1260's VS Mike Nick Pro'

teneighty_skier22

teneighty_skier22

Active member
Hey guys,

My little bro has seen the error in his ways and is going from skiboards to twins, he want either of those skis, primarily for Bumps and Park....lemme know wich is better so I can pass it on.

Scottie thanks you...

^

My Bro

lata, Jeffree

-------------------------------------------------

Co-commander of The NS Isle Community

Guerilla Trooper of the Silent Army!

::Viva La Ressistance::
 
I have the Mike Nicks and my friend has the 1260s (163cm) and he says he wishes he got the MN's. I love mine, they are the shit.

 
The 1260 will probably handle better in the bumps than the MN will, due to the narrower waist. Also, the 1260 has a broader size range than the pro models (you only get 171 in the MN and 176 in the SS).

Free your heel:

Free your mind
 
I saw that way too, I just got the Skogens, they seem like a good ski for park, and if you look at the lengths and width etc.last years skogens match up with almost all the specs as this years 1260's except the tail height... I thought that was cool!

-i just farted, can you smell it?-
 
k2skier shut the fuck up. I love my 1260s (last years), they handle so nicy and are real good for switch landings and spinning. 1260s and Mike Nicks are almost the same, Mike Nick used to ride the 1260s some times.

------------------

get hyped version 2 - coming sometime 2003

-------------------

get hyped | get hyped | get hyped
 
I think he's decided to go with the Mike Nicks, thanks for all the help!

:)

-------------------------------------------------

Co-commander of The NS Isle Community

Guerilla Trooper of the Silent Army!

::Viva La Ressistance::
 
Get mavericks. they are the best line ski. they carve awsome and still dominate in the park. plus there's a chinese guy on the tail! how could you go wrong with that?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top