I think what I said was that many of the people who either have been educated, or educate, in that cesspool of progressive brainwashing, have a tendency to ignore reality, and instead bask in each other's smugness and think up illogical idea that generally relate to some form of socialism and/or communism, but always stupidity.
Likewise, I never said that I believe the government has no business in the private sector. I do however, know that every time the government muddles around in the private sector we, the citizens, by definition and simple math, inherently loose freedoms. There is a too fold reduction in freedom. First off, there is by necessity, a loss of your basic freedom to do whatever you so wished to do, since the government will need to make regulations; regulations that will by default restrict your and my ability to do whatever the hell we wish. The second side, is the loss of monetary freedom. This is in itself the main issue with Communism, and most Socialist models. They require that the citizenry give up the freedom to spend their money, their earnings, in a way which they please. The government must pay for all the things that it does and doesn't do,* and that money does not just pop out of the ground. "There is no such thing as public money, their is only taxpayer's money" [1]. Of course, many of the worthless scum that fester in the aforementioned cesspool of stupid, are not themselves taxpayers, and thus have no issue planning up great ways to spend other people's money. This is of course why the democratic party is a leach upon our country, since it is by and large, made up mostly by people who only draw out of the tax revenue, but hardly ever put in to the tax revenue.
Going to Whitman is wasting your time.
Also, the 'uneducated libertarian' attack, while a generic response from the leaches in academia, is about as educated and refined as the automatic distrust that many social conservatives have for anything coming from someone with letters other than BS after their name.