Search results

blends, to me, make an a better all mountain ski. wider, stiffer (to hold up better when the snow isnt good) but still playful. the new design rules. arvs are great, i would love to ride a pair mounted for me, and for more than a few runs at a demo. they were a lot of fun, and def could be...

it comes down to what you want to do, how you ski. personally, id say bacons. dimensions are shweet to ski all the time, in deep snow and days after the deep snow has gone. something rockered pigeon holes you, something too stiff isnt gonna be as playful, or as fun on deep days. something too...

i like elan, they make some good product, but everytime ive skied them, nothing has stood out to me. its great to see a company really back their product with great service, but i like to see a great ski with the same service behind it

you're fired. suspects are on the medium-soft side. not a bad choice. t-halls are gonna be softer than ar6s (im pretty sure) and invaders wouldnt be bad at all. they do take a beating even tho its a cheaper ski. in years past id say stay away from invaders, but the quality has gone up huge...

in the prophets? because of ur weight ur gonna want to go with the longest ski they make. itll feel so much more stable (im 200 lbs, so im used to skiing the longest skis too)

thats a lot of blue that doesnt match.

nothing ninth makes will ever be ski of the year. out west, jjs. east coast, extremes. overall, i think line will close the gap on overall twin sales behind k2.

extremes will have a similar flex to your chronics and the same waist. the only benefit to getting them would be you can get them longer. as for prophet 90s, id shy away. if u were doing less park than you are, theyd be solid. the metal in them scares me in the park. theyll work, but i would...

all personal preference amigo. too soft for me, and thats saying a lot as i love anthems. to each his own.

i mostly agree with the guy above. disorderlys will perform much better out of the park as well. just to touch on one quick point... the only things k2 and line share are 1) the same parent company and 2) the same manufacturing plant. design, construction, all that? different.

do the boots fit your feet? what type of skiing are you doing? where? ur measurements? are u just getting it because of the hype?

pretty much everything you said just failed. theres no such thing as a park specific binding. eps are an incredible soft playful ski and not designed to charge. the only thing that makes sths "designed for a wider ski" is u can get a 130mm brake.

ignitor and sensor mirror for life! oh wait, oakley, not smith. fire and highest intensity yellow.

dude hes 145 pounds, he doesnt need anything with a din that high. and the jester/griffon are the only bindings with a wider hole pattern, none of the others u mentioned are. u narrowed it down to three good choices, dont listen to the garbage advice u get on here from kids who have no idea...

agreed

the riser platform on every binding is plastic, if it wasnt it would be retarded heavy. that being said, i favor the px platform over almost everything else. great elastic travel, locks u into the ski well, isnt too heavy, consistent release, and durable. just super solid

they dont have a strong spring to keep them up and drop and catch at times. in my experience.

i expected more from this thread.

walls would be dope for a park ski, especially if you have another ski to use for the rest of the time. they are a bit pricey, but super sweet flex, center mounted, suuuuper durable. chronics are also going to rule. not centered, and centering them makes them a bit twitchy if ur skiing them all...

new lighter weight core. and improved durability.