Search results

Would have been so sick if Dieder would have plowed Jason with a right hook. Who gives a fuck who kissed who, you shouldn't have been in the situation in the first place bitch. WHACK,SPLAT,BOOM!

I'll second that. I thought of those two immediately when I read this. Lat is cool though and Atl was a douche.

June Mtn. for best overall park. Bear Mtn. for best jib park. Mammoth or PC for best Jumps. Bear Mtn. in SoCal is by far the MOST underrated park by skiers. Period.

Ours has Armada, Line, K2, Salomon and Volkl twins.

Phrosty, Seanpistol..... You boys go take a time out in the corner. This is not your thread. Becker is good.

1. No it wasn't the point he said that they were superior BECAUSE they allowed the binding to flex underfoot. Not because they were first. Being first to do something doesn't always mean you were the best anyway. Look at the Reactor for proof. Better bindings will come along. 2. He used Rossi...

If you decide you want to go shorter, my store has 175 ARV's

Dude, I think you are wrong again. They don't own NIKE. If they did I'm quite sure it would be on their website. An excerpt from their site: Amer Sports is the world's leading sports equipment companies with its internationally recognized brands Wilson, Atomic, Suunto, Precor and Salomon.

You must be talking to someone else.

You might be a better skier than me but more accomplished in Athletics I highly doubt brother. You don't know me or anything about me. You might not be impressed but you have been owned. Go to sleep, it won't hurt so bad in the morning.

All things that I have been plenty capable of figuring out on my own. That feature is nothing more than hype geared towards the technology influenced customer. It does nothing to help skiing performance or safety of release. In fact, it's just one more thing that would end up breaking if anyone...

Your original post was not about Atomic's inspiration on other manufacturers but a statement that their system was superior. Now you are back tracking and stating that they simply inspired other systems. Which is it?

Hahahah. Have you read ANYTHING that I have posted? To reiterate: You were right about one thing...I was the first binding system that flexes with the ski. It DOES NOT have a greater size range over everyone elses bindings. But even if you were right, WHO GIVES A FUCK? Last time I checked...

I concur. Awesome movie.

340mm isn't bigger than most other bindings. In fact its smaller than some others as well. 340 equates to about a 30.5 boot size. That's a sz. 12.5 U.S. shoe. Much different than your original size 38 boot.

Wrong, this helps but does not eliminate the problem of back twisting falls. In a back twisting fall the toepiece must act as a pivot point for the heel to be released in the proper manner. Upwards release is present on Marker and Rossi bindings as well. Yet ACL injuries continue to rise.

You are missing the screw that is in the center of the heelpiece of the binding.

Those metal inserts are no stronger than the metal laminate topsheets that are featured on many skis. They WILL strip out if you try to pull your bindings off and put them back on too many times. This is one of the great pitfalls of binding plates. Like I said, there are at least 8 and 9 on...

I was wrong about the Salomon Pilot system. I was correct about the rest of my ponts. If you mount bindings without checking forward pressure and toe height you are an idiot and not doing correctly. You still cannot swap Atomic bindings between skis because the holes in the plates (which are...

Ok, I'm bored and you're an idiot here's why.... 1. There are several binding systems out there that allow the ski to flex underfoot. Tyrolia, Marker, Atomic and Salomon all have them. 2. Prerelease is always a debatable topic but one thing is a fact...Rossi bindings are not known for...