What length to use for a backcountry ski

mbrooker

New member
I'm just getting into touring and trying to decide whether I'd like to go with a 190-192cm ski or a 186cm ski. I'm 6'2" ~190lbs and understand that the 190-192 range would be closer to a standard ski length for someone my size and is pretty much the size I ride. I was hoping to get some words of wisdom on what people find works best.
 
is it going to be a ski for straight backcountry or a mix of inbounds/side/backcountry?
 
13880944:jca said:
is it going to be a ski for straight backcountry or a mix of inbounds/side/backcountry?

Its gonna be primarily backcountry, but definitely gonna do some sidecountry/slackcountry as well. I actually got a pair of liberty joe shuster pros for a good deal
 
I personally size down for a pure AT ski. Tight trees, rocks and skinning all are way nicer with a shorter ski. I'm typically milking the turns a little more so I'm not as concerned with stability at speed like I would with a lift ski. I ski a 189 for a resort ski and 175 for a BC ski. My touring partner at 6'5" still skis a 175. Food for thought.
 
13881193:snowpocalypse said:
I personally size down for a pure AT ski. Tight trees, rocks and skinning all are way nicer with a shorter ski. I'm typically milking the turns a little more so I'm not as concerned with stability at speed like I would with a lift ski. I ski a 189 for a resort ski and 175 for a BC ski. My touring partner at 6'5" still skis a 175. Food for thought.

I'm with this. More "backcountry"; more pain in the ass maneouvering a big ski. Unless your BC is Alaskan faces
 
13881165:mbrooker said:
Its gonna be primarily backcountry, but definitely gonna do some sidecountry/slackcountry as well. I actually got a pair of liberty joe shuster pros for a good deal

I'm all about fat backcountry skis but its critical you have a lighter AT binding/boot setup. Like if you put marker dukes or equivalent on those libertys, you're gonna get quite a workout going uphill
 
Realtalk:

I use a 192 TST with kingpins for sidecountry and deeper days, then my 178 Vanguard 97's for peak bagging or longer tours where the weight would mostly get in the way.

Then an assortment of options with Dukes or Aaadrenalines for purely sidecountry on my fatshit skis that I wouldn't want to go on any sort of long tour with anyway.
 
Echoing the "size down" thinking.

1. You won't miss 5cm in the bc. It simply won't be an issue.

2. Lighter.

3. Less tail to get in the way with kick turns.

4. For lighter, narrower setups (spring, hard snow, big days), folks typically size down because they're still getting a longer contact length out of a barely rockered 178cm than they would with a rockered 184.
 
Back
Top