topic on all the social media sites. The whole world would be panicking and on the edge. But nope, this happened in Africa so it's no biggie, it doesn't effect us. Our lack of ambition to resolve conflict in Africa is something I'll ever be able to wrap my mind around. It's fucking 2015 for fucks sake, why the fuck are people out there still acting like this?

I mean rwanada in 94 or anything. I guess maybe they weren't islamic extremists.

I hate how we label what does and doesn't matter base on "terrorism". And the way we toss that around. Somebody getting robbed could equal terrorism, it all depends on what the media is feeling.

I mean hell, the US has done plenty of things that could easily be labeled terrorism.

It's just a stupid word at least in what it's become these days. We just throw it around to invoke some sort of post 9/11 reaction out of people. IT works but still.
 
OP you need to come on NS more again. I wanna see some you vs. jen g arguments. That is what i would call entertainment
 
LOL at the kids comparing this to 9/11 or thinking this was a terrorist attack or thinking this is the second worse atrocity to happen second to 9/11.

My god the media has done a fantastic job of turning kids into complete morons with no sense of what's going on in the world around them. Boko Haram has been pulling shit like this for a while and has done equally as bad shit. But don't worry, as long as they're not in the Middle East, they're no threat to us... and by us I mean the oil.
 
13293487:drumbumocdp said:
glad someone said it

i mean, yeah. it makes us seem doushey but we didn't invade kuwait because we had a great relationship with their government. They had oil and Saddam posed a threat to oil being exported here. Once they invaded Kuwait we had a pretty good reason to shoot his ass out of Kuwait and get him out of power in Iraq. The war in Iraq and the war in afghanistan were/are being fought for two different reasons
 
13294291:DeebieSkeebies said:
we love our oils too much to save little black boys and girls.

and not to mention we should just stop sending troops everywhere to places that will probably come to hate us 20 years down the road.
 
13294365:DeebieSkeebies said:
and not to mention we should just stop sending troops everywhere to places that will probably come to hate us 20 years down the road.

Well that's not how the corporations see it and they run the country since they finance all the politicians so... that aint gonna happen. They're not sovereign countries with decades of misunderstood and complex political situations, they're potential customers. Hell, all you gotta do is keep business open long enough to make your investment count, which is very easy to achieve when you're talking about business rights to an entire fucking country.
 
13294651:JenniferGarner said:
Well that's not how the corporations see it and they run the country since they finance all the politicians so... that aint gonna happen. They're not sovereign countries with decades of misunderstood and complex political situations, they're potential customers. Hell, all you gotta do is keep business open long enough to make your investment count, which is very easy to achieve when you're talking about business rights to an entire fucking country.

holy fucking opinions
 
13294291:DeebieSkeebies said:
we love our oils too much to save little black boys and girls.

How does my comment get banned when this shit flies?

This statement is truely offensive AND false.

God damn I didn't know newschoolers was such a pussy footin tart ass website.
 
13294676:KayngBayng said:
holy fucking opinions

Holy fucking truth. All the countries the US invaded and brought "democracy" to, look at what they all have in common... they deregulate government restrictions on companies and allow outside corporations (aka US-based) to come in and completely rape the customer base by either absorbing local businesses or just putting them out of business altogether with low prices of cruddy Chinese made products.

Oh and the energy industry with the oil, that also. And the corporations based on military gear, they're doing quite well also.
 
Back
Top