TOO GANGSTER!!!

Alex_thedroog

Alex_thedroog

Active member
Ya you heard it. A bunch of kids got robbed at a comp for being "too gangster". Some of the steeziest kids lost to tight pant wearing faggots who sucked. Including me. Oh ya, and the judges were those HOLDEN faggots that didn't know shit about skiing.
 
They probably couldn't see what you were doing underneath all those clothes and doo-rags. Either that or the other kids did better tricks. Attributing your loss of a trivial contest to the way you dressed is a really lame way of lashing out on other people for your faults.
 
actually tom wallish had one of the sickest runs fo the day in qualifying at the aspen open....he also used no poles and got scored horribly....written on the judges scores sheet was "NO POLES!!!" that is fucking retarded
 
thats what happened to me at a comp today. They said my tall T was too Tall. HAHAH. I laugh at the emo kids. The kid that one skipped three of the jibs and did a pencil 7 off of the side of the kicker for a barrel jib... Wack shit.
 
ya it wasnt really anything to do with to ganster more like No Poleers got screwed by the bottom two judges. since when did a perfect swith 9 deserve a score of 20 out of 100
 
He knows what I am talking about. He was there. The kids that won sucked. The best run was done by this kid with super baggy clothes and a ton of steeze, his best trick was a 630 off. And he didn't come close to the podium.
 
why would you do a comp with no poles?????????

i mean no poles can be fun but not all the time

it feels like your rollerbladding or ski boarding
 
alright this may blow your mind...but maybe, just maybe...THEY LIKE SKIING WITHOUT POLES. get your head out of your ass.
 
the more i think about this, the more i think you might be right.

obviously the contest should just be like 90% how good you look/what you're wearing, 5% for having a large quantity of marijuana at hand, another 4% for having a gun, and like .5% for skill

the rest of the percentage is left to account for human errors in judging, like not correctly reading the label on your coat, etc.
 
yes, and they are quite humorous when they fall because it hurts them more and is funnier because their thongs go up their asses and they have mini seizures. if they arent wearing thongs, theyre wearing nothing contributing to the sack effect, i love life!
 
Judges who cannot keep an open mind do not deserve their position. I have always thought Mercon was cool, but this changes that.
 
well no shit but skiing without poles is like a whole different sport tho

what do you think goes thro the judges minds when they see kids throwing down with poles and kids throwing down without poles

 
.....ok?

well maybe they thought that skiing with those useless pieces of aluminum would make skiing harder rather than skiing without them
 
I didnt ask for you to think up some stupid comeback

Do you really think judges are on ns watching all the no pole vids of pep and shit i mean come on no poling isnt everywere and barely anyone that doesnt freeski really knows much or seen much of it

just do this

think back like a year ago when no one really no poled besides ski instructors and snow bladders and think what you would of thought of a run steezy no pole run and a steezy pole run
 
judges need to change with the times. although no poles was exclusive a couple years ago its getting bigger now, obviously
 
as quoted by a fellow NSer whos name escapes me:

"no poles is fine and people should try it, but everyone ditching their poles all of a sudden would be equally ridiculous to hating on no poles."
 
tom is so much sicker than 99.99% of the people on this site will ever be. he deserved so much more than what he got
 
So by that logic, the guy who duct tapes 10 pound weights to the tips of his skis should get the highest score because he added more useless material to make skiing harder.
 
HAHAHAH

There are so many things wrong with everything you are saying.

First, why do people have to ski with poles? so one person has a 3 foot piece of alluminum in their hands, that makes it skiing, and without that, it's not? sooo, is it a different sport if someone decided not to use a hat or goggles? what if someone decided to not wear ski clothing? It's not a fucking different sport you tool, it's still fucking skiing, poles or no. 

Are Pep and Andy suddenly not skiers?

Second, How does a worthless peice of alluminum, (which increase your ability to balance, help when you spin, essentially make people look better/quiet their upper body when they ski) make it HARDER? have you ever skied without poles? do you realize how much harder it is to make things look good, slide rails, keep your body composed?

Basically, itshouldn't matter. the judges should judge on skiing skill, not wether or not people use poles, which are completely unnessesary in park skiing.
 
You want to know what I think Mercon thought?

"that kid throws down harder than me, and I like using my poles. I have been doing the same tricks for 5 years, and I think everyone should conform to my personal idea of what skiing should be.
 
yeah, ok?

or maybe they dont know what to think so they judged the "pollers" cus there familiar with them
 
you guys are all big dumb fags.

well most of you.

just cause you suck toms taint doesn't mean he's the most ballin' shit in the world.

he kills but there are others in the sport that aren't gangsta Biaaaaatches that still kill.

holler back!
 
yeah holden is gay, wearing pratical pants is gay and "emo". Well you are all so ganster why not go shoot some niggaz and play C-LO..you people are a fucking joke, you are white and skiers...identity crisis perhaps, got perhaps compensating with clothes that are not only extrememly unfucntional, but just provide an excuse for bad skiers to make themselves look better byv concealing thier flails and horrible body position...perhaps!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top