Why so much hype for Revelstoke?

Kulharin

Member
So; I've been skiing in Revelstoke since the 2010-2011 season. Probably half a dozen times every season.. And yes, it is a great mountain with great terrain, but thinking about it I've had just as much fun skiing at most of the interior BC ski resorts on a good day as I've had at Revelstoke... I actually miss skiing at the more laid back/less competitive resorts where you don't have to line up before 7:30 on a powder day to beat the crowds, and yes crowds are a real thing now as much as the hype and marketing will say otherwise.. on busy powder weekends, average morning line ups can be upwards of 20 minutes at the chairlift. But that's too be expected when you have an 8 person Gondola leading only to a Quad chair, with terrain below it marginal or unskiiable for half the season.

I've had a lot of fun days skiing at Revelstoke, but the world-wide hype for it I feel is exaggerated. Not to sound bitter as I still enjoy skiing there, but my personal observations that I feel go overlooked when it comes to how "awesome" it is here.

-Most vertical in north america, yet half of the vertical is marginal or unskiiable for half the ski season on average due to low elevation.

-Majority is SW aspect and impacted heavily by wind and sun.

-Lying about snowfall. The mountain claims up to to 14m of snow annually, our best season we saw 12.5 meters. On average we get around 11m of snow a year in the alpine... Half of that falling as rain on the lower 1/3 of the mountain.

-The phenomenal bowl skiing... much you have to hike into or hike out of...

-Terrain funnels that force the majority of skiers from the big terrain into some pretty tight awful places once they get skied out.

-Big line ups and early line ups on powder days.

-Terrain gets skied out very quickly now as it's busy and a lot talented riders on the mountain will see most of the mountain skied out by early afternoon unless you're hiking.

-Very little on mountain facilities and infrastructure

-Very little terrain for beginners and intermediates... much of it is cat tracks or on the lower mountain.

-Some of the glading been great while some has have actually destroyed some of the fun terrain that once existed on the mountain... Such as Jalapeno before they clearcut it, Stop at the road glades before they carved a cat track through it, the terrain park which ended up exposing a lovely gladed area to the wind and no longer holds the snow as it once did.

-Almost no gladed terrain on the lower 2/3rds of the mountain aside from a few places.

-For half the season you're pretty much just skiing two chairs and 1/3 of the mountains vertical.

-Owners who don't care remotely about skiing and have little interest in real improvements on the mountain; all they do is spit propaganda.

That being said Revelstoke has a lot of un-tapped potential in terms of terrain... and it can certainly live up to the hype that's been built around it... For now, I see it much like Kicking Horse... a place that's fun on a good day with a lot of unrealized potential and a master plan that has barely moved an inch in the last decade... with some pretty awful owners.

The town itself is great, aside from people being pretty high on how awesome they are. And the high cost of accommodations.

**This thread was edited on Jan 1st 2018 at 10:14:38pm
 
Going there for the first time in a week

Kinda a bummer to read but I get it. When I tell people I’m heading there I’m surprised how many people have heard of it.
 
If it snows top to bottom and you get there early then it is pretty amazing riding, but expect lines and crowds...

If it doesn't snow there are no lines or crowds but the conditions wont be as good. Hopefully we get some good dumps before then because coverage on the lower half of the mountain is currently very marginal as we literally had a 0 snow base on the lower mountain until two weeks ago... But coverage on the upper mountain is good.
 
Revelstoke in my eyes is the only resort in the world with inbounds spines and 5 stack pillows without hiking

look harder there is a reason why guys like sammy carlson come here for seasons
 
13874946:hemlockjibber8 said:
Because people don't differentiate between revelstoke the resort, the slack country and the sled zones. It's all marketing.

this

plus i mean it probably is one of the better resorts in NA. OP your post makes perfect sense and is totally legit but you have to remember you live in BC. for a lot of us, when we describe a resort as sick, that is in the context of the selection in the lower 48, maybe even in the northeast or the midwest haha. so in relation to almost any of those places, revelstoke is an amazing place

but like this^ dude said, it's also just a marketing thing. people see great shots from "revelstoke" all the time and it becomes a thing that revelstoke is unreal
 
There are prolly 2-3x as many skiers since 2013/2014 season. The terrain park was pointless given the mountain itself is a terrain park and they completely destroyed a wonderful glade to build it.

But yes as a town and not a resort Revelstoke is a beast. The monastery range on the west side of the valley gets 50 perfect more snow than the resort. Averaging 15-16m. This is sled n backcountry terrain.
 
A lot of what you said is very true but I think us interior of B.C. People are spoiled to have skied there for so long. Comparatively to many other resorts Revelstoke is way ahead in terms of snow and gnarly terrain. I haven’t skied any U.S resorts but compared to whistler and the other interior resorts there is so much terrain with marginal lines. For example look at the peak chair at whistler on a pow day that line up is insane! Yes there are other areas but by the time you get to them they are often all skied out. As for the hiking sometimes you gotta pay to play and really the hikes aren’t that bad and most of the time it is worth it. Lastly 99% of resorts inflate their snow total, it brings more people.

To summarize: revelstoke is not perfect but it’s pretty dam good for a young resort still growing.
 
I've been living here for 6 years and learned to ski here when I was 3. The reason there are lineups at the bottom is pretty self explanatory with the gondola, but I have literally never waited 20 minutes at the stoke chair. There is tonnes of good terrain in lower mountain. When it dumps 30cm I ski mid mountain until about 11am.

Basically the only thing is the summer time is getting busier and rent is going up because it's growing in popularity. Come ski a pow day mid week in February or March and there isn't many people here at all. Every time I go ski somewhere else I just keep thinking that it would be better skiing in Revy.
 
13874955:Kulharin said:
the mountain itself is a terrain park

I find the complete opposite. There are hardly any inbounds sends to be had. If you're skiing marked runs then there's pretty much nowhere to get any air that's not cliff drops.

Definitely an amazing mountain, but I agree that the inbounds is a little over rated.
 
It's easy to be a jaded local. But the goal for the resort is to get vacationers who actually spend money stoked on coming to the place they have invested millions in.
 
13875876:VinnieF said:
I find the complete opposite. There are hardly any inbounds sends to be had. If you're skiing marked runs then there's pretty much nowhere to get any air that's not cliff drops.

Definitely an amazing mountain, but I agree that the inbounds is a little over rated.

Also super untrue. Side hits everywhere. There is a reason they have junior and adult freeski competitions right next to the chairlift. There are some serious sends everywhere on RMR. I know it sounds like I'm riding RMR's dick right now, but this thread is like listening to tourists say that there isn't much good on the mountain even though they saw a fraction on it. You need time to know your way around Rmr.
 
Well terrain features I guess would be a better description, but in terms of rails and jumps the terrain park was of course needed but they did clear a lot more then was necessary width-wise... I heard this was actually a mistake and they weren't suppose to remove as many trees as they did. This spoiled a great section of the Tasty / Hollywood glades... The area doesn't hold the snow like it used to some fun intermediate glades were removed entirely.

I don't dispute that there is great terrain on the lower mountain, but the snow conditions are not good half the season on an average year. Last year was the first year in awhile I can remember good conditions top to bottom for an extended length. This year the snowpack below mid mountain is still incredibly shallow for this time of year and 2014/2015, 2015/2016 were too warm that there was less than a month of good conditions on the lower half... If you've never had to wait 20 minutes at the stoke then you've never skied a powder weekend where good snow conditions were limited to the upper mountain, or holiday weekends. Hell I even had a 20 minute wait at the Ripper chair on the 29th of Dec.

It also doesn't help that all the beginners are pushed to the stoke chair often causing the chair to be frequently stopped or slowed. It's a poor layout for beginners and early intermediates especially when conditions are bad on the lower half of the mountain. Build char 11 and 15 and that'll be a game changer.
 
13875952:Pancake_Fucker said:
Double post but here's one run. He even missed a bunch of hits.

1 is cliff drop, 2 is gnarly and sweet. The rest are park hits.

I've skied a lot of resorts and know what a place full of sends vs not full is like. Revelstoke just isn't as full of them as other resorts. I've maybe had 7 or 8 days there now and your average run has way fewer opportunities for cat track gaps or side hits or whatever than other resorts in the area. Maybe it's loaded with them for people like Chris Rubens (his second hit I wouldn't do and his first either if I had first tracks or without as much speed), so maybe I'm just a pussy and not looking at the right places. I just haven't had as much difficulty out west as at Revelstoke for finding hits on named runs.

Also this isn't really a detractor, there's still so much terrain and amazing snow. It's still one of the best resorts I've skied, I just think it's a little too hyped up for what you get. I agree with previous comments that this hype is probably from people not differentiating inbounds and slack country, cat skiing, etc
 
Revy is by far my favourite hill. and yep years ago it was unknown to almost everyone it seemed. But its gaining popularity and if we need someone to blame that on I'd say social media. Seems every other post on the gram has Revelstoke tagged in it. Personally I'm hoping to see the hill and inbounds access expand. Another lift or two would be cool, the people would spread out and the terrain access would be amazing.
 
By no means is it bad... It's a great place to ski, but there are a lot of great places to ski in BC with a lot of potential to expand as well... I just don't feel it lives up to the worldwide hype behind it so much as they just have really good marketing and sell people more so on the town and the area as opposed to the ski resort. Until they put a new lift it RMR's best days in it's early years can never be replicated.

**This post was edited on Jan 4th 2018 at 9:53:29pm
 
Hm, maybe the hype died this year! ... This week and into the weekend has been very quiet on the mountain with no line ups; not what you'd expect from an 80cm week during peak season. This reminds me of 4-5 years ago; not sure what's up but there could be a few factors in play.
 
13879442:Kulharin said:
Hm, maybe the hype died this year! ... This week and into the weekend has been very quiet on the mountain with no line ups; not what you'd expect from an 80cm week during peak season. This reminds me of 4-5 years ago; not sure what's up but there could be a few factors in play.

This year is nowhere near as busy as last year. Everyone that wants to ski here has already, and no upgrades have been done other than adding capacity to existing lifts. Also, this is typical for mid week, and mid January is not peak season in revy.
 
Christmas until the end of March I consider peak season in Revy. Peaking during the Christmas holidays, and mid Feb during the back to back long weekends... Spring break too is a spike, leading into the Easter weekend this year. April and December before Christmas the mountain is very quiet.

But numbers feel like they've dropped by around 20% this year... early morning line starting later, and not as many people lining up... This is weekdays though, I don't often ski on the weekends anymore but I imagine they are quite a bit busier. A lot more out of towners and fewer locals on the weekend

Rumor has it Nortlands won't ever build another lift because they are pissed off at the city for approving an adjacent competing development on a piece land they declined to purchase years prior... they've been whining about it like a little bitch with a skinned knee... though other rumors suggest a new lift in two years... time will tell.
 
13883485:Kulharin said:
Christmas until the end of March I consider peak season in Revy. Peaking during the Christmas holidays, and mid Feb during the back to back long weekends... Spring break too is a spike, leading into the Easter weekend this year. April and December before Christmas the mountain is very quiet.

But numbers feel like they've dropped by around 20% this year... early morning line starting later, and not as many people lining up... This is weekdays though, I don't often ski on the weekends anymore but I imagine they are quite a bit busier. A lot more out of towners and fewer locals on the weekend

Rumor has it Nortlands won't ever build another lift because they are pissed off at the city for approving an adjacent competing development on a piece land they declined to purchase years prior... they've been whining about it like a little bitch with a skinned knee... though other rumors suggest a new lift in two years... time will tell.

Funny thing about them whining is they signed a contract to have way more lifts in now as part of the agreement to get approval. The resort breached that before that adventure park got approved. Lots of bad business deals going on here lately, imo. Nothing skier focused. But ski resorts get money in real estate and food sales so they don't really gain from lifts.
 
a couple of years back, my brother and friend were gearing up at the Golden McDonald's for a day of sled skiing. Rogers Pass was closed. He talked to some kids and asked why they weren't taking advantage of the 20-30cm day at Kicking Horse, instead waiting out the road closure so they could (unlikely) ski Revelstoke. HYPE
 
Back
Top