i haven't read all of the posts, but i have mixed feelings about iraq. on the one hand, saddam wasn't a terribly great guy (let's draw some comparisons to hitler - genocide, lebensraum, was put in check and weapons restrictions were made after the first gulf war, and then the near policy of appeasement that some countries wanted to impose...) and he was a potential threat to the area (israel, you know, the poor people who have to put up with shit like suicide bombings, but the entire situation the the fault of the UN - a whole different discussion). on the other hand, the intel that our government had on him was DEFINATELY incomplete, and, let's face it - the US, after 200 years of not doing it, INVADED an sovereign nation... i'll let that last part sink in (200 years). but, i will say, if iraq can pull off being a democratic nation in the middle east, then the US has a big one-up on terrorists that threaten every american citizen, whether they're republican, democrat, black, white, christian, jewish, or muslim. we don't know how things are going to turn out over there, anyway, so i really think it's unfair to draw conclusions like 'bush is a fuckup,' etc. this was probably a long ass post and no one will read the entire thing, but oh well.
_____________________
'hitler on a stick i tell ya. The new frozen treat from COMMUUNIST CHINA'