hyllengren Member Jul 4, 2006 #1 could som1 plz post the picture of pollard with his 150mm prototype model... cant find it
Love_Wins. Active member Jul 5, 2006 #6 Yeah that graphic is awesome, if only the Lizzies weren't so short I'd prolly get some.
Mossko Member Jul 5, 2006 #7 Yeah those Lines seem a bit short looks like about a 170, i wont ski a twin shorter then 180. But damn those bitches would float.
Yeah those Lines seem a bit short looks like about a 170, i wont ski a twin shorter then 180. But damn those bitches would float.
skoganskier101 Active member Jul 5, 2006 #8 wow those must be totally impractical, im assuming they have no brakes lol.
ski_cartel Active member Jul 5, 2006 #10 i hear that it can actually find amost anything, while it makes you dinner
smuggs Active member Jul 5, 2006 #13 why do you want a ski that fat so when its waist deep it only goes up to your boots?
skoganskier101 Active member Jul 5, 2006 #14 actually, my friend, they are so fat that when u go faster than 20 miles per hour with them the wind cathes the tip of ther skis and u fly, or actually float above the snow, so u really are not even in contact with the snow
actually, my friend, they are so fat that when u go faster than 20 miles per hour with them the wind cathes the tip of ther skis and u fly, or actually float above the snow, so u really are not even in contact with the snow
skoganskier101 Active member Jul 6, 2006 #16 hey look at those sick skogens on the wall in the bak, i have thos skis.and i love them
Gun_It Member Jul 6, 2006 #18 in the k2 back 9 you could see the rebounding of the skis off the powder they were sooo fat. It would be hella scary trying them for me because I'm so small
in the k2 back 9 you could see the rebounding of the skis off the powder they were sooo fat. It would be hella scary trying them for me because I'm so small
bobs Active member Jul 6, 2006 #20 was that like a prototype from a couple years ago? cause those skogens are old