06 trouble makers vs. 06 scratch fs

both really good skis to have the fs is alot stiffer then the t.m and it holds an edge good so like more all mt stuff. the tm is still good everywhere but just more for park b/c of the flex of it(real soft)......but if you are looking for park go tm b/c of the spring blade tec( gives ski bunch of pop) but if you do just be careful of the edges b/c who knows if they actually fix it from last year....b/c i know ppl who destroyed last years
 
since when are the TM soft... ihave had all dynastar twins from the start and they all have a consistent flex and a slightly stiffer tail.. allowing for more pop. they handle great all mtn.. read more reviews before you post about shit you dont even own
 
im pretty sure that they didn't change the edge from last years TM and this years. so be careful of the edge blowing out. i have last years scratch FS and i love them.
 
I just back from a demo night trying all this years skis, and I have to say, the T-M is a charm riding it regular or switch. The new scratch is very stiff for a park ski (I don't enjoy that very much) and so carving switch won't be as easy going. History tells us that the edges for the TM's won't hold up, let alone that the scratch is probably one of the more solide skis on the market right now. Here's my advice. If you the kind of guy that skis the whole mountain and like a fun ski, lots of pop, that likes big-air and pipe more then rails, and that loves riding switch, go with the TM. If you're the kinda guy that will do prettu much anything, but loves rails, ledges and urban, def go with the Scratch. It's not cauz it's more fun, it's just that it won't break as easy.
 
Back
Top