T wall owned

Yea, except Tom did it in one run on a variety of real park features as opposed to a foot tall back yard setup. Otherwise, yea, totally pwned him.
 
I dont see any ownage here. Owning him would be if T-wall ate shit on a rail, and some no name kid did the exact thing Wallisch attempted to do, but did not crash and he stomped it cleanly (minus the afterbang)
 
Its not filmed in one take, obviously it took him more than 8 shots to get this, and 50 just came to mind, it could be more or less. T-Wall got his in 1
 
not on snow, not in one run, done on a pvc rail that's like 5 inches off the ground.

Props for the skills, but don't claim like that unless your gonna actually 1 up him the real way.
 
I think i'm missing something here. But what exactly did T-Wall do that this kid is trying to beat?
 
In one continuous run through a couple of parks at Buttermilk, CO, Tom did all 8 possible switchup to 270 out variations (not including the other 8 that are possible when you take into consideration hitting a rail switch.
here you go:

Courtesy of Newschoolers.com
flash_video_placeholder.png

 
that kid killed it but like people said the ridiculousness of tom's was that it was in a row. I wouldn't say anyone got owned here.
 
Haha I love how offended all of NS is getting by this. "Don't make fun of my t-wall! He is the best skier ever and no one is ever gonna be as good" The video was sick and obviously it was not as good as what wallisch did, but it was still sick so chill.
 
ahm, sorry but:

2 Skiers - Wallisch [pro], Sig Tveit [good in norway but nobody all over the world knows him - no offense, dont missunderstand me]

2 Places - PVC rail, mountain with different kinds of obstacles

2 Videos!

I dont understand anything right now - with the facts listed above, how could you compare this??

Sig Tveit is a sick skier, no doubt, but what exactly is going on with the thread starter? Is he talkin bout the intro to sigs vid or what? I dont see any pwn there

correct me if Im wrong
 
no where, read the context of the post i quoted.
someone said it was done in fifty trys
he said who said fifty
and i said who said 8
meaning it was more then 8 trys wich is not comperable with t walls all on first try and one run edit
 
it was. nooones saying its not.for me i personally i cant, for the life of me, get the unnatural back swap back 2 out
i think its sweet as hell he got them all, and got em on tape.
what everyone seems to be pissed at is he said he owned t-wall (NSers jesus christ) to them it blastfomos.
this should not be a thread but simply a video posted in media.
 
definitely
but it's super retarded, that this kid is claiming that he owned tom, when he did it on a summer setup with pvc pipes.
 
COME OOOOON. There is no claiming at all. Remember a little competition called JOSS? Remeber a certain team called Team Sweden? Remember their intro? I know, it is totally outrageous to think that he isn't 100% serious when talking directly to the camera, it's a far mor logical explanation that the laughter is a sign of nervousness, nothing else. BUT i must say, if you think about it a good fifteen minutes or so, i find it possible that the edit is in fact a parody.

Still not 100% certain though...
 
Yes it was sick

No he did not own Tom because the situations are not comparable

Both are very skilled but different scenarios here

That is all
 
my bad guys. i hadn't seen the t-wall vid in quite a while and didn't think he 270d out of them like this kid but of course he did..he's wallisch. sorry but still props to that kid im glad i shared either way.
 
sorry but t-wall did not get owned!
Congrats to Sigbjorn for stomping all of them cleanly, but tom also stomped them all in one run.
Maybe doing them all switch or lip would be ownage.
 
All 8 is a game us Salt Lakers play in the preseason... theres TONS of people that can do it with ease. difference is, Wallisch does it all in one run!
besides that, you should watch will wesson play all 1000
 
im pretty sure we all agree that the video is good, and that the kid has talent, but by no means did he "own" twall. the thread is titled "T wall owned", t wall did not get owned, and people are pointing it out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top