12949564:pussyfooter said:If you can notice it, it's not a very good use of the effect.
It's nearly impossible to get a good result out of it, I'd rather have a slightly unstable shot.
12951111:outaouais_reppin said:How exactly did you "noticed" it? cuz generally it's just a low % of warp stabiliser on a shot that wasn't ugly in the beginning, people generally notice it only when there's too much of the effect and it makes kind of a jello-ish look. If your shots aren't that bad you can use an okay warp stabiliser in premiere and AE
12951116:gavinrudy said:I'd guess that Etienne uses is it because it's hard as fuck to make a shot smooth on a Glidecam when you're tearing up all mountain powder terrain and going off of knolls with Candide. I think that he just weighs the pros and cons and considers that the primary purpose is to impress regular viewers that aren't very videographically inclined, and a warpy shot is better than a shaky shot in that case.
12951366:b_sonntag said:Thank you for seeing the plus side of the stabilizer instead of just saying that it's a terrible effect haha, a bunch of those shots would've probably been incredibly shaky before the effect, which is exactly why I want to know how he does it, because I have a few shaky shots that I want to fix.