Thruster, T-Hall, or Punx?

Noah_W

Noah_W

Member
So here's the thing. I'm trying to decide on what ski to get next year a Salomon Thruster, Armada T-Hall, or Atomic Punx. which one do u think is the best?
 
i really like de punx they work really well in the park, and oh don;t forget armadas are atomic skis with less quality materials, they;re made in the atomic factory. i can tell cause i;ve been there...
 
no they're not at all. Lines are not K2s just because they're in the same factory. They use different molds and different materials, not necessarily worse. Don't even try to pull that "those are the same skis but worse because theyre smaller" bullshit because it's simply not true.

and the thruster is a dope park ski in general...but so is the t-hall it all depends on what kind of ski you like.
 
as you say it yourself, they use different material (cheaper), that;s what atomic, team manager told us, when he tour us into the factory. but every body prefers armada cause tanner use them (fact) i don;t say armadas are bad skis, i;m saying atomic's are better (my point of view)
 
Dude. Armada makes completely different skis. People prefer the Armada shapes and the designs on them, not the fact that the materials are a teensy bit worse. I personally think the Atomic Thugs are a sick nasty ski but the Armada ARG might be a better choice and has been the more preferable powder ski...so who knows?
 
^thread hijackers!!!!

take a a look at the LINE ANTHEMS. a pretty good allmountain ski.

even can (relatively) keep you up in powder.
 
ZOMG NO WAY!!!

anyway thats a pretty good selection of skis right there i don't think u can go wrong with any of them. however the thrusters foam core probably won't hold up as long as the other two, so i'd say punx or t-halls. so yup, all i did was narrow it down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top