Don't know why the conversion failed. Here is the vimeo link:<br>
<a target=_BLANK href="http://www.vimeo.com/18054734">http://www.vimeo.com/18054734</a>
am i the only one not digging this?<br>
don't get me wrong: smooth and styly edit.<br>
but fuck, i'm exspecting more than 540s as a best move in a pro skier's edit.<br>
not against shifty sometimes to make a 360 look good, but in every damn move?<br>
and landing sideways with a shifty on the ground? really?<br>
everyone so amazed at that and pissed at bio 14? <br>
or does everyone love this cause it makes them feel like they can do the same tricks as a pro skier?
agreed, those tricks are kind of easy. I do love mike hornbeck style but he should learn something bigger than a 900 or a 4 out... i have never seen a bigger trick than that from him... He is a restricted skier... no pow, no comp, no tech trick ??? But still, he can have some good stylish shots for ski movie
^its because he is doing what he wants. and he is making it look incredibly easy. At the same time everybody has there individual opinion, personally i think what hornbeck does is really sick, but there are many others who dont.
hornbeck has always been one of my favorite skiers. although this edit was kinda disappointing, i dont think not spinning over 9 is the problem. you can put out the sickest edit ever with only spins up to 9 with bangin style... this edit was just kinda weak
@afterbang- i would agree. Hornbeck's parts are some of my favorite segments in Level 1 every year. He compensates lack of tech by amazing style and i respect that. But this is weak. Ask any pro to do a couple 540s and blind sw ups over the summer and any of them could do just as well.<br>
@Ncurry- i do what i want too. don't you?<br>
@wisconsinsteeze- thanks for your open-minded addition to all this.
