I'll tell you what the problem with it is:
Freeskier really could care less that these girls  ski. I'm pretty conviced they are more interested in shots of Jess Cummings in her underwear and pushing their 'FHM' vibe on skiing than actual raw skiing tallent. They'll argue all day long otherwise, but until they produce a piece on womens skiing that features nothing but womens skiing (not barley legal girls in their underwear combing each others hair) I won't buy it.
Grete is a perfect example of this, aguably the best woman freeskier of they year last season, coming out of completly out of nowhere and winning the two most major events that women can compete in, The Rip Curl at Sass Fee, as well as
The US Freesking open Slopestyle.
Instead of having a double page spread at the front of the article hailing her achivments, she's put in the very back of the article with minimal coverage. Somthing tells me this is because she wasn't around for 'the lets get half naked photo shoot' that the girls up in the front of the article participated in.
Furthermore, the way freeskier magazine casts the light on  womens skiing as a sexual exposé sends the wrong message to young girls getting into the sport. Its telling them hey, if you wanna be a pro female skier, you better take off your clothes for our cameras.
and Ethan, I don't even agree with the 97% male readership card either. If they need scantilly clad ski girls in their magazine to boost readership, then they are doing somthing wrong with the rest of their 'ski' magazine.
---------------------------------------------------------
qualities solidity well finished after sale services (if broken, ..). so what do you think? out of one fact: armadas black and PINK is ugly and faggy!