What's the best 1 quiver ski for a gal?

wildflower541

New member
Hey ladies, I want to hear your thoughts or experience on a good all around ski to shred in the park and the pow. Maybe even rip a few turns on some corduroy too. Let me know!
 
Super biased bc they are all I have really skied on the past 7+ years... but ON3P's are worth the investment for a single quiver ski. Still riding Jeronimos from 2011 or smthin... super durable. I have had shorter seasons the past few years which might be a part of them lasting so long, but I have skied them hard on every type of terrain. The tip randomly delamned once a couple seasons in, and the edge has started ripping out but mostly due to not caring for them properly.

I got a new pair of Jessie 98's (I think) 2 seasons ago for a setup dedicated more to freeskiing, and put touring bindings on them. The graphics are always rad which is step one haha, but I liked that the had a similar build to the J-Mo's. I'm now wishing I just stuck a regular pair of bindings on them because they rip in the park and all-around too.

If you have the $$$, I would snag a pair of Jessie 98's. They'll be stable ripping down groomers, fun in the park, and you'll still be able to float and charge lines in the pow! I did my first freeski comp on them and they stood up. Hope that helps.
 
I am very partial to my JSkis whipits, size 161. I've been on womens park skis for years and I believe that these are better than what I previously rode. I got a new pair of lines each season from a sponsorship and then had won some women's armadas. Loved them both but the game really changed when I got the whipits. Check out their reviews on his site. You may even love the all plays
 
I like the Rossignol Slat or the Faction prodigy. Both are 98 underfoot and a little longer length than I would ride for park only (I ski the 169 length, I'm 5'2). You are always making trade offs when you go for a one quiver ski so you have to keep that in mind and decide what to prioritize. I like a damp ski for do-it-all, since it often means I'm riding more of a mix of pow, crud and chop, it also translates into a good ski for sloppy spring slush (you won't get as bounced around in mashed potatoes). I'm always chasing a 20meter sidecut, since that's the most versatile sidecut, but it's hard to find in a sub 170 length ski. Ski manufacturers seem to think if you are smaller you will of course want to make smaller turns down the slopes. I wish they would standardize the sidecut for all ski sizes in a given model like snowboard manufacturers tend to. Instead the sidecuts change wildly depending on what length ski you buy so keep that in mind when you are shopping around.
 
13844835:kstanz said:
Super biased bc they are all I have really skied on the past 7+ years... but ON3P's are worth the investment for a single quiver ski. Still riding Jeronimos from 2011 or smthin... super durable. I have had shorter seasons the past few years which might be a part of them lasting so long, but I have skied them hard on every type of terrain. The tip randomly delamned once a couple seasons in, and the edge has started ripping out but mostly due to not caring for them properly.

I got a new pair of Jessie 98's (I think) 2 seasons ago for a setup dedicated more to freeskiing, and put touring bindings on them. The graphics are always rad which is step one haha, but I liked that the had a similar build to the J-Mo's. I'm now wishing I just stuck a regular pair of bindings on them because they rip in the park and all-around too.

If you have the $$$, I would snag a pair of Jessie 98's. They'll be stable ripping down groomers, fun in the park, and you'll still be able to float and charge lines in the pow! I did my first freeski comp on them and they stood up. Hope that helps.

Speaking of the Jessie 98's, i'm trying to get my hands on some. Think that's the way I want to go. How do they ride generally? I'm typically 60/40 mountain/park and ride mostly Whistler so I need something that can literally ride it all. I'm 5'1 and consider myself a very strong skier. Also having trouble deciding if it will be a good idea to go for the 170's or not.
 
13848849:Katcher said:
Speaking of the Jessie 98's, i'm trying to get my hands on some. Think that's the way I want to go. How do they ride generally? I'm typically 60/40 mountain/park and ride mostly Whistler so I need something that can literally ride it all. I'm 5'1 and consider myself a very strong skier. Also having trouble deciding if it will be a good idea to go for the 170's or not.

Yo my bad been deep in school lately, but back to ski life! Don't know if you went and bought yet but maybe this will help other people:

Sounds exactly how I ski...haha I am maybe more 70/30 now. And I ride Blackcomb mostly so HMU! I think the Jessie's are perfect for riding all mountain because they have enough rocker and width for heavy pow days, while still having a quick turning radius (which I really like in a ski) for steep stuff and mogels. On top of that - they are playful, my favourite thing is to boost off side hits all around Whis. Never have stability issues with them.

I'm 5'7 and I thiiink I got the 171's but may be riding 161 haha. That is my one problem with them, I think I got them too short bc with the rocker they feel like they ride pretty short. I have not had any opportunity to bring them in the park yet, once I get the bindings swapped out I will be doing more of that this season. More info on the ones I have here: https://www.newschoolers.com/news/read/The-Women-Freeskiing-Guide-Hardgoods

Depends what size ski you ride on now and what you are comfortable with. Jumping to 170 might feel like a lot of ski, heavy, and be tiring to charge on all day. I know when I first got my Jeronimoes it took some adjusting bc they were a lot bigger then my previous ski. Hope that helpzz!
 
Back
Top