TANNER vs. DUMONT

i think its should be more like pep vs candide. i mean whos done the most for the progression, not popularity of the sport

people diss the xgames every year, but then use xgames gold to support their points...cmon be consistent
 
^^ i agree with lax. you guys are forgetting awesome people left and right and thats all im bitching about. yeah, Tanner and Dumont are good, but they arent the "Best". Candide should definetly be given at least a long hard look at for his progression every year, injured or not. same with pep, and sage, and others too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top