Which State Would Win in a 50 State Civil War

14526532:Icant_kfed said:
Pussyfornia will be the first state to go down. Florida Texas or New York will be victorious

wow based icant_kfed W maybe ur redpilled now.. also i hate this is the 51st message, now it's gonna be the first on the second page
 
Not S Carolina. We won the first war we helped start. Lost the second one.. S Carolina may have got a little overzealous the second time..

Turns our southern food makes you fat and fat rednecks can’t run

My money is on utah. All the Mormons get provisions for presents. They’re ready.

*amending this because utah has water issues. War is a TON of logistics. Not just firepower

**This post was edited on Apr 5th 2023 at 11:52:46am

**This post was edited on Apr 5th 2023 at 11:53:42am
 
New Question - who would win if they all had to fight with swords and armour and horse calvary like the middle ages?
 
14526581:PacificRimJob said:
New Question - who would win if they all had to fight with swords and armour and horse calvary like the middle ages?

Chat-N.L. has the wisdom and forethought to beat AI,

There would be no fighting , We would all starve.
 
14526532:Icant_kfed said:
Pussyfornia will be the first state to go down. Florida Texas or New York will be victorious

The terrifying Florida Mechanized Brigade consisting entirely of overweight retirees in their fancy golf carts that they use to get around the neighborhood wielding hi-points would be a site to behold.
 
14526536:SteezyYeeter said:
wow based icant_kfed W maybe ur redpilled now.. also i hate this is the 51st message, now it's gonna be the first on the second page

I always have been, I just understand both sides of the perspective to a degree
 
14526239:Lippamani said:
just civilian gorilla warfare

California on top still, most populated, richest, diverse geography and ocean border plus a huge rural population. Assuming the state is unified its gotta be them.

If each state isn't unified, I think we'd see a rural vs city divide where tons of people flock to Texas to join the conservative army and they come out top
 
Everyone saying California forgets about the San Andreas Fault. Cali is one poke in the right spot away from sliding into the ocean. It's like y'all never even seen the 2015 film "San Andreas" starring Alexandra Daddario and Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. ?

1068597.png
 
14526644:Lenny- said:
Everyone saying California forgets about the San Andreas Fault. Cali is one poke in the right spot away from sliding into the ocean. It's like y'all never even seen the 2015 film "San Andreas" starring Alexandra Daddario and Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. ?

View attachment 1068597

i tried to watch that a couple weeks ago
 
14526644:Lenny- said:
Everyone saying California forgets about the San Andreas Fault. Cali is one poke in the right spot away from sliding into the ocean. It's like y'all never even seen the 2015 film "San Andreas" starring Alexandra Daddario and Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. ?

Yes. Every film starring The Rock is guaranteed to be loaded with truths. Youre fuckin right about that.

It cracks me up whenever people portray California as a place that's due to slip into the Pacific when the San Andreas is a strike-slip fault and all that will happen is LA will become a few inches closer to the Bay Area - a tragedy in its own right, but Nothing is falling into the sea.
 
14526776:dognuts said:
i tried to watch that a couple weeks ago

Was it bad??

14526789:PacificRimJob said:
Yes. Every film starring The Rock is guaranteed to be loaded with truths. Youre fuckin right about that.

It cracks me up whenever people portray California as a place that's due to slip into the Pacific when the San Andreas is a strike-slip fault and all that will happen is LA will become a few inches closer to the Bay Area - a tragedy in its own right, but Nothing is falling into the sea.

1068652.jpeg
 
14526899:Lenny- said:
Was it bad??

i mean it wasn’t the worst movie ever but i did not finish it

also hawaii would win they got like the navy probably and all they would need to do if just nuke the entire mainland
 
14526906:dognuts said:
hawaii would win they got like the navy probably and all they would need to do if just nuke the entire mainland

California has the majority of the Pacific fleet based in San Diego.
 
itd be more or less rural america vs the cities and in that case, the rural dwellers would win since they have all the guns. Cities have resources, but ngl, id fuckin drive a massive tractor on the highway with a machine gun attached if I had to for the greater good. Go out in a blaze of glory. pew pew
 
14526988:SmokedGouda said:
itd be more or less rural america vs the cities and in that case, the rural dwellers would win since they have all the guns. Cities have resources, but ngl, id fuckin drive a massive tractor on the highway with a machine gun attached if I had to for the greater good. Go out in a blaze of glory. pew pew

only 20% of the US is rural though. So every single person in rural America would have to kill 4+ people.....das a lot. Normal doctrine calls for a 3 to 1 invasion force....so yall are lacking and those cities are boutta be hungryyyy
 
14527004:Profahoben_212 said:
only 20% of the US is rural though. So every single person in rural America would have to kill 4+ people.....das a lot. Normal doctrine calls for a 3 to 1 invasion force....so yall are lacking and those cities are boutta be hungryyyy

rural america controls the food though. Shut off the imports to cities and theyll crumble and cause infighting. Cities will then die from the inside out.
 
14527006:SmokedGouda said:
rural america controls the food though. Shut off the imports to cities and theyll crumble and cause infighting. Cities will then die from the inside out.

Thats what I said. Urban America boutta be hungry. Any decent commander/politician would realize this and direct anger and all military efforts into steamrolling into farmland first. It would barely be a fight. ARs ain't gonna do shit when a battalion of abrams come rolling through hot looking to take your corn
 
14527006:SmokedGouda said:
rural america controls the food though. Shut off the imports to cities and theyll crumble and cause infighting. Cities will then die from the inside out.

Rural america has been threatening this for years and they never fucking would lol.
 
14525867:Lonely said:
Michigan for sure. To attack through the south at some point you'd have to be within 50 miles of Ohio or Gary Indiana and nobody wants to be anywhere near that shit.

But then the big question becomes what would the upper peninsula do? The love for Michigan is strong, but we do try and secede from the lower peninsula every now and again. Maybe team up with Minnesota and Wisconsin and call it the "superior state alliance".

Regionally, the Midwest would kick everyones ass. It has just the right amount of industry, natural resources, firearms, and individuals with an IQ above 40.

The south would get their shit rocked no matter who they were up against

And we are gonna annex the Ontario Peninsula. SI QUAERIS PENINSULAM AMOENAM CIRCUMSPICE MOTHER FUCKERS
 
Stupid question

I can guarantee you that no state will go out of their way to conquer every state, including Alaska and Hawaii, so therefore there can be no single “winner”

The smaller states will quickly realize that they have no chance of winning on their own, and as a result will form alliances with larger, more powerful states.

I predict that three alliances will form: One will be made up of the midwest and east coast, with the capital being New York City; one will be the southern states, with the capital in Atlanta; and one made up of the states west of the Rocky Mountains, with the capital being in Seattle.

Alaska and Hawaii will choose to stay neutral, because they know that no state will go out of their way to attack them unless provoked.

The east coast/Midwest alliance will win through a long, defensive war. With the manufacturing power of Pennsylvania, the economic prosperity of New York, and the food production of the Midwest, no state will be able to keep the war effort strong as long as this group.

The New York alliance would control the continental states, and Alaska and Hawaii would form their own governments and go on as independent nations.
 
Im throwing my hat in the ring for North Carolina. It has Camp Lejune, Fort Brag, Seymor Johnson Airforce Base, and several other smaller bases. It can easily defend its major ports and has transportation via rivers throughout the state. It has natural barriers on the east and west sides. It isn't dependent on other states for water or food. It has a large gun-owning population. Many large nuclear and hydroelectric power stations.
 
I think your right actually! This is probably 80% accurate

14527157:Vish-shoe said:
Stupid question

I can guarantee you that no state will go out of their way to conquer every state, including Alaska and Hawaii, so therefore there can be no single “winner”

The smaller states will quickly realize that they have no chance of winning on their own, and as a result will form alliances with larger, more powerful states.

I predict that three alliances will form: One will be made up of the midwest and east coast, with the capital being New York City; one will be the southern states, with the capital in Atlanta; and one made up of the states west of the Rocky Mountains, with the capital being in Seattle.

Alaska and Hawaii will choose to stay neutral, because they know that no state will go out of their way to attack them unless provoked.

The east coast/Midwest alliance will win through a long, defensive war. With the manufacturing power of Pennsylvania, the economic prosperity of New York, and the food production of the Midwest, no state will be able to keep the war effort strong as long as this group.

The New York alliance would control the continental states, and Alaska and Hawaii would form their own governments and go on as independent nations.
 
Back
Top