Tight ski pants and no poles- love em,hate em?

agreed^ although no poles are fun sometimes jus to mess around, tight pants make me mad. i love all the jean skiers that come to the mountains. I mean srsly where some snowpants atleast do that
 
personally i think cedric and i are the only people good nough to wear tight pants becuse we have huge dicks which show, you can see them hanging down to our knees
 
i actually really like the tightpants style. an for no poles i dont care about, i dont even notice most of the time cause its not important.
 
i love no poles in the park and just to fuck around with

and some people can pull off the tight pants if they got the style
 
tight pants and no poles are both awesome! 99.9 percent of the people wearing "tight pants" arent actually wearing tight pants, they are just fitted like normal pants you would wear off the hill with a little bit of bagginess, plus it looks cooler cause its not the exact same as every single other skier trying to look gangster. im fine with pretty baggy clothes, like just normal stuff or bright stuff, but like the 10xl shirts going down to your ankles and the baloon pants just looks so dumb and no poles are awesome since there is absolutlely no purpose for poles in the park, and its much steezier, poles are ugly as hell. and no poles is so much fun!

poles and the whole thug baggy clothing thing is getting soooo played, it all looks the same. its awesome that people are going with a totally different style, it keeps it interesting. and its nice to skiers actually realizing that they are white!!
 
My 'tight pants' are way baggier than any jeans I own.. but they're still 'tight pants' by skiing standards.

It's all just fashion- if we lived in the 70s/hotdogging era of skiing, we'd have a completely different perspective on what's dope - there's nothing inherently cool or uncool about tight stuff (or baggy stuff).
 
USE THE DAMN SEARCHBAR! there have been a million threads about both of these equally gay topics but.... there were none with both in the same thread. so combine them?! how innovative. i'm baffled by how much you guys sure love to bitch and moan over the size of peoples' pants and the things the do or do not carry in their hands while having the time of their lives.
 
To each their own.

I personally think tight pants looks good. No poles can look bad if your arms are flailing around like an epileptic. If you have more fun in no poles/ tight pants then fucking go for it. FREESking. Do what you want.
 
did you really have to start another one of these threads? i mean really? all people do is argue, and in the end it changes nothing. waste of time, and space. i mean jesus! there are already like thirty of these threads. and every single of them are the same.
 
tight pants is acceptable for snowboarders to do because they make it look pretty cool. it just looks strange on skiers, i wouldnt really consider doing it until i see a skier that can pull it off and make it look nice
 
I don't wear tight pants anywhere, mainly because I don't like standing out like that. but I still think it looks kinda cool. No poles is the shit, no one can deny that taking a no poles run once in awhile is super fun.
 
ˆˆˆThat's how people come off to me when they say either one of these is gay and shouldn't be done. I'll chuckle when I see someone who doesn't seem to pull it off too well, but why do people on ns care so much? What about skiers like Hugo Harrison and the like? He wears tight, technical fit stuff, and he's a way better skier than any of you can hope to become, which in the end is really what it comes down to.
 
touche. i still think you can wear normal fit pants without lookin super baggy or super tight, but you make a valid pooint. you can throw tuffelmire onto that list too. for me though, its still baggy.
 
I kinda don't mind no poles and really don't like tight pants at all. But over both of those I think you should wear whatever the fuck you want when you ski as long as you're enjoying yourself
 
i like both, that way not everyone is tight panted or not everyone is G, but at the moment its mostly baggy waggy and every think tight stuffs dumb, but i like it and no poles is fine too, cause its just another way to ski
 
i find it funny that people continue to bring up the "no poles" threads....

i personally think its stupid....if you really know how to ski you would understand the

importance of the pole and how it effects your skiing.....
 
tight pants are no good, just because i have a big butt.

i personally think no poles looks cooler in the park. on bumps and groomers it looks wack though
 
gotta love kids that use gay as their argument for why tight pants shouldnt be worn. always a valid point.
 
SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!

if you weren't all such fucking GIRLS!!!! it wouldnt matter. jesus christ.

no offence to girls.

in fact, you guys give girls a bad name.

fuck you.
 
i agree, blake nyman is super smooth too.

and to the person who said something about "tight pants" just bieng a normal fit tat you'd wear off te hill, that would be true if you wear tight jeans off the hill. thats what i do. it's good, i feel a lot more my self wearing what i wear off the hill on it.

I am indifferent on the poles thing, i use them but some times i don't like if i tink they'll get in the way of a trick i'm doing for the first time or if i can't be arsed carrng tem wile i hike a rail or something.
 
the entire surface crew is steezier than 90% of any other pro's out there, and look at max hill, he makes tom wallisch look like a gaper in terms of steeze.
 
great logic: "you're annoying so I'll be annoying too" you whiney-ass barney

ps....i honestly don't think i've ever heard tight panted skiers bitch and moan about the size of gangsta's pants

 
i think everyone should stop caring so much about what people look like and start worrying more about getting better at skiing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top