Search results

not the super nobies....just the reg 89 mm waist ones. But they were both little girls and bought the 178's so blach for them giveitawaygiveitawaygiveitawaynow

2 of my buddies bought them last year and both of em broke them. albeit they were summit county ski bums, and skied every day or so.....choose wisely giveitawaygiveitawaygiveitawaynow

not to sound like a jerk but unless you plan on landing/taking off switch i dunno if you really even need a park ski. It sounds like you just wanna jump on the trend of twintips. Any pair of head's or salomon skis would prob suite you just fine giveitawaygiveitawaygiveitawaynow

if you plan on jumping or hucking cliffs do not buy markers....vertical release is a bad thing for those two aspects....i only mountlook/rossi binding, most reliable and longest lasting giveitawaygiveitawaygiveitawaynow

shiny black frames with fire mirrored lens. perfect condition with goggle bag.....best offer gets them giveitawaygiveitawaygiveitawaynow

another question, who remembers back in the day when this website started grabbing people off of the lineskis.com forum? haha how times have changed....

anyone remember the bomber weekend at Jay 2 seasons ago in March? Sickest weekend i can recall. about 80 some-odd inches in a 3 day period. Needless to say, best 2 days of east coast skiing.....ever......makes me question why i moved out west...j/k

talk about reminisence......toxic grabs...whatever happened to them? I think there are a few possibilities. 1) Has a toxic grab been reduced to the cheesyness of the daffy or spread eagle. 2) could it just be that it is not cool to call a tailgrab 'toxic' anymore? 3) Maybe its just that this...

def. 20gb memory cards out there, but the biggest one you can put into an mp3 player is like 2gb. Ipod = overrated and bulky. I guess its cool to have like 3000 hours of music on a player that has a 8 hour battery. 256mb-512mb is plenty and lightweight as funk.

ooo, i was torn between buying those and fischers.....went for the fischers. I hear they are insane skis for ripping frontside and light backside days, but heavy crud or equally angry terrain and they get no love. I am jealous...

i demoe'd the BC's last year at Vail. Fun ski to rip through crud and stomp cliffs, but everyday ride? Eh who am i to judge, i ride 84mm Fischers as my 'everything else besides keystone' ski.

shit, i stand corected than, sorry smugs, gotta go whoop my bud who is tellin me this BS

smuggs you dont know shit man, they have changed their policy for 2003-04, duuude. $325 for V-Pros? where you gettin that deal?? -Dave

'.....more original rather than a follower who only wears or buys what the companies tell him to......' Hahaha, hes so original and anti-corporate....pssst, dude your icon is a fucking ski company logo... wtf?? Sorry to bust your balls, i just love hipocrites

Im gonna hafta retract my previous statement, the 2004's are made of composite/carbon material. I know there are heated debates regarding foam/wood/composite cores, however, the BigStix's used to be a wood core ski, of which they were touted a stable cadillac cruise. The new carbon core skis are...

Judging by the way you asked/stated the question.... you obviously have no idea what a pro form is. A 'proform' is something us people within the skiing industry can get from individual companies to buy stuff at discount, 'pro' prices. Example Line skis have there own pro-form, being a damn...

2004 Fischer big stix 86, unbelievable ride....10x better looking than last years, if you like to ski, and dont care about owning the name (aka armada or k2...fuck that shit) ride a quality race bred pow pow ski