2 many ski companies?

MARCHILLY

Member
Do you think that there are too many start up ski companies? For such a small market, the market can only become so big. I like the idea behind the, rider owned, rider produced companies, (4frnt, line, etc.)But there are so many now it seems. After 4frnt started it seems like a bunch followed trying to capture the same market. Some body please enlighten me on how these young start up (after 4frnt) companies are goin to make it?

 
I don't think there are too many. It just gives people a chance to ride what they really want to ride and not have to sacrifice any attribute they really want in skis.

open up, we're coming inside. What's it feel like to know you're gonna die?
 
Many companies is a great thing, the more companies the more competition. The more the competition the better the skis and prices we(the consumer) will see. Simple economics.

Keep the fight alive, decriminalize Marijuana!
 
I think we may see one or maybe even two of the less popular companies go bankrupt. Freeskiing is a pretty small market, and when there are too many companies taking pieces from this little pie, someone is bound to get a really small piece.

______________________

Screw this I'm going skiing
 
yes but we should still supprt and encourage them...not bitch them like everyone does liberty

--------------------------------------

rutland ski team for life...

--------------------------------------

 
^ possible, or a larger companie will buyout a smaller company, but keep using their technology.

Keep the fight alive, decriminalize Marijuana!
 
All of these small companies are good for the sport. These core companies give our sport more defenition from lesiure skiing and racing. I can bet that some of these new companies may drop off, but im sure many will stay too.

 
yes but we should still supprt and encourage them...not bitch them like everyone does liberty

--------------------------------------

rutland ski team for life...

--------------------------------------

 
I support who ever makes the best skis, or the skis I'm riding. Not because their a small company and need the help, I think the new ski companies need to prove them selves by lasting a while in the market, that deserves support.

Keep the fight alive, decriminalize Marijuana!
 
I will only buy skis from the 'core' companies, from the niche I will pick the ski that i feel suits my needs and has what I need. Even if there is a larger company (with the exception of K2) that has a better product, I will not buy from them again, or untill a significant change in buisness practices occurs.

 
good, whoever makes bones will be around in the long run

Eat snacky smores, (availible at all Wal-Bogs.)
 
cjspeed16 said it best. more companies=more competition. more competition=less money for us to pay, just look at snowboarding for instance. much more companies than skiing has. now a 'expensive' snowboard is around 300 bucks, and if that were a pair of skis that would be one dank ass deal!

 
the reason the skiz cost so much is they need to profit from their COST. they can't start charging much less until it costs substacially less to make skiz. my piont is just dont the all skiers that will consume all the skiz that are being made by this new front of companies.

 
More companys - more to choose from, more to fit you 'style' | More companys - more sponsors for us :) | More companys - more competition (said my cjspeed)

------------------------------------

Bristol Mountain Sucks

The Juvenile
 
i think i know what ur saying, with all these new companies, theyre going to be sharing customers much more which would decrease market for other companies, eventually if there more and more ski companies, lots of older ones will go broke because of the lost of costumers

___________________

I HATE NEW YORK PRODUCTIONS

i hate new york trailer

LOGIC HEADWARE> A WAY TO KEEP UR HEAD WARM LOGIC HEADWARE

 
i dont support small companies other than faction db and 4frnt. anything after that isnt bringing anything new to the table, liberty doesnt have any new and ground breaking technologies like line or DB. and they arent using any new specs like the prophet

___________________________________

'You're from Ontario, and you're an idiot, meaning that your opinion can pretty much automatically be dismissed worthless. Yes, I can back that up, I used to live there. Moving to BC really opened up my eyes to what skiing is really about. HINT: Skiing isn't about tiny verticals, shit talking, and private clubs galore. Get the fuck out of Glen Eden and Craigleith or Caledon, and get real.'-what jib this thinks of me
 
the more ski companies the betta casue more choice of skies for people to choose from

'Armada is to you: what a twinkie is to a fat kid' Tanner Hall

'Best memory on Skis: When we were swinging on the chairlift, hit a lift tower and derailed the chairs' Boyd Easley
 
i think its cool because everyone is riding different stuff.

'Hahha, I like the humpie guy! He's funny. I forget his name again even though he told me. But I know he has a humping icon and is funny like pizza.' -SDot

 
marc

You're onto something here.

they're not all going to make it, unfortunately. Only the strong (and well-backed) companies with the most heart may survive. If there are tough times, only heart and backing will pull the company through. Look at Freeze... they were funded by a company without its heart in skiing.

 
more ski companies = more competition = better skis = yay

15 years old... you cant even take the girl anywhere... you have to get laid in the back of your... bicycle? or bring your parents along... or get a ride... hey mommy, i need a ride over to my bitch's house so i can fuck her.

-crystal-needs-a-park

 
it's good to see all these companies and i don't believe it'll hurt anythign, the more the better is the way i see it.

MAINE, THE WAY LIFE SHOULD BE.
 
Take a look at skateboarding, there are never too many until you hit the level they have, where every neighborhood has its company. Hopefully it will never get that bad as making skis requires huge amounts of startup cash, while you can start putting graphics on skateboards for about 100 bucks.

_________________________________________________________

'michael moore called...said he is ready to fuck you again' - SUpilot

'Yeah, most pros are strict Mormons. I read an interview with Tanner where he talked about his experience with a caffinated beverage. He said that it screwed up his style because he was poisoning the temple that is his body. Then some of his wives left him.' - Mistaskier
 
i want the upstart companies to push out the big companies out of the market. then we wouldnt have to deal with salomon and dynastar.

dont get it twisted
 
Hopefully big ski companies will cut their prices to like, one hundred dollars which will cause the other smaller companies to become poor and die. Or maybe that is a bad idea, but I want some cheap skis somehow!!

 
aclsarescary is right. competition drives prices down. so, the more ski companies, the less expensive that skis will become.

--
 
Yeah, and the more ski companies, the more those companies are going to strive to make a more popular ski, which results in better skis being made, and better prices on them. Bring on all the ski companies that wanna start.

well thats pretty tough because my hand is a lot sexier than many females-NewSkool450

 
new companies are cool and can drive the sport but what I see is these dudes who cannot get sponsored so they start their own half ass company just to be able to sponsor themselves and their friends, its kind of a joke but hell, what do I know?

and more, much more than this, I did it my way

'So you're a skier?'

'No, I prefer to refer to myself as a double boarder'
 
^that seems kinda like whats happening right now, but what will happen is if there products are shitty then they'll either have to drop out or they will be forced to make a better product, and maybee eventually they will be a big company.

 
In another market more companies > more competition might make for lower prices, but if you think this'll happen in skiing you're having a laugh.

The freeskiing market is still niche and the smaller companies just won't be able to benefit from the economies of scale that the larger companies enjoy, so it's not in their interest to reduce prices - it would be suicide, the larger companies know this so know that they've no need to reduce their prices...

It might make for better skis though, yet how much of the technology used by these 'core' companies is really original and how much is it just hype ? Or has the industry just found another way of profiting from a changing market ?

Sorry for the nerdy first post...

 
i have full support for new and upcoming companies...it expands our sport, and lets individuals pick their specific ski....look at the skatebording world, they have hundreds of companies, and skatebording is a huge sport...if skiing had that many companies it would also grow

 
Yeah, but look at how many people skate...

I'm not dissing the small companies, all power to them, I just think it's unrealistic to think they will radically change the ski industry. One or two of them will probably make it, the rest will die and new small makes take their place. Meanwhile the ones that make it will join the big boys with the same vested interests...

 
Back
Top